Archive for the ‘take action NOW!’ Category

Is the president being impeached?

Sunday, February 28th, 2010

(re-post of a blog post I did in June 2008 about George W. Bush. I’m re-posting to quash beliefs that I only dislike liberals and love all Republicans.)

statue-of-liberty-spanking-george-bush

Is the president being impeached? (I hope so.)

I have been watching a lot of C-SPAN lately. It’s basically the only thing worth watching, now that all TV pretty much sucks.

Not a lot of people watch C-SPAN. So I’m one of the small percentage of Americans who know, at this moment, that Representative Dennis Kucinich is on the Congressional floor presenting his resolution calling for Bush’s impeachment. It’s a list of 35 charges, (list here) mostly Constitutional violations and Geneva Convention violations, and he’s been reading it for about an hour, and he’s about halfway through it. A member of the House of Representatives presenting a resolution detailing charges is one of the first steps in impeachment proceedings.

The charges range from election fraud, including disenfranchisement, to illegal wiretapping to illegal torture, to lying about our reasons for going to war, to handing out padded military contracts to his buddies. And a lot more. I can barely keep up. And I’m as giddy as a kid in a candy store about this. So is Debra Jean. She’s glued to the screen. We both love the Constitution. A lot.

It’s history in the making, and it’s not even on CNN.com or Yahoo News yet. I think it’s an emergency meeting, because it’s 10:30 PM in DC right now. I remember seeing the effort to impeach Richard Nixon as news coverage on TV when I was a kid, but he was never actually impeached. (He quit before that could happen, and Ford pardoned Nixon as soon as he took office.) And Nixon was basically just going to be charged with, as I recall, one thing (conspiring to pay people to bug a hotel room). The charges being read against Bush are many, and many are far more serious.

Kucinich is quoting the US Constitution a lot. I wish Kucinich had made it to run for president. He’s smart, and has other things going for him.

I have a prediction: tonight on the Colbert show, Colbert will report this out of character, as he really is, not as his “alter ego” who would be outraged by this. He’ll just state it, and let people cheer.

Here’s a quick 20-minute podcast I recorded, and uploaded while the proceedings were still being read live. It’s about 17 minutes of the charges being read, and about three minutes of us commenting on it. We’re pretty much in shock. And pretty happy.

(behind every great short man is a smart, better looking, and often taller, woman)

How people are FORCED at gunpoint give away their private assets to “help” others.

Saturday, February 27th, 2010

TS asked on a comment on another thread: “Please explain how people are being ‘forced’ to give away their private assets to help others.” (in regard to progressives/liberals/Democrats).

This really is libertarianism 101, but deserves its own post.

But here ya go:

When you vote in people who want to increase social spending (welfare, for instance, or foreign aid), those people raise taxes. If someone who did not vote for that person disagrees, he has to pay those taxes anyway. If he doesn’t pay taxes, agents of the government will come to his house and arrest him. If he refuses to come out, they will come in his house and put a gun to his head.

Therefore, the social services you “benevolently” and “compassionately” vote for are paid for with taxes collected at the barrel of a gun. This is an initiation of aggression and a use of force and is NOT compassionate.

Moreover, Democracy is undemocratic, because 51% can tyrannize 49% with things like this.

This joke explains it well:

I recently asked my friends’ little girl what she wanted to be when she grows up. She said she wanted to be President some day. Both of her parents, liberal Democrats, were standing there, so I asked her, ‘If you were President what would be the first thing you would do? ‘

She replied, ‘I’d give food and houses to all the homeless people.’

Her parents beamed with pride.

‘Wow…what a worthy goal.’ I told her, ‘But you don’t have to wait until you’re President to do that. You can come over to my house and mow the lawn, pull weeds, and sweep my yard, and I’ll pay you $50. Then I’ll take you over to the grocery store where the homeless guy hangs out, and you can give him the $50 to use toward food and a new house. ‘

She thought that over for a few seconds, then she looked me straight in the eye and asked, ‘ Why doesn’t the homeless guy come over and do the work, and you can just pay him the $50? ‘

I said, ‘Welcome to the Republican Party.’

Her parents still aren’t speaking to me.

Another quick explanation is found in one of my lyrics, the Right Arm of Wyoming song “Freaky Liberal Mammal Sex“:

If my neighbor had three cars and I stole one
I’d rightly go to prison
If this “progressive” gub’ment mugs my neighbor for his car
to tax-support crack babies
Liberals think that’s justice

–Michael W. Dean

…two steps back.

Monday, February 22nd, 2010

Well, we can’t win them all.

For the Record: Uganda’s Proposed Law

This slick piece, created by WorldNet Daily contributor Jason Mitchell (also known as ‘Molotov Mitch’) has created a bit of a stir.  I can’t see why, I mean, he’s only coming out in support of a bill currently pending in Uganda’s parliament that would make homosexuality a capital offense.  He seems irked that many people, including thousands of Christians, have called upon American religious and political leaders to condemn the people pushing this bill.  If gay Ugandans don’t like the new law, should it take effect, they can just leave. 

This bill, commonly referred to as the “Kill the Gays” bill, would make certain gay sex acts punishable by death and others by life imprisonment.  It would also require Ugandans who know a gay person to report them to the police.  Failure to do so will land them in jail.  Perhaps Ugandans can leave, but where will they go?  Africa is the New Christian Experiment, with Catholics on one side promoting starvation, famine, and AIDS by preaching against condoms and borth control, and Evangelicals pushing for draconian laws against homosexuality and agreeing, for once, with the Catholics on doing away with condoms.  Christians have been fucking over Africa for centuries.  Maybe King Mwanga II was right.

Who was King Mwanga?  According to Mitchell, he was a “Sodomite King” who passed a law that required any male he desired to yield to his sexual advances.   There is no evidence that King Mwanga II was a homosexual or that he instituted such a law.  In my readings on the subject, only Mitchell makes the claim.  According to his summary on Wikipedia, he was a polygamist who had sixteen wives with whom he fathered seven sons and four daughters.  While he might have enjoyed the company of men on the side, the claim that he was a “Sodomite” is ridiculous on it’s face.  Mwanga II did, in fact, have 22 Catholic missionaries burned at the stake, but not because they refused his charming propositions.  He had them killed because they had converted to Catholicism and wouldn’t renounce their new faith.  These men became known as the Uganda Martyrs, but they died for their religious beliefs, not because they wouldn’t play with the king’s royal sceptre.  Later in life, after being deposed and exiled to the Seychelles, Mwanga became an Anglican and spent his final days as a Christian man.  

Mitchell also lies about the Founding Fathers, claiming they made homosexuality a capital offense, yet he only cites two examples where anything close to this was enforced.  “Anti-buggery laws” were a default under English Common Law.  This isn’t really a stretch.  To say that they actively persecuted homosexuals, however, is.  Very simply, homosexuality wasn’t defined as an orientation or attraction until 100 years after the Republic was founded.  Of course, homosexuality existed- Washington did have a soldier drummed out.  It didn’t stop him from having Baron Friederich von Steuben, a Prussian General and alleged lover of young boys, come and whip the Continental Army into shape.  Without von Steuben, it’s likely the Revolutionary War would have been lost. 

He ends his slick propaganda piece with a quote from Martin Luther King, Jr, saying that “the moral arm of the universe is long, but it bends towards justice”.  I don’t think Mitchell understands the context of that quote, but then again, he deliberately mischaracterized and outright falsified so much else in is video editorial, I don’t think one more lie will matter.

~Matti Frost

Free libertarian punk CD for active military

Sunday, February 21st, 2010

FREE LIBERTARIAN PUNK CD FOR ACTIVE MILITARY

ANGRY PEASANT RECORDS will send CDs FREE to active military at US/ APO/FPO address. Will send to the first 70 who write us. (NO FAKERS. REMEMBER, STOLEN VALOR IS A CRIME AND WE WILL CHECK!)

Sending these free to our troops is our small way of saying THANK YOU!

email your name, rank and address to us and we’ll mail it out promptly!

YOU GET: TWO (yes, 2!) copies of the CD of feisty libertarian gun-nut punk rock/industrial music, CLING TO OUR GUNS by Right Arm of Wyoming. Check out the music at www.rightarmofwyoming.

Extra copy of the CD is to “spread the love”, makes a perfect gift for that leftie relative who needs some modern “school house rock” to educate them on the error of their ways!

STYLE: PUNK ROCK, HARDCORE PUNK ROCK, INDUSTRIAL ROCK, ROCK ‘N” ROLL

SONG LISTING:

1. GET OFF MY PROPERTY!
2. MY GUN KEEPS YOU HONEST
3. REDISTRIBUTION OF THEFT
4. GOVERNMENT IS A COLLECTIVE HALLUCINATION
5. GUN CONTROL GETS WOMEN RAPED
6. LIBERTY IN SHARDS
7. FREAKY LIBERAL MAMMAL SEX
8. FAKIN’ THE RACE CARD
9. SINGLE CRACKLING BLUE FLASH
10. WE ARE THE GOOD GUYS!
11. US Bill of Rights (read by Mrs. Dean)
12. LETTER TO A YOUNG ME (SPOKEN)
13. MY GUN KEEPS YOU HONEST – CLEAN VERSION FOR RADIO
REVIEWS:

—”Fox News – the band” – Bridge Nine punk forums

—”As refreshing as a gunshot to the head…” – children’s book author Eric B. Anderson

—”You rule! I listened to your CD. It’s AWESOME!” –Pat Kim (head honcho at ConservativePunk.com)

—”WOW, you do not pull any punches. Great! The movement needs music which will strike a cord with all different kinds of people. Thanks for all you are doing to preserve our freedoms, liberty and culture.”

– Patriotic singer Lloyd Marcus

—”I threw up watching this crap. Talk about trying to indoctrinate! Pure propaganda set to music.”

–Some Michael Moore fan, commenting about Right Arm of Wyoming on YouTube

CD is factory glass mastered (not burned at home), and packaged in nice cardboard sleeve with four-color printing.

.

Alaska Governor wants to make YOU pay for someone elses college.

Thursday, February 18th, 2010

http://www.adn.com/news/education/story/964075.html

Alaska Governor Sean Parnell is proposing a bill that will pay for a students schooling depending on grades (A=%100, B= %75, C=%50). I think this is bullshit. No one has the right to make you pay for another person’s college. And now while this is probably paid for by taxes from the oil companies and other corporation and not individuals, it’s still wrong. Taxation is theft, whether by a mugger in the street or a politician in DC. And what is a corporation but a group of individuals.

And the price of this?:

Parnell is proposing to pay for it by carving out $400 million of the state’s $8 billion Constitutional Budget Reserve Fund savings account as its own separate endowment, saying interest and investment profits from that would be used to pay for the scholarships. State Education Commissioner Larry LeDoux said it’s not clear how much the program would cost the state each year but he figures $20 million could be available annually for covering the costs of the scholarship program.

I would much rather struggle to pay for college and live off of ramen and live on a couch through my schooling than make others pay for my college.

-JD

Heathen’s Lament

Thursday, February 11th, 2010

Last Sunday, I was working around 3 PM, delivering food, when a bolt of inspiration struck me.  I heard a melody in my head and I couldn’t get it out, but I knew if I didn’t do something I’d forget it eventually.  I’ve lost so many ideas that way.  So, I wrote down the first half of the first verse of what would become a new song in less than 24 hours’ time.

“And we march on through the frigid night,
In the shadow of our forefathers,
We brave the Winter’s might.”

I didn’t know if I would keep these at the time, or where the song would go from there, but it was enough so I remembered the melody.  When I got home at midnight, I picked up my acoustic and fired up the drum program, and out came this song.

Heathen’s Lament
by Matt Frost, February 2010

And we march on through the frigid night,
In the shadow of our forefathers,
We brave the Winter’s might
Soldiering across this barren lane
To where we’ll join out kin
And resist the invading warriors of
Christendom, who’re threatening
To destroy our very way of life

Lay siege to the cross
Don’t let them gain upon your ground
Fight to defend our clan
Cut every last one of them down-
Before they kill us all,
And put our women and children
To their swords and burning stakes
And raze our temples and destroy
Our lore, our tales of old
Traditions handed down for eons
From the bards, we were told
We must not let this be our fate
 

The next day, after mixing Not While I Draw Breath, Jay and I hammered out Heathen’s Lament in about six hours.  While lyrically, this sounds like a gung-ho fight song, it’s intended to be a reflection on the history of what happened centuries ago, how vigorously our pre-Christian ancestors fought, and yet could not stem the spread of Christianity.  At best, Christianity absorbed some of the heathen customs, holidays, and traditions, at worst, people were killed and the beliefs of our ancestors were stomped out.  This song is written from the perspective of those who are marching off to fight to preserve their traditions, their culture, and their gods, who saw Christianity as a threat to their way of life and were willing to do whatever they had to do to stop it.  Ultimately, they failed, and were either assimilated into Christendom, killed, or driven far from their ancestral homes and land.

Now that we live in a time of relative safety, we do battle mostly with words and images.  We don’t go at each other with swords and axes, or guns for that matter.  Instead, we mostly trade verbal slights and barbs.  Non-Christians are subject to proselytizing by fervent believers, but that’s nothing new.  We’ve learned to deal with that.  However, there may be a time when the strife will become physical- maybe not- but the question remains, will we allow history to repeat itself?  It probably won’t even be Christianity that threatens this time.  Christians in Europe don’t seem to be willing to stand up to Islamists anymore and there aren’t enough Heathens to fight this battle.  Even speaking out against Islam in Europe can be considered a hate crime, just ask Geert Wilders.  So, basically, the song is saying, keep your swords sharp, your wits about you, and be prepared for anything.  You never know when you may have to really fight for what you truly believe in.  I sincerely hope and wish for peace and understanding between Christians, Muslims, and those of us who don’t follow any of the Middle Eastern Abrahamic faiths, but I still don’t think we’ve quite reached that level of ecumenicism.

And of course, enjoy the song.  For all the layered meanings in the words, it’s a catchy number that’ll have you toe-tapping and singing along.

~Matti Frost

Suggestion for the new-school tea partiers

Tuesday, February 9th, 2010

The opening speaker, Tom Tancredo, at that fancy “tea party” that was covered the other day by all the news outlets didn’t win any friends by saying we need to reinstate “literacy tests to vote.”

I would have said “basic civics tests, similar to the ones people have to take to become citizens.”

“Literacy tests” are what they called the extremely difficult, un-passable without a law degree, tests they gave blacks in the south up to the 60s to keep them from voting.
That guy’s wording allowed Rachel Maddow to call all tea partiers racist.
MWD

Strong words, angry music.

Monday, February 8th, 2010

The most life-changing moments for me have always come by accident, it seems.  When I was 15, I told a lie that ended up committing me to buying a drumset and started me on the path to becoming a musician.  When I was 30, another flap of my big fat mouth put me in the gym and it’s kept me there, more or less, for the last 7 years.  This bout of happenstance, however, was not my doing, at least, not directly, but it came about through my acquaintance with Michael W. Dean.

Michael and I met online at ConservativePunk.com, where our common love for music and passion of political discourse made us friends, at least online friends.  When he was writing the first Right Arm of Wyoming album, I offered to send him some drum loops I had created in a program I have.  Being a drummer for so long, I tend to try and make programmed drums sound as real as possible.  Alas, I had no way of uploading the files to him, as none of the upload sites worked, but all of this was discussed openly on ConPunk.

After the RAW CD Cling to Our Guns was released, Michael would post reviews and comments on ConPunk, both positive and negative.  One such post was a review posted on the Bridge Nine forums.  The post, titled Fox News- The Band, was a scathing criticism of RAW’s music and themes.  One user, however, seemed to have some inside knowledge, which could only have come from them being a lurker on ConPunk.  They claimed that I was the drummer for RAW and that I was a “homosexual right-wing Odinist”.  Sadly, the post has long since scrolled off the boards, but it did make me call out the person who posted such wrong information about me and RAW on the B9 boards.  I also became a poster there as well.

It was shortly thereafter that I saw a post about organizing a compilation CD titled Enough is Enough, to benefit Freedom to Marry, an organization dedicated to promoting marriage equality and fighting anti-gay ballot initiatives.  I contacted the organizer, Paul Blest, and offered a Frost Giant song, but none of the existing songs at the time fit topically except for Relic, which was just too long at 9 minutes to be included.  So, I decided to record fresh.  Initially, the plan was to do a 7 Seconds song called Regress No Way, which was arguably one of the first anti-homophobia songs out there, but the compilation started gaining ground, and soon, a lot of bigger names in punk & hardcore started signing on.  I knew then that as much as I love that band, I couldn’t go out there with a 7 Seconds cover.  I wanted to make my mark, so I decided to write a new song.  It took me a long time to get a song in my head, as I do not do too well when I am forced up against a deadline, but soon enough I had something to work with and I went to my drum program and my trusty Les Paul and wrote it out.  What came out of it was something I never imagined. 

The song Not While I Draw Breath is probably the most angriest, pissed off, intense and in-your-face Frost Giant song to date.  The lyrics deal with standing up to oppression and tyranny, of not caving in and backing down, and with being willing to hurt, suffer, and even die for the sake of your principles.  It speaks of defending yourself and not going out meekly without a fight.  On one hand, it could refer to the fight for marriage equality and is thus in line with the message of the compilation, but it’s written to be far more universal than that.  Complacency, apathy, and willful ignorance abound in music and in pop culture in general.  We are easily distracted by trivial things and made to focus on those as if they were important while we’re taken for a ride on the things that really matter.  I intend this song to be a wake-up call to anyone that will hear it, but I leave it to the listener to apply it to their own lives however they see fit.  I will not tell you what to think or what you should stand for, only that you should think, and that you should stand for something.

Not While I Draw Breath

by Matt Frost, January 2010.  All rights reserved.

Will you stand with me
Fight and die if need be
Hold against the hordes until
The last man falls
Will you sacrifice all
You have gained in life
Reject your comfort
For a greater end
Stand together
And never waver
Brave in the face of
Overwhelming odds
For our future,
And our freedom
We unite in
Liberty or death

The evil stirs from its sleep
And no one will be safe from its reach
For we shall fight to be free
And never will we bend our knee

Forever clawing
Fight like a demon
Taking it to
The very bitter end
Swords are drawing
Battle lines forming
Storm clouds are churning
Soon there will be war
The earth will be fed
With blood
And the skies will weep
Unto the dead
Never give up,
Never back down,
We unite in
Liberty or death

Tonight, we lay down our lives
In the path of those who would oppress
And enslave us to their god
And trod us under until we are no more

Not while I draw breath
Will I submit, will I accept
Not while I draw breath
Will I bow down, nor will I live
With empty regrets

Now feel the sting of a thousand swords
Vanquish the hordes drive them away
To the darkness from whence they came
Obliterate they are no more

Overrun them all
Take what is ours.
Crush the wretched enemy
Bring victory
To our hearth and home

***************************************

Check the song out on the Frost Giant myspace.  Let me know what you think.

~Matti F.

Gun violence is the lefties’ fault

Tuesday, January 26th, 2010

Gun violence is the fault of the progressives.

I don’t really have much of a problem with the Democratic Party. I have a problem with the so-called progressives, the far-Left, which usually lives these days in the Democratic Party (Pelosi, Obama, Reid, Frank, Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton, and Ted Kennedy, whom I want to congratulate on getting five months sober this week!) But there are progressives on the Right too. John McCain is one. Rudy Giuliani is another.

The only legitimate, Constitutional, moral role of government is to protect the borders and protect the Constitutional rights of the citizens. This is right-wing/libertarian ideology in a nutshell.

By definition, progressives are people who think that government should grow and should attempt to “solve” everyone’s problems (often the problems created by the government). Progressives are busybodies. They think they’re smarter than you. They tend to say “THERE OUGHTA BE A LAW!” and “THINK OF THE CHILDREN!” a lot. To which I say “You think of your children, I’ll think of mine.”

A good example of progressive thought in action is the financial crisis: progressives (like Obama, but also George W. Bush in his “lame duck” period) caused a problem. Then they try to solve the same problem, using the people who caused it (Ben Bernanke). Then they do exactly what should NOT be done (printing more money, going into debt).

Any eighth grader who’s good at math can tell you that’s the wrong way. The right way is to get out of the way, remove regulations, and let the economy flourish.

Here’s a good video explaining this. It’s sort of “School House Rock” for the new generation:

It is not the role of government to “create jobs.” At best, the role of government is to create an environment (low taxes, no nanny laws) where jobs are created by a free market.

There are tens of thousands of gun laws in America, at the federal, state and local level. Yet not one of them has ever prevented a crime. They only serve to make politicians look like they’re doing their job, and make law-abiding citizens into criminals.

Progressives want to outlaw guns to solve the problem of gun violence, a problem the progressives created!

Right-wing states like Utah and Wyoming have a very low incidence of gun violence. And guns are common, and treated with respect. People are also treated with respect. (The ironic thing is that less “redneck” places look at places like Utah and Wyoming as “primitive.” They laugh at us. They are wrong. We’re far more socialized and decent places to live. I know. I’ve lived in Los Angeles, and I’ve had a knife held to my throat in a mugging in New York City.)

Left-wing progressive places like New York City, Los Angeles, Chicago and Washington, D.C. have high rates of gun violence. Sure, part of this has to do with population, but a lot of it has to do with culture.

I’m not a Christian, but I believe that Christian upbringing ain’t a bad thing. Back when that was the norm, gun crime was much lower. Even the “Wild West”, often considered the go-to example of gun violence, didn’t have that much gun violence. That impression is the work of Hollywood. Which is filled with progressives. When is the last time you saw a person in a movie use a gun in a moral way, in pure self-defense? Almost never. Yet movies are filled with people using guns, almost always in an immoral way. Using a gun in a movie is “shorthand” for excitement. The prevalence of guns in movies is the result of lazy screenwriters, and gun-hating producers.

Right-wing places teach children to work for their goals. Left-wing places teach children that they are “entitled”, that they only have to “dream it, and they’ll get it.”….”I gots to get mine“….. Which place do you think produces more bitter, disappointed people willing to shoot up a crowd of innocents?

Progressives also downplay the role of family. Conservatives tend to have stronger families, and teach that “family is all”. Progressives teach that the family unit is an impediment, that you should “spread your wings and find your own way.”

Which group do you think has a better foundation for dealing with problems?

Progressives are revisionist with history. They downplay the role of guns in the founding of America, especially in the American Revolution. The whitewash the role of hard work in the foundation and strengthening of America. They consider wealth a bad thing, something that only exists to be stolen and redistributed to those who “deserve it” just for existing. This creates an angry underclass of people who not only think the world owes them a living, but reinforces it with a bi-monthly check.

Progressives support revolving-door prison systems, and are usually against the death penalty. Both of these put more violent people back on the street and don’t discourage violent behavior. Progressives generally consider violent felons to be a “victims of a bad upbringing” rather than simply broken machines. A good example is the ACLU, which has reams of writings on the rights of violent criminals in custody, but not one word on self-defense.

Progressives teach that any culture except American culture (including guns) is to be protected. Progressives teach that American culture is embarrassing, something to apologize for.

The progressive media also only ever reports immoral uses of guns. When was the last time you saw a news story about a little old lady using her gun to keep from being killed by some armed scumbag wanting to kill her to take her Social Security check for a fix? Yet it happens all the time.

Progressives teach their children not to have a Christian morality. They also teach their kids that “life is cheap” by telling them that abortion is a valid option if they “inconvenience” themselves with a pregnancy (due to their “fuck everything that moves” progressive morality).

I’m not making a case for anti-abortion or pro-Christianity or anti-”free love”, but I believe that “progressive” views on abortion, sex, family and religion, combined with Hollywood, have contributed heavily to gun violence seeming like a “solution” to many people. I am saying that the anti-Christian pro-abortion anti-family “I gots to get mine” agenda of progressives, and guns in Hollywood movies, are all the fault of the progressives, and contribute heavily to the prevalence of gun violence.

My brother was an Eagle Scout and participated in an after-school riflemanship program at his public school. When he was a high school senior in 1963 (back when America had a Christian morality), he used to bring his .22 rifle and ammo on the school bus and keep it in his locker for the after-school shooting classes. No one got shot, and no one cared. Whereas if you brought a boy scout pocket knife to school now, you’d be kicked out of school and likely arrested.

Obama’s DHS warns to look out for pro-American right-wing gun nuts. But almost all of the recent mass gun violence was done by people who were anti-American and left wing. The Ft. Hood shooter was anti-American. Even the shooter at the Holocaust Museum was a registered Democrat who hated Fox News.

Never forget, the KKK were Democrats! And the guy who freed the slaves was a Republican. And while we’re at it, Wyoming was the first place to give women the vote. Though that may have just been so some of them would move here!

Gun violence is the fault of the progressives. And it’s immoral that so-called progressives try to take away my guns just because they’ve wrecked so much of the world with their policies. Gun violence in secular New York City and Los Angeles has nothing to do with me in Christian Wyoming. So back the fuck off.

–Michael W. Dean

Gun control is immoral

Monday, January 25th, 2010

So, someone asked me today about “sensible” gun control. I maintain that no such thing exists.

First…

Most people who want to regulate guns don’t know much about them.

This comment on another post on this blog is typical:

I do believe that we do have the right to protect ourselves with a firearm like a shotgun or a rifle. The thing that I’m not convinced on is the need to own assault weapons like an AK-47 or an Uzi.

Here’s the thing: an AK-47 IS a rifle. And a pretty anemic one at that. Any .30 cal deer rifle has MUCH more destructive power. And range. And with a  scope, it’s pretty much a sniper rifle that could kill a man at a quarter mile. (And most deer rifles are .30 cal, it’s pretty cruel to hunt deer with anything smaller, you need to kill deer in one shot, or they suffer.) An AK-47 cannot kill effectively at a quarter mile.

Not that any of that is reassuring to anyone who likes gun control, but you will NEVER get guns out of the hands of the millions of deer hunters in America. Never.

Though the “sporting purpose” mentioned by many gun grabbers (as in “we want to ban anything that does not have a sporting purpose”) has nothing to do with the Second Amendment. The “sporting purpose” crap came from an American adaptation of a Nazi Germany gun control law.

Gun control is immoral because all honest, free men have an innate right to self-defense, on a one-to-one level, like a violent mugger, but also on a larger, “opposing tyranny” level.

The Second Amendment has nothing to do with shooting deer. The right to shoot deer was a given in the rural community of early America. If you couldn’t shoot deer, you’d starve.

The Second Amendment has to do with being able to make sure that the government doesn’t get too large. To protect yourself from government. Though even uttering these words today gets you put on a watch list. Fedzilla has grown to the point that it wants to remove the Second Amendment. And they do it slowly, in bits and pieces. Give ‘em an inch and they take a mile.

Because of the Second Amendment, politicians cannot outright ban guns. So they go after them incrementally, and each bit of gun control (or ammo control, lately) legislation is a step toward the unstated goal of the government having all the guns and the people having none. Once that happens, they can cram anything down your throat, and there is nothing you can do about it.

America was founded by guys who were really pissed.
But if you quote the Founding Fathers now, you’re called a terrorist!

–”Liberty in Shards” by Right Arm of Wyoming

Most politicians who want to outlaw guns don’t do so for love of the public safety. They only do it for power: the power of having the government have the only guns, and the power of getting votes. Politicians love votes, and promising to be “tough on guns” (instead of being tough on actual crime, which is harder) usually gets a few votes with the “think of the children!” parrots.

Back to the original reason for the Second Amendment: you don’t have to use your guns to prevent encroaching tyranny, you only have to have them. And maybe be willing to use them if things get bad enough. And have the skill to do so.

By the way, you need rifles to oppose tyranny. No revolutions were ever won with pistols, and tyranny is not opposed with a shotgun.

“Progressive” leftists tend to be into banning guns, because leftists think that they know what’s best for everyone. People on the right have more trust in people. They don’t need to “nanny” everyone.

But most leftist gun grabbers have never held a gun, so why should they be in charge of regulating them? Here’s a typical gun grabbing leftist, trying to explain the random indicators that defined an “assault weapon” under the “assault weapon ban” that she helped create.

Would you trust someone who is that stupid about pharmaceuticals to regulate medicine? (Never mind, that’s what the Democrats are trying to do with health care.)

Note that she also uses the incorrect term “clip” (should be “mag” or “magazine”) Also, “assault weapon” is a made-up, meaningless term. As is the specious indicators that “defined” one under that law. A pistol grip on a rifle never killed anyone, nor does it help anyone kill anyone. There is something called an “assault rifle” (a full-auto, select fire AK-47 would qualify, so do the guns our boys carry in Iraq, but both of those are already illegal for private citizens in America), but gun grabboids’ definition of “assault weapon” often includes many shotguns and hand guns too. Basically, it banned anything that looked like a military weapon, was black, and looked scary. They banned some very underpowered guns, and didn’t ban some very powerful guns, based entirely on cosmetics. Some gun lovers even called the “assault weapons ban” the “scary looking ugly black gun ban.”

Obama’s boy Eric Holder tried to reinstate the “Assault Weapon” ban last year, and said it was to help Mexico in their War on Drugs! Trying to limit our Constitutional rights to help a foreign country is treasonous, in my opinion.

All gun control has historically led to total gun confiscation, which has always led to tyrants being able to kill dissenters. Hitler, Pol Pot and Stalin all took away the guns before doing the horrible things they’re best known for.

Gun control and gun registration does not prevent crime. There are thousands of gun laws on the books, and not one of them has made anyone safer. They have only made criminals out of law-abiding citizens. Gun control simply disarms citizens. If your daughter were being stalked, would you want her to have to wait ten days to get a gun, when the criminal stalking her likely already has a gun? And while we’re on the subject of waiting periods: if you think they’re a good idea, keep people from buying a gun when they’re enraged, why should there be a waiting periods on your second gun? And your third, fourth, fifth, etc. ?

A lot of places are going after ammo, since they think that’s more Constitutional than going after guns. But limiting the amount of ammo people can get, and requiring paperwork on ammo, will have some dark unintended consequences: criminals breaking into honest follks’ homes to get ammo, and honest folks not being able to practice much. I think people who shoot should practice often, and with a lot of rounds. If someone is having to use a gun in a self-defense situation, the more practice they’ve had, the less likely they are to hit an innocent bystander.

And when asked why I should be able to have a military-pattern semi-auto gun, I say why not? I’m an honest person. Should you be limited to a slow computer with little memory because hackers can work faster on fast computers? I have a military-pattern rifle because who the fuck knows what’s going to come to my door or my neighborhood? If there were an earthquake and people were looting and trying to kill me, en mass, a shotgun and a handgun (which I also have) wouldn’t save me.

Why should my handgun be limited to a ten-round mag? If a criminal (who, by definition, does not respect the law and does not follow it) tries to mug me, starts shooting, why should I have to stop to reload? That could get me killed. (And anyone who says “If ten rounds isn’t enough, you’re not a good shoot” knows nothing about guns or self-defense. Especially when trying to fend off more than one bad guy, and they’re not standing still.)

A common chirp of gun grabboids is “The Founding Fathers didn’t imagine Uzis and AK-47s when they wrote the Second Amendment.” Well, I can guarantee if they did, they would have included that. They had the cutting edge of battle technology at the time.

A good response I’ve heard to “The Founding Fathers didn’t imagine Uzis and AK-47s when they wrote the Second Amendment” is a response about the First Amendment: “I’m willing to only carry a brace of muskets if the New York Times is willing to only publish on hand-run presses and only deliver papers by horseback.”

A lot of people confuse Uzis and AK-47s with machine guns, because both are also available in full-auto (machine gun). Only criminals have those in America. I know people with AK-47s, but they’re legal semi-auto versions.

By the way, I have several semi-auto rifles that are FAR more powerful than an AK-47.

Which brings me to the “Why do you need so many guns?” question. Well, why do you need so many shoes? I have different guns for different things. Plus, I just like guns. I like the history of them (which is why I own a 1943 gun that was actually used to kill actual Nazis), I like the feel of them, the mechanics and the science of them. Why does a stamp collector have so many damn stamps?

My guns in Wyoming don’t effect you in your state. My guns don’t even affect you if you’re my next-door neighbor. Like most gun owners, I’m an honest person. Assault and murder are illegal, and rightfully so. I will not do those things, I wouldn’t do them even if they were legal. So lay off my guns.

Guns hurt far less people than cars and swimming pools. And you don’t need a gun to hurt people. You can kill someone with a rock or a hammer. So keep your immoral desire to control my guns to yourself, and go after actual criminals instead of trying to make me into a criminal.

–Michael W. Dean

Stupid stupid stupid liberals

Sunday, January 24th, 2010

Stupid stupid stupid liberals.

From CNN:

My 68-year-old mother-in-law refuses to take a bath but once a week. Is this healthy or even legally acceptable? Please help.
Is it LEGALLY ACCEPTABLE? Holy fucking hell….liberals want to regulate EVERYTHING. Can you imagine this call?: “Hello…911? My mother-in-law doesn’t bathe as often as I’d like. Please come arrest her.”
Fuck. Fuck these people. They should never have any power, and should probably all be sent at gunpoint to libertarian re-education camps immediately. (Just kidding.)
Reminds me of this:

and this

Are The Tides Turning?

Tuesday, January 19th, 2010

It looks as though the race for the vacant senate seat in Massachusetts has taken a turn against the Democratic Party. In a state as liberal as the Bay State, the election of a Republican by a solid margin cannot bode well for those that wish to experiment with socialism. This very well could be a gaze into the crystal ball concerning the 2010 Mid-term elections. At the very least, it will upset the “super majority” in the senate. Dick Durbin said that if Brown wins, that the Democrats will use reconciliation to force health care through the senate. Now that only 38% approve of the health care joke, and 56% oppose… Please Mr. Durbin, get desperate and send every moderate voter in the country away from your camp.

–Justin West

The thrill up his leg is gone

Tuesday, January 19th, 2010

Chris “I felt this thrill going up my leg from Obama” Matthews is on TV right now covering the crucial Massachusetts Senate campaign…it’s looking like the Republican is winning, and Mathews is laughing about it all, and he’s criticizing Obama.

When MSNBC concedes defeat of their agenda, does that mean they are getting ready to just “back the winner” if the winner switches?

Reminds me of that Kent Brockman line on the Simpsons when he’s reporting about the alien invasion, “I for one welcome our new alien overlords….and as a seasoned broadcast professional, I could help them drum up support.”

Fuck it. I’ll take it. I almost like it.

–Michael W. Dean

MLK owned guns

Monday, January 18th, 2010

Remember all this when any gun grabber (including Obama, who sometimes seems to think he’s MLK Jr. Jr.) demands you give up your guns.

http://www.lesjones.com/posts/004857.shtml

Well before his decision (apparently in 1955) to embrace Ghandian non-violence as the best tactic in the national showdown over civil rights, King had been a committed civil rights activist, but also a man who believed in protecting himself and his family against constant threats of racist violence (which included the bombing of his home).

Accordingly, the pre-Ghandian King had been armed to protect himself and his family — to the point where his home was described by one activist as “an arsenal“:

King would later admit that at the start of the boycott be was not firmly committed to Gandhian principles. He had initially advocated nonviolence not as a way of life but as a practical necessity for a racial minority. When his home was bombed at the end of January, he had cited Jesus– “He who lives by the sword will perish by the sword”– rather than Gandhi in urging angry black neighbors to remain nonviolent. At the time of the bombing, King was seeking a gun permit, and he was protected by armed bodyguards. Only after the bombing did King alter his views on the use of weapons for protection. His reconsideration was encouraged by the arrival in Montgomery of two pacifists who were far more aware than he of Gandhian principles.

Also see The Racist Origins Of Gun Control

Freedom: $228 at WalMart

Sunday, January 17th, 2010

My new little laptop (right) with my standard laptop (left)

If you want to change the world from anywhere, if you want to criticize Eric Holder while on the run from his silly new “hate crime laws“,  if you’re one of the right-wing bloggers he’s unconstitutionally targeting, you need one of the new $228 netbook from eMachines.

They went on sale the day after Christmas, and each WalMart has only ten of them. (As of yesterday, the east-side WalMart in Casper, Wyoming still had four of them.) They’re only in-store, not available via mailorder.

If you can’t find one at WalMart, it’s basically a rebranded version of  this same Acer laptop, which you can buy on Amazon for $298, still a good deal.

This thing works great. It’s easy to type on, the keyboard is almost full sized. It’s got 10.1 inch display, 1GB of RAM, fast 1.6 GHz processor, 250 gig hard drive (!) WiFi and Windows 7 Starter Edition. Windows 7 Starter edition is pretty good, WAY better than the virus known as Vista. Windows 7 Starter has got a few things disabled, the shiny bullshit called Aero (which I would disable anyway), you cannot change the desktop, and you can only run three applications at a time (plus anti-virus). But for blogging, surfing, checking e-mail and such, it rocks.

Blogging at the sheeple

It’s fast enough to run Photoshop, Microsoft Office, even audio editing programs for podcasting while complaining about ironically named “Libertarian Paternalism” that is so loved by the Obama administration, and is destroying America.

The cute little lappie even has a built-in web cam, I used it to take these goofie pix of myself blogging:

So, this laptop is actually improving my already wonderful marriage, I don’t have to go into the other room to use a computer, I can hang out with my wife while she reads. That was hard to do with my larger laptop, but this little two-pound miracle makes it easy.

The pen is mightier than the swoard, but it never hurts to be good with both. The Second Amendment protects the First, so I have a little computer to go with my littlest gun now. Yay!

HOPE? and CHANGE?

Saturday, January 16th, 2010

Great video put together from my friend Chris from the JPFO.

Death threats to me on YouTube

Saturday, January 16th, 2010

Got a nice one today:

suboptimal wrote

This is probably the stupidest video I’ve seen on youtube. You’re a moran!

I replied “The stupidest? THAT would be quite an honor!”

suboptimal wrote

OMFG I know you’re not being sarcastic to me. I don’t know who you think you are or where you’re from but around here we don’t tolerate bullshit like that. If this were on the streets where I’m from, you’d get a cap in your ass, son!

I used to be a nigga on the street tryin’ to kick a beat and now I’ve got a great job as a manager, despite rednecks like yo self trying to keep me down.

We need hate crime laws, but no one needs a god damn bumpkin band putting out anti Obama music.

Peace out.

It was a response to this video:

I don’t know where the guy lives, but I’ll bet he’s posting from his mother’s paneled rec room.

Michael W. Dean

My state of the Union speech, mid-January 2010

Friday, January 15th, 2010

So…..It’s horrible what happened in Haiti. And there have been some really inappropriate comments about it….Pat Robertson saying it’s the fault of Devil worship. (I’m not fan of voodoo, but really don’t believe it can cause natural disasters.) But I’m not sure I disagree with Rush Limbaugh saying “You already give to Haitian relief – it’s called the income tax.”

Then there are the conspiracy theorists saying the US caused the earthquake, to test their new HAARP array in Alaska, the High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program,

The objectives of the HAARP project became the subject of controversy in the mid-1990s, following claims that the antennas could be used as a weapon. A small group of U.S.physicists aired complaints in the Physics and Society letters, charging that the HAARP could be seeking ways to destroy or disable enemy spacecraft or disrupt communications over large portions of the planet. The physicist critics of the HAARP have had little complaint about the project’s current stage, but have expressed fears that it could in the future be expanded into an experimental weapon, especially given that its funding comes from the Office of Naval Research and the Air Force Research Laboratory.

I can’t even touch that theory….can’t wrap my head around the possibility of it. I suppose it’s possible that our gub’mint could be that evil, but I don’t think it’s what happened. I mainly think that there are too many amateur scientists in the world with good equipment who would have detected it.

I can say this: I think that Obama and Rahm “don’t let a crisis go to waste” Emanuel or Eric “shred the Constitution” Holder are going to bring a bunch of Haitian refugees to America, and fast track them to citizenship, just in time to vote Democrat in 2012. MARK MY WORDS.

If you think that’s politicizing a horrible situation, you’re right. But saying it is far less horrible than them DOING IT, which is politicizing in the process.

SPEAKING OF ERIC “SHRED THE CONSTITUTION” HOLDER, how about this?

Black Panther Voter Intimidation Case Dropped – WSJ.com

The episode—which Bartle Bull, a former civil rights lawyer and publisher of the left-wing Village Voice, calls “the most blatant form of voter intimidation I’ve ever seen”—began on Election Day 2008. Mr. Bull and others witnessed two Black Panthers in paramilitary garb at a polling place near downtown Philadelphia. (Some of this behavior is on YouTube.)

One of them, they say, brandished a nightstick at the entrance and pointed it at voters and both made racial threats. Mr. Bull says he heard one yell “You are about to be ruled by the black man, cracker!”

In the first week of January, the Justice Department filed a civil lawsuit against the New Black Panther Party and three of its members, saying they violated the 1965 Voting Rights Act by scaring voters with the weapon, uniforms and racial slurs. In March, Mr. Bull submitted an affidavit at Justice’s request to support its lawsuit.

Holder is refusing to pursue it.

You can be damn sure if it were white people (KKK, Tea Party, take your pick) intimidating black voters, they’d be in prison.

OK, and finally, The Supreme Court is trying a case whereby a sex offender was kept in prison after he’d finished serving his sentence. I think the powers that be intentionally used a kiddie porn guy for this case, because it will elicit a “THINK OF THE CHILDREN! HE MUST BE KEPT IN PRISON, FOR THE GOOD OF THE NATION!” response. The thing is, if this flies, they’ll eventually be able to keep anyone in prison for anything, just based on futurecrime.

Obama would love this.

Meanwhile, he and the Democrats are, behind closed doors (in violation of his campaign promises), selling out America and taking over 1/6 of our economy.

We live in strange times, folks. I’m worried. How about you?

I’ll say this: one of the reasons I have guns is to protect my home and loved ones from looters in a breakdown situation like Haiti’s earthquake or Hurricane Katrina. I would NOT want to have to wait for the government to protect me while roving gangs go door to door using violence to take what they want.

Me and my friend Nunzio did a good double-ender podcast yesterday, on this and a lot of other important subjects. Check it out.

–Michael W. Dean

AN OPEN LETTER TO THE REPUBLICAN PARTY

Wednesday, January 13th, 2010

AN OPEN LETTER TO THE REPUBLICAN PARTY
From: Michael W. Dean
Wyoming contact, Republican Liberty Caucus

Dear Republican Party,

In the next presidential election, and in all state and local elections, you need to support candidates who are true Republicans and genuine lovers of liberty. The party will not succeed if it does not run candidates who truly understand and respect the Constitution, including the Bill of Rights.

America was once a constitutionally limited republic, and it needs to be returned to that. In the past 100 years, and especially in the past 20 years, America has been reduced to a so-called “democracy”, where 51% of the people can rob and over-regulate 49% of the people.

A true constitutional republic could last in perpetuity; whereas democracies historically survive for 200 to 300 years. After that, they devolve into socialism or oligarchies, as the people who do not want to work vote into office people who will let them not work, and can pay them to do so by stealing from those who do work.

We are at a tipping point. America is in her 235th year. The next presidential election can determine if we regain our constitutional republic, or slide into a permanent “progressive” majority helmed by a deluded far-left who do not listen to the people, and are chomping at the bit to bankrupt us into a socialist oligarchy. Those folks see Republicans not as a force to work with in a bipartisan capacity, but as an impediment to robbing from the productive so they can “give” to those who have no desire or ability to produce.

If Washington followed the Constitution, it would barely matter who was president. The checks and balances would work. But ours has been co-opted into a popularity contest wherein people vote for the candidate with the slickest tongue and the shortest slogan….especially slogans like “HOPE” and “CHANGE.” As we’ve seen, these basically mean “Get me in, and you’ll find out my actual core beliefs later, when it’s too late.”

If the President and Congress followed the Constitution, DC would not be permitted to arbitrarily dictate most of what a citizen does in a given state. We need candidates who stand up for the Constitution, including the true meaning the Interstate Commerce Clause, and the original intent of all parts of the Bill of Rights, especially the First, Second and Tenth Amendments.

If the Republican Party establishment supports a spend-o-crat RINO (Republican in Name Only) in the next presidential election, you will guarantee a victory for the Democratic Party.

The Democrat Party used to have some principles, but has lately been taken over by a few dozen extreme leftist “progressives” with radical ideas and ties. They think they know what’s best for everyone, consider the Constitution a detriment, and consider Republicans a speed bump to be routed around behind closed doors.

America has woken up to the waste, “legal” stealing and “legal” bribes that can only lead to the destruction of America. The Democrats are largely responsible, but some Republicans have helped along the way. If you run a RINO for president, you will guarantee AINO (America in Name Only) in the near future, and forever.

The American people have finally woken up. Americans who have never been active in politics have taken to the streets by the millions. This is just the beginning.

The Democrats have been exposed for their gross spending of other people’s money at all levels, but in doing so have also shown that the Democrats aren’t the only ones. Some Republicans have contributed to this as well.

If you run a constitutional candidate like Gary Johnson, Tom Coburn, Jim DeMint, or Paul (Ron or Rand, take your pick) in the next presidential election, you’ll have a chance. I’ll vote Republican, and help out. So will millions of libertarians, tea partiers, swing voters, independents and even some of the smarter disgruntled Democrats. All combined, this will be enough to make the difference in the outcome of that election.

But 2012 is likely the very last year where even this will be possible. The leftists are working 24/7 to stack the deck against the possibility of retaining any America in America.

The Republican Party needs to run constitutional candidates, not only because it’s the right thing to do, but because it will keep the party from being perceived as “irrelevant naysayers” without any of their own ideas on how to make the country better. Running constitutional candidates will keep you from becoming a footnote in history. And even that footnote will likely be erased with time when a permanent socialist majority takes control of all media and education.

This road to serfdom can possibly be avoided, but it’s up to the Republican Party. You must run Barry Goldwater candidates, not George W. Bush, John McCain, or Rudy Giuliani candidates. Otherwise you’re going to end up with an America you don’t recognize, while you cling to your “Don’t blame me, I voted Republican” buttons.

Politics has become far too complicated. Lawmakers don’t think they’re doing their jobs if they don’t enact dozens of new laws and endless pork-barrel projects to “bring home the bacon” every day. This leads to honest folks becoming criminals, and the federal government having a stranglehold over every single aspect of our lives. We need candidates who will simplify, not complicate. We need candidates who will leash the beast, not feed the beast.

The Republican Party must run candidates who follow the Constitution and understand natural law… people who believe in their heart of hearts that government does not grant rights, does not restrict rights, but has only one legitimate role: protecting rights.

Our Founders are likely rolling in their graves at what the Democrats are doing now. But the Founders surely wouldn’t be pleased with what some in the Republican Party have done, either.

Why make us pick from the lesser of two evils? Here’s a novel idea: how about running someone who’s NOT evil!

Try it, you’ll like it. And America will be better for it.

–Michael W. Dean
http://www.libertarianpunk.com

Nullification Rally In Texas

Sunday, January 10th, 2010

To expound on my blog about nullification of “health care reform” I wanted to share information about a rally being held in Austin, TX. Several groups led by The Alliance of Texans Against Government Controlled Healthcare are hosting the rally. This event will take place January 16th, 2010 at 2:00 PM on the South side of the Texas Capitol Building. According to their website, it is “A rally to voice our support across Texas. We are serious about nullification and want the governor to call a special session to protect us from the federal government.”

The Texas Legislature meets for 140 days every two years. The latest session was adjourned in February of 2009, so a special session would need to be called in order to nullify any federal legislation. The power to call that special session rests with Governor Rick Perry. Gov. Perry has made bold statements in regards to the federal takeover of health care.

“… I’m certainly willing and ready for the fight if this administration continues to try to force their very expansive government philosophy down our collective throats.” July 23, 2009.

The time for talk is drawing to an end, and it is now time to see if Gov. Perry is willing to take the steps necessary to make the will of the people known. The current administration has promised transparency and honest debate, but has resorted to meetings behind closed doors, political bribery of representatives, and rushing legislation through in the cover of darkness. The time has come for the states to stand up and say “ENOUGH!”

For more information, please see http://www.notintexas.org/.

-Justin West

Free feisty libertarian punk rock MP3s for our readers

Friday, January 8th, 2010

So….for the time being, our readers may download the RIGHT ARM OF WYOMING CD free!

DOWNLOAD is HERE, right click to save.

You can still buy the CD for only 12 bucks, and once the initial pressing of 1000 is gone (fairly soon), I’m probably not repressing. I’m on to making the second CD now, and I don’t like to “paint the same picture twice.”

WHY ARE YOU GIVING THIS AWAY?

I make enough to get by on my day job, writing tech books and how-to stuff. Even though this music is better than most stuff done by people who “define themselves as being in a band”, that’s not me. At least not anymore. I have no plans to tour or get signed, I’ve been there and done that. Touring the gin mills of the world, playing for beer and gas money, and waking up next to hot crazy women whose name I can’t remember….well, that’s no longer in my plans. I’ve done the hell out of it, and lived to tell the tale, and that’s enough.

This music exists to pass on a message. Giving away downloads isn’t taking any food off the table, and I’ve also found that people who download don’t usually buy things. So I’ll still sell as many CDs. Maybe more, given my past experiences doing things like this.

WHAT’S IN THE DOWNLOAD?

It’s a 101-meg zip file of all the MP3s of the new album. Also included is the lyric sheet and cover art. It takes about 90 seconds to download on DSL. The MP3s are high-quality encodes (192k / 44,100 k, 16-bit joint stereo MP3s, properly tagged). Download, unzip, and you can drag them right into your iPod, iPhone, or whatever chromed-robot-turd folks are carrying this week, and they’ll light up your day.

WHAT SHOULD WE DO?

Tell two friends. Blog. Twitter, Facebook, or whatever you kids are doing these days. Get this shit out there.

Also available on BitTorrent, if you prefer (please seed if you do that.)

Michael W. Dean

From Angry Peasant Records. Angry Peasant Records is a division of the Nestlandia Institute Libertarian Think Tank

SONG LISTING:

1. GET OFF MY PROPERTY!
2. MY GUN KEEPS YOU HONEST
3. REDISTRIBUTION OF THEFT
4. GOVERNMENT IS A COLLECTIVE HALLUCINATION
5. GUN CONTROL GETS WOMEN RAPED
6. LIBERTY IN SHARDS
7. FREAKY LIBERAL MAMMAL SEX
8. FAKIN’ THE RACE CARD
9. SINGLE CRACKLING BLUE FLASH
10. WE ARE THE GOOD GUYS!
11. US Bill of Rights (read by Mrs. Dean)
12. LETTER TO A YOUNG ME (SPOKEN)
13. MY GUN KEEPS YOU HONEST – CLEAN VERSION FOR RADIO

Obama’s transgressions

Thursday, January 7th, 2010

Today all the news networks did a couple hours of teasers, saying “Obama is going to make a shocking announcement today.”

I thought he was going to announce “While in our secret closed-door health care meeting, me and my fellow socialist Dems found a way to change the Constitution and ban guns. And we’ve also made a deal to make France the 51st state. And I’m putting Osama bin Laden in charge of the TSA, because he knows how those terrorist folks think.”

But that’s just me and where my head goes with things. At this point, those are about the only things Obama could say that would shock me.

The “shocking” thing advertised was just Obama pretending to have some accountability for security breakdowns. Just him trying to be as un-George Bush as his focus groups could come up with.

Yawn.

The reason not much Obama could do would shock me is everything he’s done already. Every few days for the first six months or so of Obama’s reign, my jaw dropped at something the man or his cronies have done to America. My jaw stopped dropping around June or July.

Here’s a list I started a while back. I’ve given up updating it:

I was mainly looking for
– Anything unconstitutional
– Broken campaign promises
– Lying
– Bad decisions that are bad for America
– Just bad presidenting (i.e. stuff that would appall you even if you were a Democrat, albeit a smart one)

OK, I’ll start, with all I remember, or have heard that he’s “ALLEGEDLY” done:

1. broke campaign promise of “no new taxes” by taxing cigarettes and electricity, and trying to mandate health care with a fine and jail time for non-compliance.
2. Trying to send all kids to public school 24/7
3. Talked about reinstating “assault weapon ban”, (but changed his mind, for now)
4. Let his attorney general go after the CIA for doing what they had to do.
5. Wanted to release photos of waterboarding
6. Has an idiot VP (who was only there for the white vote) who has only said about four things, all of them stupid and/or threats to national security
7. Has a DHS that believes that most white middle-aged conservatives, libertarians, third-party voters and many vets are potential terrorists
8. Appoints “czars” (for example Van Jones and Cass Sunstein) who literally used to be terrorists, and who still are communist
9. Puts a guy (Geithner) in charge of the Fed and IRS who couldn’t figure out how to use “TurboTax”
10. Appointed a bunch of czars waiting in the wings who:
a. Want to give animals the right to sue
b. Want to outlaw hunting
c. Want to make it illegal NOT to donate your organs when you die
d. Want to use forced sterilization on people
e. Want to be able to shut down parts of the Internet
f. Are pervert ex-druggies in charge of schools
g. etc. etc. ect.
11. Obama CLEARLY said in pre-election interviews that he wants to “redistribute the wealth” (and used that term), but says he’s not socialist!
12. Wants Congress to sign a 1000-page heath care bill without giving them time to read it
13. Wants to close Gitmo with one hand, while opening many much-worse Gitmos with the other
14. Doesn’t understand 8th grade math. Thinks he can spend our way out of debt.
15. Claims he didn’t know much about ACORN, and didn’t know that they got federal money: AFTER ACORN was a large part of getting him elected.
16. Continually apologizes for America
17. Said “America is the largest Muslim nation”
18. “A new era of transparency. 5 days of public review for any major legislation.” Where?
19. More warrantless wiretapping.
20. Claimed “No tax increase on those making less than 250k. Not a dime!”, then increased their taxes, and continues to do so
21. Says the Economic Recovery Act had “no pork in it”
22. Dropping charges against armed, uniformed men, who were intentionally intimidating voters at polling place(s) on election day
23. Says he’s not a socialist while acting like a socialist.
24. Says he’s not increasing the size of the Federal Government while increasing the size of the Federal Government.
25. Broke campaign promise to rescind “don’t ask don’t tell”
26. Broke campaign promise to decriminalize marijuana (and laughed at people who smoke marijuana when asked about it)
27. Cap ‘n’ trade. Immoral, stealing from producers of wealth and jobs, just creates a new false economy (and a new “stock market”) and fortunes for his liberal buddies.
28. Cash for Clunkers. Didn’t work. Who would want to put health care in charge of the folks who bungled Cash for Clunkers?
29. Disrespects the 2nd Amendment (and the 1st Amendment, when it doesn’t favor him)
30. Let the NEA use Fed grant money to produce propaganda with his image on it
31. Posted photos of himself with the daughters of leader of Spain, illegal in Spain (for security of the daughters)
32. Allowed that “show of force” low flyover of Manhattan that scared the hell out of everybody
33. Expanded extraordinary rendition while simultaneously claiming he was ending torture.
34. Campaigned on “more transparency”, has a bitchin’ YouTube channel and MySpace page, but is having technical difficulties getting the health care bill online
35.-3029. Khalid Sheikh Mohammed To Be Tried In Civilian Court

That last one would be #35, but I made it “#35 through #3029.”
I added in the 2,995 people killed on 9/11.

That’s all I can think of for now. I know there’s a lot more.

Michael W. Dean

I’m never flying again.

Monday, January 4th, 2010

The current administration, filled with people who will not call a terrorist a terrorist, and issues warnings about the possibility white people going postal but never use the “Muslim extremist” tag on Muslim extremists, have a new plan: SHOCK COLLARS FOR AIRLINE PASSENGERS!

from The Washington Times:

Just when you thought you’ve heard it all…

A senior government official with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has expressed great interest in a so-called safety bracelet that would serve as a stun device, similar to that of a police Taser®. According to a video (below) found at the Lamperd Less Lethal, Inc. website, the bracelet would be worn by all airline passengers (video also shown below).

This bracelet would:

• Take the place of an airline boarding pass

• Contain personal information about the traveler

• Be able to monitor the whereabouts of each passenger and his/her luggage

• Shock the wearer on command, completely immobilizing him/her for several minutes

Here are my thoughts: First they try it on airline passengers. Then they try it on paroled felons. Then they try it on loud complainers (like me). Then they try it on everybody, all the time. (Including you.)

These people get an inch, and take a mile.

Also, couldn’t a hijacker cut off the bracelet? And couldn’t someone hack the system and shock a whole plane full (or a whole airport full) of innocents?

My alternative? Allow honest citizens to be armed on airplanes, using frangible ammo that cannot pierce the skin of the plane. Of course they’ll never do that, because it is free, would work, and they don’t like their “subjects ” to be armed.

Michael W. Dean

It’s not nuts to carry a gun in your front yard (and everywhere)

Monday, January 4th, 2010

Officials investigate Lockwood death


My friend Justin in Montana just sent this:

Michael,

I’m not fishing for sympathy, I only tell you about this because you’re the person I consider most likely to convince people that having the means to protect themselves is a good idea.

The dead man is my brother-in-law, we had our differences, but we also had a deep respect for each other.  He was not only my family, he was my friend.  My brother-in-law was stabbed to death on his front porch early this morning by a man who he’s known and been friends with since childhood.  My brother-in-law’s house is right across the road from mine.

Michael, I have to admit that I’ve often thought you perhaps a bit paranoid for carrying a gun while out in your yard, especially in Casper, Wyoming.  You now have my solemn promise that I will never think of you in that light again.

Most people think they would never need a gun that close to home, especially when walking outside to talk to a “friend”.  My brother-in-law didn’t own a gun, and even if he had, it might not  have saved his life in this case, but it might have.  Empty handed, and caught totally off guard, he didn’t have a chance.  My home is now filled with weeping family members, many of them children, 3 of the children now fatherless.  All of this is due to senseless violence, and a defenseless victim.

Repost this anywhere you would like, use part of it, use all of it, I don’t care.  If it convinces just one person to take the steps necessary to protect themselves, then my brother-in-law did not die for nothing.  I refuse to believe that the world is a terrible and ugly place, but there are definitely terrible and ugly people in it.

Take care of yourself,
Justin

=====-

Follow up, the next day:

Police caught the guy.

Old booking photo:

Recent booking photo:

Libertarian Party of Florida County Chair says Republican Party way to go for 2010

Monday, January 4th, 2010

(Michael W. Dean’s comment: I like this, I think it’s the “way to go”, and it’s where I’ve been leaning since before I started working with the RLC.)

(Repost from Libertarian Republican blog):

Libertarian Party of Florida County Chair says Republican Party way to go for 2010

Vows to switch registration to vote for Marco Rubio

Thomas Rhodes of the Citrus County Libertarian Party recently wrote a column on the official County LP website which he hosts, that for 2010, he’s going Republican. His comments came in reaction to an editorial written by a fellow third-party advocate Henry Lamb, writing in World Net Daily, titled “Remove the Marxist Majority.” From WND:

An objective analysis of the situation leads to only one conclusion: Republicans must regain the majority in the 2010 election.

The quickest way to political power is to take control of the Republican Party, in every precinct, in every county, in every state and, finally, across the nation.

There are many great candidates working hard to gain recognition, funds and ballot access in several conservative political parties. Most are working in vain. These candidates should run as Republicans in Republican primaries, and then all join in support of the winning candidate. Any conservative candidate who has any chance to be elected would have an even better chance of getting elected as a Republican than as a third-party candidate.

All conservative third parties should put their party-building on hold for a year and descend upon the Republican Party en masse, demanding that their county and every state adopt a strong, Constitution-based platform and offer only candidates whose life demonstrates respect for the Constitution. Send the mealy-mouthed RINOs packing, and present a slate of candidates who honor the Constitution and the American values that are being trashed by the Marxist majority.

Rhodes reacts with this posting at the official Libertarian Party of Citrus County website:

As much as I love the Libertarian Party, and am a libertarian at heart, and as much as I despise the big business Republican Party, ending the evil and socialist destruction of the country caused by the Democrats is more important than promoting a truly constitutionally minded libertarian that cannot win. Because Florida is a closed primary state, and because the Libertarian Party candidate cannot win, as distasteful as it is, I’m going to swallow my pride and until after the primaries next year I’m temporarily registering as a republican, to support Rubio in the primary, although not a Libertarian, his views are closest to libertarian views, and he is the most libertarian candidate running who has any reasonable chance of winning. The socialist in republican clothing Crist must not be sent to Washington. There are enough wishy washy republicans with no principle except the dollar there already.

Sidenote: Popular Libertarian syndicated radio talk show host Neal Boortz recently moved to Florida. On his website Neals Nuze, he announced that upon becoming a Florida resident he switched his registration from Libertarian Party to Republican Party, so that he could vote for Rubio.


What can Congress legally do?

Saturday, January 2nd, 2010

Congress has no powers — none — other than the ones listed at the end of this post. If your representative is doing anything not on this list, e-mail em, ask ‘em why they’re defying the Constitution, and send ‘em this list.

A lot of what Congress claims they can do, when they’re doing something they can’t do, is based on “creative” interpretations of the Interstate Commerce Clause.

Nancy Pelosi, when asked “What in the Constitution gives Congress the right to enact universal health care”, she said “Are you serious“? (As in “Constitution? Are you serious? I’m Nancy fuckin’ Pelosi! I don’t have to read that old crap!”)

She later followed up, after consulting with her legal beagles, that it was the Interstate Commerce Clause that “allowed” Congress to force required healthcare down everyone’s throat.

Yet when states try to assert States’ Rights, particularly through The 10th Amendment…

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

–The 10th Amendment of the Bill of Rights of the Constitution of the United States

…the FedGov usually says “Oh no you don’t!” And the state says “Why not?” and the Feds say “BECAUSE WE SAY SO!”

The FedGov did this to Tennessee when Tennessee tried to assert that guns and ammo made, sold and used only WITHIN the state, did not fall under the purvue of the FedGov.

Wyoming is putting a 10th Amendment demand on the ballot in 2010. It will likely pass. Wish us luck enforcing it!

10th Amendment Resolutions
These non-binding resolutions, often called “state sovereignty resolutions” do no carry the force of law. Instead, they are intended to be a statement of the legislature of the state. They play an important role, however.

If you owned an apartment building and had a tenant not paying rent, you wouldn’t show up with an empty truck to kick them out without first serving notice. That’s how we view these Resolutions – as serving “notice and demand” to the Federal Government to “cease and desist any and all activities outside the scope of their constitutionally-delegated powers.” Follow-up, of course, is a must.

These people in Congress, primarily Democrats, are NOT DOING THEIR JOBS. They’re being tyrannical. So are most of the folks in Obama’s cabinet. They are fucking around with our lives. They’re stealing our God-given and Constitutionally guaranteed liberties….all while smiling and standing in front of American flags (which makes me sick). 2010 midterm elections will give the People a chance to speak by throwing the Democrat bums out of office. Some say it’s too late, we’re doomed. I say it’s not. I’m encouraging everyone I can to vote in those elections. For liberty leaning Republicans. Start educating yourself now. The Republican Liberty Caucaus is a good place to start.

SO, WHAT CAN CONGRESS LEGALLY DO?

(From the Constitution of the United States)

Enumerated powers of Congress:

  • Section 8: The Congress shall have power To lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts and excises, to pay the debts and provide for the common defence and general welfare of the United States; but all duties, imposts and excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;
  • To borrow money on the credit of the United States;
  • To regulate commerce with foreign nations, and among the several states, and with the Indian tribes;
  • To establish a uniform rule of naturalization, and uniform laws on the subject of bankruptcies throughout the United States;
  • To coin money, regulate the value thereof, and of foreign coin, and fix the standard of weights and measures;
  • To provide for the punishment of counterfeiting the securities and current coin of the United States;
  • To establish post offices and post roads;
  • To promote the progress of science and useful arts, by securing for limited times to authors and inventors the exclusive right to their respective writings and discoveries;
  • To constitute tribunals [courts] inferior to the Supreme Court;
  • To define and punish piracies and felonies committed on the high seas, and offenses against the law of nations;
  • To declare war, grant letters of marque and reprisal, and make rules concerning captures on land and water;
  • To raise and support armies, but no appropriation of money to that use shall be for a longer term than two years;
  • To provide and maintain a navy;
  • To make rules for the government and regulation of the land and naval forces;
  • To provide for calling forth the militia to execute the laws of the union, suppress insurrections and repel invasions;
  • To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the militia, and for governing such part of them as may be employed in the service of the United States, reserving to the states respectively, the appointment of the officers, and the authority of training the militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;
  • To exercise exclusive legislation in all cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten miles square) as may, by cession of particular states, and the acceptance of Congress, become the seat of the government of the United States, and to exercise like authority over all places purchased by the consent of the legislature of the state in which the same shall be, for the erection of forts, magazines, arsenals, dockyards, and other needful buildings;-And
  • To make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution the foregoing powers, and all other powers vested by this Constitution in the government of the United States, or in any department or officer thereof.

SO…when you see your representatives breaking the law (and you SHOULD know who your reps are!), you can contact ‘em here:
https://writerep.house.gov/writerep/welcome.shtml

I did.

Or if you’d rather not do it through the Gov’s site, you can do it through the NRA site:
http://capwiz.com/nra/dbq/officials/

–Michael W. Dean

“I’m not crazy! You’re the one who’s crazy!” – almost END-OF-THE-DECADE FIRESIDE CHAT FROM MWD

Thursday, December 31st, 2009

By Michael W. Dean

As we smash headlong into yet another decade, the fifth I’ve participated in during my 45 spins around this big blue ball, I reflect on the past and look toward the future. And the main thought that strikes me is ‘WHAT THE FUCK?????”

I really long for the days when I didn’t have to think about politics all the time. When I talked with friends about movies, music, art, dreams, life, love. Now most of what I think about is “THOSE LIBERALS ARE FUCKING CRAZY! THEY’RE KILLING EVERYTHING THAT’S GOOD!”

The ironic thing is, they love to call us (conservatives and libertarians) crazy. And selfish. Crazy for not wanting to regulate everything. Selfish for not wanting to be robbed at gunpoint for leftist “social justice” programs.

And it really is robbery at gunpoint. If you refuse to pay taxes, police will come to your house. If you refuse to come out, they’ll come in, point guns at your head, and take you to jail. All taxation, beyond the bare minimum outlined in the Constitution is theft. The government has no resources, and has to take my money to give you anything. And they do everything far less efficiently than the private sector.

I am a reasonable, peaceful man. And I’m happy to live in America, which really is, to quote patriot Boston T. Party, “the sickest patient in the cancer ward.” And he said that a long time ago, America has gotten a lot more sick recently.

And to quote Dead Kennnedy’s singer and head rabble rouser Jello Biafra,

I’m thankful I live in a place
Where I can say the things I do
Without being taken out and shot
So I’m on guard against the goons
Trying to take my rights away
We’ve got to rise above the need for cops and laws

(I love these lyrics, but I find it ironic that the guy who penned them believed in the “Hope and Change” of Obama, the “BIGGER bigger problem we’ve got now“, and is disappointed that Obama’s not the Second Coming of Christ.)

I don’t want to be taken out and shot. I shouldn’t be, I don’t break any laws, but I think that the folks in “power” now may start changing the laws. And I think Obama, Holder, Pelosi et al. may just be the “kinder, gentler” Lenins that paves way for a Stalin in a few years, if we’re not careful.

Execution of 56 Polish civilians in Bochnia during the German occupation of Poland; December 18, 1939

How do I deal with wanting to scream “THESE LIBERALS ARE CRAZY, AND THEY’RE STEALING FROM ME!”? Well…I live my life. I love sweetly on my wife. I talk to her, and listen to her. She’s the smartest person I know. I hug my cats. I say the Serenity Prayer.

God, grant me the serenity
To accept the things I cannot change;
The courage to change the things that I can;
And the wisdom to know the difference.

I work on political activism, gleefully writing feisty blog posts in the middle of the night, with a gun on my desk and a much bigger gun a few feet away.

I also try to educate younger people, being the “hip old grandpa Simpson of punk rock” and a few of them do listen to me…sometimes. I also work with various groups…some concerned with trying to get people to vote, some who don’t think voting works. But both have agendas similar to mine: liberty.

Then I wonder if maybe being an activist isn’t trying to “change the things I can’t.” But then I realize that when they drag us all off to the camps, or more likely, when America is turned into a horrible politically correct anti-utopia resembling Brave New World (or more likely, Demolition Man), I’ll want to at least be able to say to myself “Well, I tried.”

I thing about the fact that 6% of all people are sociopathic, about 12% will inherently follow sociopaths, and probably 20% are narcissists. That’s not quite a majority, but it’s close enough to make it hell for those of us who are decent in a Constitutional Republic that’s been dulled down to a “democracy” where “51% of the people can tyrannize 49%.” And right now, a room full of people in Congress are ramming shit down our throat that according to a recent non-biased Rasmussen pole, 55% of the country is against.

Yet THEY (liberals, leftists, socialist Americans, statists and the uneducated children who are allowed to vote because “everyone’s voice needs to be heard“) (Thank you, Ted Kennedy, you fat, dead, commie homicidal fuck) call US (conservatives, libertarians, tea party people and Republicans) “CRAZY.” “Crazy” is the most common five-letter four-letter word I’ve heard in the past year.

And it doesn’t even have to be verified. I don’t remember a sanity panel convening on my behalf. It’s one of those non-logic leftist tricks. You turn a person into a “thing” so you can dismiss them easier. “Crazy tea bagger.” It really is like calling someone a “racist” or a “drunken Irishman.” Calling someone “crazy” is just turning a person into a thing. And things are easier to throw away than people.

I think about the idea that “All Democracies fail between 200 and 300 years, because people who don’t want to work vote in people who will let them.” I look at my new calender and see that we’re entering year 234 in that range. Before I give up and say “Oh well, we’ve had a good run….” I want to complain a little more. I have to complain a little more. Besides, I can still say what I want without being taken out and shot, and the way things are going, I may find a time in my life when I can’t say the things I want without being taken out and shot….SO..

WHAT’S SO CRAZY ABOUT US?

Seriously…I want any smart liberal, leftist (Berube, I’m looking at you), socialist American, or statist reading this to please comment and tell me how ANYTHING IS CRAZY on the following list of common agendas and ideals of conservatives, libertarians, tea partiers and Republicans. Tell me in logical and uncertain terms, WHAT’S CRAZY ABOUT THIS? (I don’t really need to hear from the uneducated children who think their voice should count. Because if you can’t find my state on a map, can’t find Iraq on a map, cannot tell me how many US senators there are, and what the Electoral College is, let alone what Austrian Economics is, I really don’t think your voice should count.)

SO…..Tell me…WHAT’S SO CRAZY ABOUT

  • Wanting “representatives” who listen to us, instead of dismissing us as crazy?
  • Wanting to control what we do in our homes?
  • Wanting to choose what we eat and what we listen to, without being nannied into compliance?
  • Not wanting to be taxed to death?
  • Not wanting to pay for crack babies and abortions if you don’t smoke crack and don’t like abortions?
  • Not apologizing for America at every turn?
  • Thinking the people who make our laws should not be above the law?
  • Thinking less laws is better than more laws?
  • Being able to do 8th grade math and knowing 10th grade history to realize that you can’t fix a recession by printing more money?
  • Wanting the private corporation (that pretends to be a government agency) that prints your money to be audited?
  • Wanting a President who calls bankers “fat cats” to quit appointing the fattest, greediest bankers in the world to his cabinet?
  • Wanting our President to call terrorists what they are: terrorists?
  • Not liking a President who wants to take away everyone’s money and rewrite the Constitution?
  • Saying that disliking a tyrant doesn’t make you racist?
  • Being upset about bribes being taken to ram something horrible down our throats?
  • Questioning boldly?
  • Wanting to keep our guns?
  • Complaining that the guy in charge of taxes didn’t pay his taxes?
  • Thinking corporations should be allowed to fail?
  • Thinking that “redistribution of wealth” and “social justice” are criminal?
  • Wanting to educate our own children, instead of letting the government indoctrinate and brainwash them?
  • Not destroy our economy because popular pseudo-science says that “the sky is falling!”?
  • Not being in favor of letting unlimited immigration choke our limited resources?

  • Not being racist just because you’re not in favor of letting unlimited immigration choke our limited resources?
  • Not voting for smiling charismatic evil fools with shadowy agendas and one-word “I’ll fill in the details later” platforms?
  • I’ll think of more later.

The government will NOT fix everything. The government has a long history of fucking up and bankrupting most everything it touches. (All governments do.) I love America, but I fear my government. As we usher in the new decade, remember what Ronald Reagan said, “The nine most terrifying words in the English language are ‘I’m from the government and I’m here to help’.”

We may be reaching a tipping point in a divided America, but many Americans today are pussies.

The Whiskey Rebellion in 1791 was fought over taxes imposed to pay for the Revolutionary War, taxes which were higher than the taxes that war was fought over. And between manipulated inflation and Congress after Congress who consider their position (on both sides of the aisle) an excuse to loot via tax & pork, taxes have gone up over 1000% since then. But we’re just complainin‘, man.

But also, like I said, I’m a fairly peaceful guy….we are fairly peaceful people. But you can only back a sweet cat into a corner far enough before tasting some teeth and claws on your ankle. But that’s a different post for another day…..

Churchill said, “If you’re not a liberal at twenty you have no heart, if you’re not a conservative at forty you have no brain”. This explains why, without action, we may be doomed. Children, hippies, leftists (and many “anarchist” punk rockers who are actually socialists) all have a lot in common…including thinking that “wealth is a crime”, “everything should be free, man”, “the government will fix everything“,”the rich should support the poor” and that some nanny-parent group of old men in suits and ties needs to protect us from ourselves at every turn.

“May you live in interesting times.”

–Chinese curse

As we slam into the new decade, I try to be hopeful. I even look at all this in geological time, to try to put it into perspective. If you represent the time from the creation of the earth to now as a 24-hour clock, humans appeared three minutes ago. I doubt we’ve even got five more minutes left. We, all humans, are but chalk on the sidewalk, waiting for the rain.

My life and my thoughts feel important to me, but my words will likely not be disseminating via radio from an orbiting pod-bot 10,000 years hence. In the last decade I’ve reached more humans than most, but it’s unlikely any of the million-and-a-half dollars retail in paperback books with my name on them that have been sold since 1990 will be around in 100 years. My websites will likely go dark a few years after I’m rounded up and shot. I believe in God, but not with the certainty of some Christians so I don’t have the “What can they do, send me home?” non-fear of death. (I actually kind of envy that in people. Even though I don’t have it.)

I try to be hopeful. I polish my writing skills, polish my rifle skills, I exercise my First and Second Amendment rights daily. I clutch my wonderful wife, hug my cats, and I try to speak out.

I try not to watch too much TV, just enough to stay informed without drowning in worry.

I (begrudgingly) pay all my taxes, and don’t even jaywalk. But they’ll might still try to drag me off and shoot me at some point.

I will not go gently.

But I do feel hopeful, and I am grateful for all I have. My life is damn wonderful…and I should have been dead by age 30. In fact, I planned that. I wanted to be famous and dead by 30.

But somehow by the grace of something bigger than myself, I’ve got something much better: slightly infamous…but more importantly, I am loved and healthy and happy at 45. It certainly beats dead and famous at 30.

So let this decade come, me and my wife; and my cats and my blog and my rifle are ready for whatever it brings.

Michael W. Dean,
Casper, Wyoming,
5:29 A.M., December 31, 2009

Alaskan Independence Party

Thursday, December 31st, 2009

Being the self-titled “Official Alaskan Anarchist” at Libertarian Punk, I feel I should make more known this great little group, The Alaskan Independence Party, or AIP. True, while they’re not anarchists but minarchists, I still like them. A small government is much preferable to a big government, and is a step in the right direction.

AIP was founded in the 1970’s by Joe Vogler, a colorful man who once said Alaska should “Nuke the glaciers and build a freeway to Juneau”. His dream was for Alaskans to achieve independence under a minimal government, fully responsive to the people, promoting a peaceful and lawful means of resolving differences.

The AIP’s platform was originally built around the fact that Alaska’s vote for statehood did not give all the options (Statehood, Territorial Status, Commonwealth Status, or Independence, but the ballot only had the first two). Also, American military personnel were allowed to vote. This goes against international law that says only the civilian population of a territory may vote.

The AIP is now the third largest political party in Alaska. Its platform has changed throughout the years into supporting staying in the Union, but perhaps under territorial status. They also support such things as the abolition of property taxes, the privatization of government services, the right of jurors to judge the law as well as the facts according to their conscience (see You fought the law, and you won by MWD), to seek the complete repatriation of the public lands held by the federal government to the state and people of Alaska in conformance with Article 1, Section 8, Clause 17, of the federal constitution, and in general to support Alaskans ahead of other US citizens.

Overall they are a good, liberty minded group, who have fought for Alaska’s rights since their inception. It should also be noted that in 1990 the AIP had a candidate elected as Governor, though he did not push for Alaskan independence.

-J.D. Melvin

The Will of the People Be Damned

Wednesday, December 30th, 2009

If I hear one more person talk about how the United States is a democracy I am going to break their teeth out with a ball-peen hammer.  I doubt these people even know what, exactly, a democracy is.  I can’t remember the last time I’ve heard this nation referred to as a “Constitutional Republic” by anyone in our major media or even by the President of the United States, who is apparently a Constitutional scholar.  Republicans, don’t gloat, George W. Bush was also using the word out of context as well.

We hear this term, this catch phrase, “the will of the people”, bandied about every time someone wants to, oh, I don’t know, take away the right of gay & lesbian couples to marry.  Notice how they never have ballot initiatives to stop state governments from spending themselves into monstrous debt?  California could have used their ballot process in 2008 to do something about the fact that they’re flat broke.  They could have worked to rein in out-of-control spending.  Instead, the process was abused by out of state interests, most notably the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints (the Mormons) and the Knights of Columbus (a Catholic organization), who funneled millions of dollars into a campaign designed to rescind the rights of a small segment of Californians for no good reason.

Excellent job.

Meanwhile your state’s debt is ballooning out of control and your RINO Governor Schwarzenegger is busy doing albums with Tim Lambesis.  Well, not really, but he certainly isn’t putting an end to reckless spending and out of control taxation.  At least Austrian Death Machine is listenable, while watching Aah-nold himself stumble through an excuse-laden speech is not. 

This ballot process was repeated this year in Maine, where the state legislature passed a same-sex marriage law and Governor Baldacci signed it into law, but again, outside interests moved in, set up, and abused the “people’s veto” power that exists in Maine to further their own ends. I grew up in New England.  People in Maine tend to keep to themselves and don’t want to bother anyone, but they do get scared, and when the National Organization for Marriage rolls in and starts telling Mainers that “teh gheys” are coming for their kids, it’s no surprise that enough people fell for it to wipe out the law.  It wasn’t a huge margin, but all it takes is 51%.  Arkansas also outlawed adoption and child fostering by gays & lesbians in 2008 via ballot initiative in a roundabout way- only people with a state-issued marriage license can adopt, isn’t it convenient that same-sex couples cannot obtain them in Arkansas?  As a result, 29 families are entangled in a lawsuit because a majority of voters in that state decided that their religious beliefs were more important than the rights of those of the families in question.

It’s time we began to question just how these initiatives can be used.  Ballot initiatives were never intended to be used against the rights of fellow citizens, and yet this process has been used time and again, especially regarding the issue of same-sex marriage or other issues invlving LGBT rights.

In 1978, the Briggs Initiative was placed on the ballot.  This measure would have mandated that the state fire all gay and lesbian public school teachers and was vague enough to possibly include any teacher who supported LGBT rights.  Beauty queen, singer,  and orange juice pitchwoman Anita Bryant’s campaign of removing civil rights protections for gays & lesbians spurred on this effort.  It’s a good thing Carrie Prejean is such damaged goods, because history could have been repeated.  Fortunately, the Briggs initiative failed by a 58% majority, but the question still remains- why is this process allowed to be used as a weapon against other citizens?  It’s been 30 years and we’re still having to go to a ballot box to try and defend our rights, and our track record isn’t good because the majority, though shrinking, is still a majority.

Don’t these people have anything better to do than go around putting individual rights on the chopping block, and making sure that they demonize and lie in order to scare people into voting the way they want?  I don’t give a damn if you don’t like gay & lesbian couples or homosexuality as a whole, but they’re not depriving anyone else of life, liberty, or property by force or fraud, and their marriages don’t affect anyone else’s.  These initiatives, however, do constitute an act of aggression against same-sex couples and gay & lesbian individuals, who must subsidize the state-sponsored institution of marriage while being disallowed to avail themselves of it.  Some would say that the libertarian answer is to get the government out of marriage licensing, but given how entrenched it is now, that’s an unrealistic goal, and one that could be seen by these “pro-family” types as an attack against them.  This will only serve to galvanize social conservatives and theocrats.  For now, the answer is to challenge this ‘will of the people’ garbage and let it be known that individual rights are not up for a vote.  If it’s the right to choose who you enter into a contract with today, will it be the right of which church you attend tomorrow, or what you may not own in order to defend yourself, like some cities whose mob rule has outlawed handguns?

Tyranny by a majority is just as despicable as tyranny by a single person.  We are a nation founded not on mob rule, but on respect for individual liberty.  When we take the rights of our citizens and hold them up to a vote, we cheapen the principles this country was founded upon.  After all, the government is supposed to protect individual rights, not take them away at the behest of angry mobs without a compelling interest.  If we allow these ballot initiatives to stand, then we have established a precedent that rights are only as permanent as the majority allows them to be, and that thought does not make me comfortable at all.

~Matt Frost

You fought the law, and you won

Wednesday, December 30th, 2009

Three websites we love:

First up is FIJA – Fully Informed Jury Association. They teach the little-known right of juries in America to judge not just a person’s guilt of a law, but the correctness of that law itself. This right is even tacitly written into the Wyoming State Constitution, but can be tried elsewhere. NOTE: IANAL = I AM NOT A LAWYER, AND THIS IS OPINION ONLY. Read the sites, and consult an attorney. Your mileage may vary.

The second kick-ass site of the day is Judicial Watch

A non-partisan site devoted to true transparency, and accountability in our elected “leaders.” Check out their recent list of the ten most corrupt politicians in America. It includes one Republican, the rest are liberals. The list includes Obama, Eric Holder and Senator Christopher Dodd, with extensive descriptions of their transgressions.

And lastly, The JPFO – The JEWS FOR THE PRESERVATION OF FIREARMS OWNERSHIP.

You don’t have to be Jewish to join, I’m a card-carrying member and I’m as goyim as they come.

The JPFO is so uncompromising in all their stances that they almost make other gun-rights groups look like leftist gun grabboids.

The JPFO’s basis premise is “If German Jews in WWII had not voluntarily registered their guns, and had not handed them over when told to, Hitler would be but a footnote in history.”

The JPFO was founded by former firearms dealer Aaron Zelman in 1986. The JPFO interprets the Second Amendment as recognizing a pre-existing natural right of individuals to keep and bear arms. They have documented numerous links between gun control and government sponsored genocide.

Enjoy, and happy surfing!

–Michael W. Dean

“Nudged” into compliance

Tuesday, December 29th, 2009

A question for the cigarette smokers:

So, have you noticed in the last nine months or so that the cellophane on the ciggie packs is wrapped much tighter than usual? And the little part you’re supposed to pull to open them is often sealed shut?

I’ve noticed this, on both my brand and other people’s brands, both in California and in Wyoming. I usually end up cutting the wrapping off with a knife.

I’m wondering if this is subtle Obama-administration social engineering to try to get people to quit?

That may sound tin-foil hat, but consider the fact that Barry “no new taxes” Obama has a “Regulatory Czar” Cass Sunstein, who was behind raising the tax on smokes by a dollar a pack. This was ostensibly to pay for all the glorious new things the Democrats have “given” us, but also to “nudge” people toward Obama’s glorious vision of a smoke-free fat-free gun-free hippie zombie American public.

Cass Sunstein wrote a book called Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness.

The book is basically about the left’s plan to “nudge” us into health. Sunstein is also very anti-gun, anti-meat, wants to outlaw hunting, and wants to give animals human “legal rights” so they can sue us. Among a bunch of other similar things.

Cass Sunstein says of the word “Nudge” in the book’s title:

By a nudge we mean anything that influences our choices. A school cafeteria might try to nudge kids toward good diets by putting the healthiest foods at front. We think that it’s time for institutions, including government, to become much more user-friendly by enlisting the science of choice to make life easier for people and by gentling nudging them in directions that will make their lives better.

I know smoking is bad, but don’t want some academic bureaucrat in Washington deciding what I can do in my home in Wyoming. He calls it a “nudge”, I call it “1984-esque social engineering” …. by people who gently tyrannize the majority because they “know what’s best for us.”

Cass Sunstein has a really big head, so he MUST be smarter than us.

And I know how leftie these bastards work. They get an inch, then they go for a mile.

Also, Sunstein is Jewish, so he must certainly be aware of the Yiddish slang “nudge” (click here for audio of correct pronunciation).

I think that’s what he was really going for in his book title, and in all his work for Obama:

Quote:
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/nudge–verb (used with object) 1. to annoy with persistent complaints, criticisms, or pleas; nag: He was always nudging his son to move to a better neighborhood.
–verb (used without object) 2. to nag, whine, or carp.
–noun 3. a person who nudges; pest.

“Nudge” is from the same root as the Yiddish word nudnick:

An obtuse, boring, or bothersome person; a pest.

MWD

Nullification of Health Care “Reform”

Tuesday, December 29th, 2009

Health Care Nullification

By Justin West

When the monster of Health Care Reform was beginning to take form, we stood up and said we were not interested.
Our elected representatives did not listen.
As this monster was being debated, we gathered en masse to demand that it not be passed.
As votes were being tallied in the halls of Congress, we began to beg our elected officials, to no avail.
At this point it is safe to say that those elected to represent us are failing at their job. This is not representation, this is being told by those in power that they know what is better for us, even if we cannot know ourselves.
We have argued that our Constitution does not grant our federal government the authority to enact this legislation. Since we now know that it will be passed against the will of the people, and without Constitutional authority, we must make a bigger stand, We The People must stand with our officials in our state houses across the country. We must begin work to NULLIFY this over-reaching, unconstitutional legislation.

Nullification is essentially a State declaring that a piece of federal legislation oversteps Constitutional bounds and will not be recognized as law within the borders of that state. The process of Nullification dates back to the earliest days of our republic. Kentucky and Virginia moved to nullify the ‘Alien and Sedition Acts’ in 1798 and 1799. We have worked diligently to halt a government takeover of our health care, and our government has disregarded our demands. Certainly there will be a lot of new faces in Congress after the 2010 mid-term elections, but that is too late to stop what is being done now. It is time for us to stand up in our respective states and NULLIFY this legislation. The power is ours. The intent of our Founders is cleared defined in the Tenth Amendment.

Several states are already working to this end. It is time for all to stand up and join in this fight.

-Justin West

Zero-Aggression Principle, 2.0

Tuesday, December 29th, 2009

ZAP 2.0

ZAP 1.0: Do not initiate aggression.

ZAP 2.0: Do not initiate, or accept, aggression.

The ZAP (Zero-Aggression Principle, also known as “NAP” or “Non-Aggression Principle”) is a concept embraced by many libertarians. It basically boils down to “Do not initiate aggression.” (It is sometimes also stated as “Do not initiate force” or “No initiations of force!”)

I propose a small amendment to the wording of the ZAP, adding the phrase “or accept”, which would make it read: Do not initiate, or accept, aggression.

Because another tenet of libertarianism is that the right to self-defense is innate. This is one reason that libertarians are usually pro-gun, and hate the mewling-yet-aggressive demands of gun-grabboid leftists who think we should be de-clawed. This demand for the right of self-defense is embraced by both small-l libertarians and by The Libertarian Party.

Libertarians love to argue discuss things. This is natural. We don’t automatically accept things as they are, often think “I could do better” and don’t like being told how to view the world. That’s because we are libertarians.

“HERDING CATS”

Boston T. Party pointed out that:

“…Our lack of pack animal instincts has also had a part in keeping, ironically, the Freedom Movement from growing.”

I agree with Boston on this.

And a decent-sized part of all arguments discussions between libertarians, online or in person, is discussing the minutia of the ZAP. And it often comes down to some libertarians feeling like “the ZAP isn’t for me, because it sounds pacifist.”

I think the addition of “…or accept…” into the wording of the ZAP makes it work. And it’s pretty much been there all along, just not in the wording. It needed a tiny tweak to become:

ZAP 2.0: Do not initiate, or accept, aggression.

See? Problem solved. Pass it on. Tell two friends.

“FORCE” OR “AGGRESSION”?

In my book A User’s Manual for the Human Experience, I put forth “The Only Two Rules in Life”, which are the classic natural laws (with influence of the Richard Maybury wording), but with the addition of “or accept” in the first law. Thus, The Only Two Rules in Life are:

1. Do not initiate, or accept, force.

2. Keep your word.

I ran this addition by a few prominent libertarians. Jason Sorens liked it. Boston T. Party and MamaLiberty liked it, but suggested changing the word “force” to “aggression.”

I didn’t change the word “force” to “aggression” in the book, for two reasons. First, the book is largely about emotional self-defense, which is not always defense against aggression, but is usually defense against force.

Second, I think force and aggression are rather interchangeable in this context. Maybe “aggression” is more intense force, or “meaner” force, but I think all aggression is force (even dropping an A-Bomb is force, as well as being aggression). But maybe not all force is aggression (making a passive-aggressive remark about someone probably is force but is not always aggression. And learning to deal effectively with passive-aggressive serenity vampires, time wasters and people pleasers is what my new book is largely about).

Regardless, I think the aggression/force debate is semantics about minutia. But I (and others) do like the addition of “or accept” into the ZAP. It’s not minutia, it’s about the overall macro principle of a major tenet of libertarianism.

Use the wording with “aggression”, rather than “force”, if that seems to work better. It works, and I think it will unite libertarians more by getting rid of one of the main (and most silly) arguments that we see over and over and over. And over. And over….

(Comment on this page here.)

(See also, post about Rick Maybury’s two rules.)

Thank you,

Michael W. Dean