Archive for the ‘The road to serfdom’ Category

Is the president being impeached?

Sunday, February 28th, 2010

(re-post of a blog post I did in June 2008 about George W. Bush. I’m re-posting to quash beliefs that I only dislike liberals and love all Republicans.)

statue-of-liberty-spanking-george-bush

Is the president being impeached? (I hope so.)

I have been watching a lot of C-SPAN lately. It’s basically the only thing worth watching, now that all TV pretty much sucks.

Not a lot of people watch C-SPAN. So I’m one of the small percentage of Americans who know, at this moment, that Representative Dennis Kucinich is on the Congressional floor presenting his resolution calling for Bush’s impeachment. It’s a list of 35 charges, (list here) mostly Constitutional violations and Geneva Convention violations, and he’s been reading it for about an hour, and he’s about halfway through it. A member of the House of Representatives presenting a resolution detailing charges is one of the first steps in impeachment proceedings.

The charges range from election fraud, including disenfranchisement, to illegal wiretapping to illegal torture, to lying about our reasons for going to war, to handing out padded military contracts to his buddies. And a lot more. I can barely keep up. And I’m as giddy as a kid in a candy store about this. So is Debra Jean. She’s glued to the screen. We both love the Constitution. A lot.

It’s history in the making, and it’s not even on CNN.com or Yahoo News yet. I think it’s an emergency meeting, because it’s 10:30 PM in DC right now. I remember seeing the effort to impeach Richard Nixon as news coverage on TV when I was a kid, but he was never actually impeached. (He quit before that could happen, and Ford pardoned Nixon as soon as he took office.) And Nixon was basically just going to be charged with, as I recall, one thing (conspiring to pay people to bug a hotel room). The charges being read against Bush are many, and many are far more serious.

Kucinich is quoting the US Constitution a lot. I wish Kucinich had made it to run for president. He’s smart, and has other things going for him.

I have a prediction: tonight on the Colbert show, Colbert will report this out of character, as he really is, not as his “alter ego” who would be outraged by this. He’ll just state it, and let people cheer.

Here’s a quick 20-minute podcast I recorded, and uploaded while the proceedings were still being read live. It’s about 17 minutes of the charges being read, and about three minutes of us commenting on it. We’re pretty much in shock. And pretty happy.

(behind every great short man is a smart, better looking, and often taller, woman)

Fuck your ideology.

Saturday, February 27th, 2010


Up the independents.  I am tired of people trying to put me into a box because they only see other people’s political views in relation to their own.  If I am disagreeing with a liberal, that must mean I am a right-wing nutcase.  If I am arguing with a conservative, then I am a bedwetting liberal moonbat.  Stop already, you people who do this are embarrassing yourselves.

Recently, I had an exchange with someone on one of the message boards I post on.  Someone complained that Republicans were abusing the filibuster and stonewalling Democrat-backed legislation in the Senate.  When I mentioned that the Democrats did the same thing to President Bush’s judicial nominees, I got a world of shit for it.  I was called an ‘apologist’ for the GOP, I was told that it was different since the Dems were filibustering nominees but the Republicans are just blocking everything.  I was even called a “traitor” to who I am, since the Republicans generally oppose same-sex marriage and the repeal of the Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell policy.  Oh man, did I get pissed.  Here’s what I said:

“Who the hell do you think you are to tell me what my political ideology should be based on who I have sex with? Because I like smoking a pole or two, that means I have to support EVERY liberal tax me out the ass, welfare state-loving, illegal immigrant harboring, enviro-nazi chump-stain socialist douche nozzle who runs for office?

Again, fuck you, pal. I agree with what the Democrats SAY about marriage equality and ending DADT, now let’s see them actually DELIVER on it. Maybe then I’ll be more willing to put up with all the other bullshit that spews out of the DNC. Until then, I will support whomever the fuck I want and if you don’t like it, tough shit.”

I was slightly miffed.

The truth is that I can’t stand either major political party.  I think they’re both full of incompetent and/or corrupt people out for their own gain and their own power.  I don’t think they care one bit about average people.  TS, who responds to many posts here, believes that conservatives are selfish and liberals are compassionate.  Are they?  Or is that what people been led to believe by those who are trying to pose as compassionate?  Who or what defines compassion anyway, or selfishness for that matter?  Doesn’t anyone ever think that maybe, just maybe, there isn’t that great of a divide between Republicans and Democrats when it comes to their votes and their actions?  Put away the rhetoric and look at what they DO.

Both tend to favor big business over the individual.

Both supported bailouts and giveaways to failing industries.

Both were complicit in the signing of the Patriot Act and in sending our troops to war in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Both parties used the filibuster as a cheap way to thwart the executive branch, and both parties even met to hammer out a compromise so they would be able to use the cloture process as a de-facto filibuster in the future.

Both support the massive confiscation and wasting of our tax dollars.

Both support, for the most part, the war on drugs.

Both supported NAFTA and all of the other so-called “free trade” agreements that only served to gut the American workforce and erode our national sovereignity.

Just because they pretend to be on polar opposites every election year doesn’t mean they really are.  They’re simply trying to get themselves elected, and the American public buys it, thinking that there are real differences at play.

As George Carlin was fond of saying,  “Bull-fucking-shit!”

Words of Wisdom:

Rest in peace, George.  A shame you didn’t live to see the final freak show.

Matti F.

How people are FORCED at gunpoint give away their private assets to “help” others.

Saturday, February 27th, 2010

TS asked on a comment on another thread: “Please explain how people are being ‘forced’ to give away their private assets to help others.” (in regard to progressives/liberals/Democrats).

This really is libertarianism 101, but deserves its own post.

But here ya go:

When you vote in people who want to increase social spending (welfare, for instance, or foreign aid), those people raise taxes. If someone who did not vote for that person disagrees, he has to pay those taxes anyway. If he doesn’t pay taxes, agents of the government will come to his house and arrest him. If he refuses to come out, they will come in his house and put a gun to his head.

Therefore, the social services you “benevolently” and “compassionately” vote for are paid for with taxes collected at the barrel of a gun. This is an initiation of aggression and a use of force and is NOT compassionate.

Moreover, Democracy is undemocratic, because 51% can tyrannize 49% with things like this.

This joke explains it well:

I recently asked my friends’ little girl what she wanted to be when she grows up. She said she wanted to be President some day. Both of her parents, liberal Democrats, were standing there, so I asked her, ‘If you were President what would be the first thing you would do? ‘

She replied, ‘I’d give food and houses to all the homeless people.’

Her parents beamed with pride.

‘Wow…what a worthy goal.’ I told her, ‘But you don’t have to wait until you’re President to do that. You can come over to my house and mow the lawn, pull weeds, and sweep my yard, and I’ll pay you $50. Then I’ll take you over to the grocery store where the homeless guy hangs out, and you can give him the $50 to use toward food and a new house. ‘

She thought that over for a few seconds, then she looked me straight in the eye and asked, ‘ Why doesn’t the homeless guy come over and do the work, and you can just pay him the $50? ‘

I said, ‘Welcome to the Republican Party.’

Her parents still aren’t speaking to me.

Another quick explanation is found in one of my lyrics, the Right Arm of Wyoming song “Freaky Liberal Mammal Sex“:

If my neighbor had three cars and I stole one
I’d rightly go to prison
If this “progressive” gub’ment mugs my neighbor for his car
to tax-support crack babies
Liberals think that’s justice

–Michael W. Dean

Alaska Governor wants to make YOU pay for someone elses college.

Thursday, February 18th, 2010

http://www.adn.com/news/education/story/964075.html

Alaska Governor Sean Parnell is proposing a bill that will pay for a students schooling depending on grades (A=%100, B= %75, C=%50). I think this is bullshit. No one has the right to make you pay for another person’s college. And now while this is probably paid for by taxes from the oil companies and other corporation and not individuals, it’s still wrong. Taxation is theft, whether by a mugger in the street or a politician in DC. And what is a corporation but a group of individuals.

And the price of this?:

Parnell is proposing to pay for it by carving out $400 million of the state’s $8 billion Constitutional Budget Reserve Fund savings account as its own separate endowment, saying interest and investment profits from that would be used to pay for the scholarships. State Education Commissioner Larry LeDoux said it’s not clear how much the program would cost the state each year but he figures $20 million could be available annually for covering the costs of the scholarship program.

I would much rather struggle to pay for college and live off of ramen and live on a couch through my schooling than make others pay for my college.

-JD

California cop suggests shooting gun owners who open carry

Monday, February 15th, 2010

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,585807,00.html

East Palo Alto Police Det. Rod Tuason apparently posted the remarks on his Facebook page in response to a friend’s status update, which suggested that gun advocates who carry unloaded weapons openly — which is legal in California — should do so in places like “Oakland, Richmond and East Palo Alto” and not just in “hoity toity” cities.

“Haha we had one guy last week try to do it!” Tuason replied. “He got proned out [laid face-down on the ground] and reminded where he was at and that turds will jack him for his gun in a heartbeat!”

Several comments later, the detective suggested shooting the gun rights advocates, some of whom have carried firearms openly in recent weeks in California’s Bay Area, particularly at Starbucks locations.

“Sounds like you had someone practicing their 2nd amendment rights last night!” Tuason wrote. “Should’ve pulled the AR out and prone them all out! And if one of them makes a furtive movement … 2 weeks off!!!” — referring to the modified duty, commonly known as desk duty, that typically follows any instance in which an officer is investigated for firing his weapon…..

Man. I am SO glad in EVERY way that we moved out of that state. I really feel like it’s almost a different country.

MWD

Here’s a screengrab of the exahange, before they deleted it to destroy evidence:

the world is doomed

Wednesday, February 10th, 2010

Really, if all writing was distilled to its essence, books would be about five pages long, and most internet forums would be blank.
I could say this with a lot more words, but I’ll boil it down “America is doomed.” And America is the last best part of the world, so the world is doomed.

Really, the right may have a “comeback” in the next few years, but within two or three presidential election cycles, there will be enough new kids turning 18, who were educated in public schools, that there will probably be a leftist majority running this country forever.

There will be enough resistance for the next 40 years to have some semblance of “America” into my old age, but the 20 years after that, and beyond, will be hell. The 20 years after I die of old age and people just getting old enough to vote now, that will be the point it really hits the fan.

I predict in 60 years America will look like Haiti. Or Blade Runner. Or Idiocracy. Or Communist Russia. Or Demolition Man. Most likely, some mix of all five.

Here’s what I predict:
– hyperinflation
– to take Tom Waits out of context “everything’s broken and no one speaks English”
– no free speech, “hate speech” a felony
– very high taxes
– All phones and e-mail tapped all the time.
– most everyone works for the government, the rest are on welfare
– total Affirmative Action. Straight, white, Christians will be treated like blacks were in America just post-slavery.
– rewriting of Constitution
–re-writing of history, scrubbing of Constitution, Founding Fathers
– no private ownership of weapons (y’all think I overstate guns, but when the guns are gone, the tyrants can do anything to you. Citizens just having them, not even using them, makes a difference)

So when you say I’m silly for making the modest proposal that we should eliminate voting for people who will only vote in more nanny-tyranny, I really believe that the above is your alternative.

MWD

Charlie Wilson’s war is over

Wednesday, February 10th, 2010

Charlie Wilson’s died. He was the 70s Texas Democrat Congressman/playboy/coke addict who basically armed the Taliban.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100210/ap_on_re_us/us_obit_wilson

They made a “heroic” movie about him called “Charlie Wilson’s War” where he’s played by Tom Hanks.

Charlie Wilson in AfghanistanCharlie Wilson on a white horse while in Afghanistan. Photograph: AP (actual photo, not from the movie.)

Charles Wilson

More on Charlie:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Wilson_%28Texas_politician%29

The girls had cocaine, and the music was loud. It was total happiness. And both of them had ten long, red fingernails with an endless supply of beautiful white powder….The feds spent a million bucks trying to figure out whether, when those fingernails passed under my nose, did I inhale or exhale, and I ain’t telling.

Charile Wilson

In 1980, Wilson was accused of using cocaine at the Caesars Palace in Las Vegas; however, the investigation by Justice Department attorney Rudolph Giuliani was dropped due to lack of evidence.

Wilson was presented with the Honored Colleague Award by the CIA. He is the first civilian to receive the award. However, Wilson’s role remains controversial because most of the aid was supplied to Islamist hardliner Gulbuddin Hekmatyar, now a senior Taliban leader and a supporter of al-Qaeda.

MWD

Why not split up the country?

Tuesday, February 9th, 2010

Someone on ConPunk asked “Why not just split it into the red states and the blue states? I think at this point, both sides would be happy with that.”

I replied:

The left would never go for it. They need the red states to steal from, since we’re all in better shape financially. We don’t bail out bums as much, and we have more natural resources. Places like Wyoming, Texas, West Virginia and the Dakotas have all the oil and coal, natural gas and uranium. (And much of the wind and sun.)

People in New York and California think they should be administering that stuff from a comfy office, not out drilling for it.

Also, the leftie blue states would be driven mad by the thought that there are people in the next state raising their kids the way they want, carrying guns, going to church and not supporting crack babies. It would drive the lefties even more nuts than they are now.

MWD

Another crotchety old Democrat dies today….

Monday, February 8th, 2010
Rep. John Murtha (D-Pa.) dies today – they’re already predicting a tough battle for his seat in the House of Representatives…
They’re dropping like flies on poison garbage, they are.
And I like it.
To anyone who says “That’s horrible! Don’t disrespect the dead!” I say “Fuck it, and fuck you. Those nanny statist bastards are stealing from us, robbing us at gunpoint and fucking up America to try to make it socialist.” I say “Good riddance to bad trash.”
He was revered among Democrats — and even some Republicans — for his skill over 19 terms in using the power of the federal purse to make kings and deals. A right-hand man of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, he was considered one of the most influential lawmakers on Capitol Hill and credited with her ascension.
and
A hint of scandal lingered over much of Murtha’s career. The FBI named Murtha an “unindicted co-conspirator” in its ABSCAM sting operation in the late 1970s and early ‘80s. ABSCAM resulted in the conviction of five House members and one senator. The FBI recorded Murtha on videotape declining a $50,000 bribe from federal agents posing as Arab sheiks. But the Congressman did say he could be interested in future dealings.
This death couldn’t come at a worse time for the King George Obama-led administration. But you know what they say, “Coincidences are God’s way of staying anonymous.”
-Michael W. Dean

The Most Pressing Issue Faced Today

Saturday, January 30th, 2010

With the economy still in peril, troops still on the ground in two theaters, and rogue nations developing nuclear weapons, we would think that our federal government would have a lot to occupy their time. Apparently, nothing can be more important than getting involved in matters that should never be discussed by the Legislative or the Executive. The most pressing issue of the day is the Bowl Championship Series (BCS) for college football.

Of course we all hate the BCS. A playoff series would be more fair, and exponentially easier to understand. We shouldn’t have to have a degree in Statistics to understand the ranking system, but is this how senior members of the Senate and the Obama administration need to be spending their time? Senator Orrin Hatch (R-UT) has requested a review by the Justice Department concerning the matter. Apparently he agrees with President Obama that the BCS ranking system is just too much to bear. Obama stated before his inauguration that he disagreed with the system in place for determining a National Champion football team. I believe the direct quote was “Throw my weight around” to nudge the BCS into a playoff system. Now we have the Justice Department reviewing whether an Anti-Trust investigation is needed. Now I suppose we must sit back and wait for the Justice Department to find a law that would invade into college football. Statist intervention at its finest.

On a positive note, when the issue is big enough, Republicans and Democrats can work together in a beautiful demonstration of bi-partisanship to accomplish far reaching goals. Economy, health care reform, and war are just trivial issues that should be politicized, but college football…

-Justin West

Gun violence is the lefties’ fault

Tuesday, January 26th, 2010

Gun violence is the fault of the progressives.

I don’t really have much of a problem with the Democratic Party. I have a problem with the so-called progressives, the far-Left, which usually lives these days in the Democratic Party (Pelosi, Obama, Reid, Frank, Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton, and Ted Kennedy, whom I want to congratulate on getting five months sober this week!) But there are progressives on the Right too. John McCain is one. Rudy Giuliani is another.

The only legitimate, Constitutional, moral role of government is to protect the borders and protect the Constitutional rights of the citizens. This is right-wing/libertarian ideology in a nutshell.

By definition, progressives are people who think that government should grow and should attempt to “solve” everyone’s problems (often the problems created by the government). Progressives are busybodies. They think they’re smarter than you. They tend to say “THERE OUGHTA BE A LAW!” and “THINK OF THE CHILDREN!” a lot. To which I say “You think of your children, I’ll think of mine.”

A good example of progressive thought in action is the financial crisis: progressives (like Obama, but also George W. Bush in his “lame duck” period) caused a problem. Then they try to solve the same problem, using the people who caused it (Ben Bernanke). Then they do exactly what should NOT be done (printing more money, going into debt).

Any eighth grader who’s good at math can tell you that’s the wrong way. The right way is to get out of the way, remove regulations, and let the economy flourish.

Here’s a good video explaining this. It’s sort of “School House Rock” for the new generation:

It is not the role of government to “create jobs.” At best, the role of government is to create an environment (low taxes, no nanny laws) where jobs are created by a free market.

There are tens of thousands of gun laws in America, at the federal, state and local level. Yet not one of them has ever prevented a crime. They only serve to make politicians look like they’re doing their job, and make law-abiding citizens into criminals.

Progressives want to outlaw guns to solve the problem of gun violence, a problem the progressives created!

Right-wing states like Utah and Wyoming have a very low incidence of gun violence. And guns are common, and treated with respect. People are also treated with respect. (The ironic thing is that less “redneck” places look at places like Utah and Wyoming as “primitive.” They laugh at us. They are wrong. We’re far more socialized and decent places to live. I know. I’ve lived in Los Angeles, and I’ve had a knife held to my throat in a mugging in New York City.)

Left-wing progressive places like New York City, Los Angeles, Chicago and Washington, D.C. have high rates of gun violence. Sure, part of this has to do with population, but a lot of it has to do with culture.

I’m not a Christian, but I believe that Christian upbringing ain’t a bad thing. Back when that was the norm, gun crime was much lower. Even the “Wild West”, often considered the go-to example of gun violence, didn’t have that much gun violence. That impression is the work of Hollywood. Which is filled with progressives. When is the last time you saw a person in a movie use a gun in a moral way, in pure self-defense? Almost never. Yet movies are filled with people using guns, almost always in an immoral way. Using a gun in a movie is “shorthand” for excitement. The prevalence of guns in movies is the result of lazy screenwriters, and gun-hating producers.

Right-wing places teach children to work for their goals. Left-wing places teach children that they are “entitled”, that they only have to “dream it, and they’ll get it.”….”I gots to get mine“….. Which place do you think produces more bitter, disappointed people willing to shoot up a crowd of innocents?

Progressives also downplay the role of family. Conservatives tend to have stronger families, and teach that “family is all”. Progressives teach that the family unit is an impediment, that you should “spread your wings and find your own way.”

Which group do you think has a better foundation for dealing with problems?

Progressives are revisionist with history. They downplay the role of guns in the founding of America, especially in the American Revolution. The whitewash the role of hard work in the foundation and strengthening of America. They consider wealth a bad thing, something that only exists to be stolen and redistributed to those who “deserve it” just for existing. This creates an angry underclass of people who not only think the world owes them a living, but reinforces it with a bi-monthly check.

Progressives support revolving-door prison systems, and are usually against the death penalty. Both of these put more violent people back on the street and don’t discourage violent behavior. Progressives generally consider violent felons to be a “victims of a bad upbringing” rather than simply broken machines. A good example is the ACLU, which has reams of writings on the rights of violent criminals in custody, but not one word on self-defense.

Progressives teach that any culture except American culture (including guns) is to be protected. Progressives teach that American culture is embarrassing, something to apologize for.

The progressive media also only ever reports immoral uses of guns. When was the last time you saw a news story about a little old lady using her gun to keep from being killed by some armed scumbag wanting to kill her to take her Social Security check for a fix? Yet it happens all the time.

Progressives teach their children not to have a Christian morality. They also teach their kids that “life is cheap” by telling them that abortion is a valid option if they “inconvenience” themselves with a pregnancy (due to their “fuck everything that moves” progressive morality).

I’m not making a case for anti-abortion or pro-Christianity or anti-”free love”, but I believe that “progressive” views on abortion, sex, family and religion, combined with Hollywood, have contributed heavily to gun violence seeming like a “solution” to many people. I am saying that the anti-Christian pro-abortion anti-family “I gots to get mine” agenda of progressives, and guns in Hollywood movies, are all the fault of the progressives, and contribute heavily to the prevalence of gun violence.

My brother was an Eagle Scout and participated in an after-school riflemanship program at his public school. When he was a high school senior in 1963 (back when America had a Christian morality), he used to bring his .22 rifle and ammo on the school bus and keep it in his locker for the after-school shooting classes. No one got shot, and no one cared. Whereas if you brought a boy scout pocket knife to school now, you’d be kicked out of school and likely arrested.

Obama’s DHS warns to look out for pro-American right-wing gun nuts. But almost all of the recent mass gun violence was done by people who were anti-American and left wing. The Ft. Hood shooter was anti-American. Even the shooter at the Holocaust Museum was a registered Democrat who hated Fox News.

Never forget, the KKK were Democrats! And the guy who freed the slaves was a Republican. And while we’re at it, Wyoming was the first place to give women the vote. Though that may have just been so some of them would move here!

Gun violence is the fault of the progressives. And it’s immoral that so-called progressives try to take away my guns just because they’ve wrecked so much of the world with their policies. Gun violence in secular New York City and Los Angeles has nothing to do with me in Christian Wyoming. So back the fuck off.

–Michael W. Dean

Gun control is immoral

Monday, January 25th, 2010

So, someone asked me today about “sensible” gun control. I maintain that no such thing exists.

First…

Most people who want to regulate guns don’t know much about them.

This comment on another post on this blog is typical:

I do believe that we do have the right to protect ourselves with a firearm like a shotgun or a rifle. The thing that I’m not convinced on is the need to own assault weapons like an AK-47 or an Uzi.

Here’s the thing: an AK-47 IS a rifle. And a pretty anemic one at that. Any .30 cal deer rifle has MUCH more destructive power. And range. And with a  scope, it’s pretty much a sniper rifle that could kill a man at a quarter mile. (And most deer rifles are .30 cal, it’s pretty cruel to hunt deer with anything smaller, you need to kill deer in one shot, or they suffer.) An AK-47 cannot kill effectively at a quarter mile.

Not that any of that is reassuring to anyone who likes gun control, but you will NEVER get guns out of the hands of the millions of deer hunters in America. Never.

Though the “sporting purpose” mentioned by many gun grabbers (as in “we want to ban anything that does not have a sporting purpose”) has nothing to do with the Second Amendment. The “sporting purpose” crap came from an American adaptation of a Nazi Germany gun control law.

Gun control is immoral because all honest, free men have an innate right to self-defense, on a one-to-one level, like a violent mugger, but also on a larger, “opposing tyranny” level.

The Second Amendment has nothing to do with shooting deer. The right to shoot deer was a given in the rural community of early America. If you couldn’t shoot deer, you’d starve.

The Second Amendment has to do with being able to make sure that the government doesn’t get too large. To protect yourself from government. Though even uttering these words today gets you put on a watch list. Fedzilla has grown to the point that it wants to remove the Second Amendment. And they do it slowly, in bits and pieces. Give ‘em an inch and they take a mile.

Because of the Second Amendment, politicians cannot outright ban guns. So they go after them incrementally, and each bit of gun control (or ammo control, lately) legislation is a step toward the unstated goal of the government having all the guns and the people having none. Once that happens, they can cram anything down your throat, and there is nothing you can do about it.

America was founded by guys who were really pissed.
But if you quote the Founding Fathers now, you’re called a terrorist!

–”Liberty in Shards” by Right Arm of Wyoming

Most politicians who want to outlaw guns don’t do so for love of the public safety. They only do it for power: the power of having the government have the only guns, and the power of getting votes. Politicians love votes, and promising to be “tough on guns” (instead of being tough on actual crime, which is harder) usually gets a few votes with the “think of the children!” parrots.

Back to the original reason for the Second Amendment: you don’t have to use your guns to prevent encroaching tyranny, you only have to have them. And maybe be willing to use them if things get bad enough. And have the skill to do so.

By the way, you need rifles to oppose tyranny. No revolutions were ever won with pistols, and tyranny is not opposed with a shotgun.

“Progressive” leftists tend to be into banning guns, because leftists think that they know what’s best for everyone. People on the right have more trust in people. They don’t need to “nanny” everyone.

But most leftist gun grabbers have never held a gun, so why should they be in charge of regulating them? Here’s a typical gun grabbing leftist, trying to explain the random indicators that defined an “assault weapon” under the “assault weapon ban” that she helped create.

Would you trust someone who is that stupid about pharmaceuticals to regulate medicine? (Never mind, that’s what the Democrats are trying to do with health care.)

Note that she also uses the incorrect term “clip” (should be “mag” or “magazine”) Also, “assault weapon” is a made-up, meaningless term. As is the specious indicators that “defined” one under that law. A pistol grip on a rifle never killed anyone, nor does it help anyone kill anyone. There is something called an “assault rifle” (a full-auto, select fire AK-47 would qualify, so do the guns our boys carry in Iraq, but both of those are already illegal for private citizens in America), but gun grabboids’ definition of “assault weapon” often includes many shotguns and hand guns too. Basically, it banned anything that looked like a military weapon, was black, and looked scary. They banned some very underpowered guns, and didn’t ban some very powerful guns, based entirely on cosmetics. Some gun lovers even called the “assault weapons ban” the “scary looking ugly black gun ban.”

Obama’s boy Eric Holder tried to reinstate the “Assault Weapon” ban last year, and said it was to help Mexico in their War on Drugs! Trying to limit our Constitutional rights to help a foreign country is treasonous, in my opinion.

All gun control has historically led to total gun confiscation, which has always led to tyrants being able to kill dissenters. Hitler, Pol Pot and Stalin all took away the guns before doing the horrible things they’re best known for.

Gun control and gun registration does not prevent crime. There are thousands of gun laws on the books, and not one of them has made anyone safer. They have only made criminals out of law-abiding citizens. Gun control simply disarms citizens. If your daughter were being stalked, would you want her to have to wait ten days to get a gun, when the criminal stalking her likely already has a gun? And while we’re on the subject of waiting periods: if you think they’re a good idea, keep people from buying a gun when they’re enraged, why should there be a waiting periods on your second gun? And your third, fourth, fifth, etc. ?

A lot of places are going after ammo, since they think that’s more Constitutional than going after guns. But limiting the amount of ammo people can get, and requiring paperwork on ammo, will have some dark unintended consequences: criminals breaking into honest follks’ homes to get ammo, and honest folks not being able to practice much. I think people who shoot should practice often, and with a lot of rounds. If someone is having to use a gun in a self-defense situation, the more practice they’ve had, the less likely they are to hit an innocent bystander.

And when asked why I should be able to have a military-pattern semi-auto gun, I say why not? I’m an honest person. Should you be limited to a slow computer with little memory because hackers can work faster on fast computers? I have a military-pattern rifle because who the fuck knows what’s going to come to my door or my neighborhood? If there were an earthquake and people were looting and trying to kill me, en mass, a shotgun and a handgun (which I also have) wouldn’t save me.

Why should my handgun be limited to a ten-round mag? If a criminal (who, by definition, does not respect the law and does not follow it) tries to mug me, starts shooting, why should I have to stop to reload? That could get me killed. (And anyone who says “If ten rounds isn’t enough, you’re not a good shoot” knows nothing about guns or self-defense. Especially when trying to fend off more than one bad guy, and they’re not standing still.)

A common chirp of gun grabboids is “The Founding Fathers didn’t imagine Uzis and AK-47s when they wrote the Second Amendment.” Well, I can guarantee if they did, they would have included that. They had the cutting edge of battle technology at the time.

A good response I’ve heard to “The Founding Fathers didn’t imagine Uzis and AK-47s when they wrote the Second Amendment” is a response about the First Amendment: “I’m willing to only carry a brace of muskets if the New York Times is willing to only publish on hand-run presses and only deliver papers by horseback.”

A lot of people confuse Uzis and AK-47s with machine guns, because both are also available in full-auto (machine gun). Only criminals have those in America. I know people with AK-47s, but they’re legal semi-auto versions.

By the way, I have several semi-auto rifles that are FAR more powerful than an AK-47.

Which brings me to the “Why do you need so many guns?” question. Well, why do you need so many shoes? I have different guns for different things. Plus, I just like guns. I like the history of them (which is why I own a 1943 gun that was actually used to kill actual Nazis), I like the feel of them, the mechanics and the science of them. Why does a stamp collector have so many damn stamps?

My guns in Wyoming don’t effect you in your state. My guns don’t even affect you if you’re my next-door neighbor. Like most gun owners, I’m an honest person. Assault and murder are illegal, and rightfully so. I will not do those things, I wouldn’t do them even if they were legal. So lay off my guns.

Guns hurt far less people than cars and swimming pools. And you don’t need a gun to hurt people. You can kill someone with a rock or a hammer. So keep your immoral desire to control my guns to yourself, and go after actual criminals instead of trying to make me into a criminal.

–Michael W. Dean

I hate children.

Monday, January 25th, 2010

Look upon this face.  This is the face that will steal your liberty every single time.  Do you know why?  I’ll tell you.

Your freedom is harmful to children, therefore it must be curtailed.  The ideal nanny state would reduce us all to this crying child, helpless to do anything without government help or better yet, permission.

About a year and a half ago, Colorado passed a law barring discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity in such areas as employment, housing, credit, public accommodations, and so on.  While I am opposed to anti-discrimination laws on principle and believe them to be relics, the response from the social conservatives on the right was to try and scare people by saying that their children would be preyed upon by cross-dressers in public bathrooms.  Listen to this ad by Focus on the Family.  Try not to laugh, because although it is comical and absurd, a lot of people fall for shit like this.

Here’s another spot by the lovely kooks at the National Organization for Marriage, the lovely bunch who brought you the hysterical “Gathering Storm” ads.

Notice how they use children to make parents afraid, scared that they will learn that gay people exist, that they’re even your neighbors and relatives, with the underlying, unstated threat being that acceptance of same-sex marriage will make your kids gay.

Lest you think I am a one-trick pony with this gay issue, look to other nanny-state laws that were put into effect initially to protect children, but were soon extended to all of us.  Seat belt laws are a prime example.  Used to be that if someone under 12 was in a car they had to be buckled in, but now we all have to wear them regardless.  It doesn’t matter that seat belts can kill by trapping someone in a burning car, strangling a motorist or passenger in a wreck, or holding them firmly to a seat that careens into a tree whereas an impact without a seat belt may have knocked them aside, the government is going to force you for your alleged own good to wear a seat belt, and it all started with the grand, noble idea of protecting the children.

Video games are a favorite target of censors who claim that they make children violent, or turn them into lethargic slugs who shun fresh air and grow obese.  Yes, it’s the video game, not the lack of parenting, that makes a child stay indoors on beautiful days.  It’s Grand Theft Auto that makes a kid steal a car or shoot someone.  Has to be, because the parents in these cases are all in utter denial that their special little zygote would do something so terrible.  It’s the same kind of denial that allowed Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold to stockpile guns and grenades and pipe bombs and pull off the Columbine Massacre.  Not my kids, not my fault, must be Marilyn Manson’s fault.

The most damaging instance, however, came following the halftime performance at the 2004 Super Bowl, when Justin Timberlake grabbed Janet Jackson’s blouse and tugged, exposing for a mere half a second, one saggy, flappy brown breast that had a gold star over the nipple.  You would have thought that she was masturbating with a crucifix in front of Catholic school kindergartners by the outrage, but in reality it was so fast that few people even saw it.  Cameras cut away and Janet quickly covered up her, ah, “wardrobe malfunction”.  If I remember correctly, this was tame compared to some of the other performances where raunchy bump and grinds were being performed by Nelly and the suggestive lyrics coming from him and Sean Combs (I have no idea what the fuck he calls himself these days).  In the aftermath of this event, the FCC increased their fines for indecency tenfold and began going after broadcasters in television and radio for things that wouldn’t have merited a second listen or look.  Howard Stern was chased off of terrestrial radio, and many morning “shock jocks” either lost their gigs or were forced to water down their shows to the point where they weren’t funny or engaging anymore.  The panic also had a chill factor on what networks and stations were willing to allow, and many programming decisions were now put in the hands of worrywart lawyers and middle management whose job was to insulate the company from fines and possible lawsuits.  The television networks are dying dinosaurs, giant carcasses being strangled by regulation, while cable thrives.  Terrestrial radio is a dead medium for all but political talk on the AM waves, satellite radio is ascendant.  The internet is blowing them all away, it’s truly the last frontier of free speech.

If you think the government and the FCC don’t want to stick their noses into cable, satellite, and internet, think again.  Bet you dollars to donuts the rationale they will use is “protecting the children”, because apparently, being a parent is hard and we need our government to help us out.

Think long and hard before you offer up everyone’s liberty as a sacrifice to protect your children.  Those of us who are over 30 grew up with very little of these restrictions and protections and we’re just fine.  You’re simply being groomed to accept more and more government intrusion into your everyday life, and they’re getting at you by preying on the fear that parents naturally have for their offspring.  Don’t fall for it, whether it comes from a liberal or a conservative, the government does not have your best interests at heart.  The leviathan is only after power and can never have enough.

~Matti Frost

All-white basketball league

Sunday, January 24th, 2010

All-American Basketball Alliance

A new professional basketball league boasting rosters made up exclusively of white Americans has its eyes set on Augusta, but the team isn’t receiving a warm welcome.

I see no reason why they should not be able to do this, in a world where all other races have their own “our race only” coalitions and organizations. Can you imagine if someone started the “United Caucasian College Fund” or the “National Association for the Advancement of White People.”? They’d be crucified. Which is ironic, because while the United Negro College Fund” and the NAACP were started to foster a “leg up for people who are downtrodden”, at this point, they’ve accomplished their goals and then some.

For instance, it’s now far easier for a black or Asian student to get into a good university than it is for a white student with the same academic record and economic status.

However, back to the “White men CAN jump” B-ball league, they had to know going in that they’d get a shit storm, which is actually probably why they did it…to make a point.

Although I’m sure it’s guys who enjoy playing ball, and maybe don’t like playing with non-white players. In a libertarian paradise, there would be nothing wrong with this, nor would there be any reason to not have a black-only or Hispanic-only group. The only difference is, in the libertarian paradise, no group would get SPECIAL protections, just equal protections.

If you think anyone is welcome anywhere in today’s world, try being male and having a drink in a hardcore lesbian bar. I’ve tried that when I lived in San Francisco. It wasn’t pretty. Also try being white and having a drink in a bar in a black neighborhood. I’ve done that too. Wasn’t thrown out like in the lesbian bar, just ignored while simultaneously being “studied” like an strange insect.

I think racism is one of the most ridiculous aspects of humanity. But I also think there’s a lot of governmentally and socially protected “reverse racism” (i.e. actual racism, but against white people) in the world now, and I don’t mind calling it what it is.

MWD

Stupid stupid stupid liberals

Sunday, January 24th, 2010

Stupid stupid stupid liberals.

From CNN:

My 68-year-old mother-in-law refuses to take a bath but once a week. Is this healthy or even legally acceptable? Please help.
Is it LEGALLY ACCEPTABLE? Holy fucking hell….liberals want to regulate EVERYTHING. Can you imagine this call?: “Hello…911? My mother-in-law doesn’t bathe as often as I’d like. Please come arrest her.”
Fuck. Fuck these people. They should never have any power, and should probably all be sent at gunpoint to libertarian re-education camps immediately. (Just kidding.)
Reminds me of this:

and this

MLK owned guns

Monday, January 18th, 2010

Remember all this when any gun grabber (including Obama, who sometimes seems to think he’s MLK Jr. Jr.) demands you give up your guns.

http://www.lesjones.com/posts/004857.shtml

Well before his decision (apparently in 1955) to embrace Ghandian non-violence as the best tactic in the national showdown over civil rights, King had been a committed civil rights activist, but also a man who believed in protecting himself and his family against constant threats of racist violence (which included the bombing of his home).

Accordingly, the pre-Ghandian King had been armed to protect himself and his family — to the point where his home was described by one activist as “an arsenal“:

King would later admit that at the start of the boycott be was not firmly committed to Gandhian principles. He had initially advocated nonviolence not as a way of life but as a practical necessity for a racial minority. When his home was bombed at the end of January, he had cited Jesus– “He who lives by the sword will perish by the sword”– rather than Gandhi in urging angry black neighbors to remain nonviolent. At the time of the bombing, King was seeking a gun permit, and he was protected by armed bodyguards. Only after the bombing did King alter his views on the use of weapons for protection. His reconsideration was encouraged by the arrival in Montgomery of two pacifists who were far more aware than he of Gandhian principles.

Also see The Racist Origins Of Gun Control

HOPE? and CHANGE?

Saturday, January 16th, 2010

Great video put together from my friend Chris from the JPFO.

Death threats to me on YouTube

Saturday, January 16th, 2010

Got a nice one today:

suboptimal wrote

This is probably the stupidest video I’ve seen on youtube. You’re a moran!

I replied “The stupidest? THAT would be quite an honor!”

suboptimal wrote

OMFG I know you’re not being sarcastic to me. I don’t know who you think you are or where you’re from but around here we don’t tolerate bullshit like that. If this were on the streets where I’m from, you’d get a cap in your ass, son!

I used to be a nigga on the street tryin’ to kick a beat and now I’ve got a great job as a manager, despite rednecks like yo self trying to keep me down.

We need hate crime laws, but no one needs a god damn bumpkin band putting out anti Obama music.

Peace out.

It was a response to this video:

I don’t know where the guy lives, but I’ll bet he’s posting from his mother’s paneled rec room.

Michael W. Dean

My state of the Union speech, mid-January 2010

Friday, January 15th, 2010

So…..It’s horrible what happened in Haiti. And there have been some really inappropriate comments about it….Pat Robertson saying it’s the fault of Devil worship. (I’m not fan of voodoo, but really don’t believe it can cause natural disasters.) But I’m not sure I disagree with Rush Limbaugh saying “You already give to Haitian relief – it’s called the income tax.”

Then there are the conspiracy theorists saying the US caused the earthquake, to test their new HAARP array in Alaska, the High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program,

The objectives of the HAARP project became the subject of controversy in the mid-1990s, following claims that the antennas could be used as a weapon. A small group of U.S.physicists aired complaints in the Physics and Society letters, charging that the HAARP could be seeking ways to destroy or disable enemy spacecraft or disrupt communications over large portions of the planet. The physicist critics of the HAARP have had little complaint about the project’s current stage, but have expressed fears that it could in the future be expanded into an experimental weapon, especially given that its funding comes from the Office of Naval Research and the Air Force Research Laboratory.

I can’t even touch that theory….can’t wrap my head around the possibility of it. I suppose it’s possible that our gub’mint could be that evil, but I don’t think it’s what happened. I mainly think that there are too many amateur scientists in the world with good equipment who would have detected it.

I can say this: I think that Obama and Rahm “don’t let a crisis go to waste” Emanuel or Eric “shred the Constitution” Holder are going to bring a bunch of Haitian refugees to America, and fast track them to citizenship, just in time to vote Democrat in 2012. MARK MY WORDS.

If you think that’s politicizing a horrible situation, you’re right. But saying it is far less horrible than them DOING IT, which is politicizing in the process.

SPEAKING OF ERIC “SHRED THE CONSTITUTION” HOLDER, how about this?

Black Panther Voter Intimidation Case Dropped – WSJ.com

The episode—which Bartle Bull, a former civil rights lawyer and publisher of the left-wing Village Voice, calls “the most blatant form of voter intimidation I’ve ever seen”—began on Election Day 2008. Mr. Bull and others witnessed two Black Panthers in paramilitary garb at a polling place near downtown Philadelphia. (Some of this behavior is on YouTube.)

One of them, they say, brandished a nightstick at the entrance and pointed it at voters and both made racial threats. Mr. Bull says he heard one yell “You are about to be ruled by the black man, cracker!”

In the first week of January, the Justice Department filed a civil lawsuit against the New Black Panther Party and three of its members, saying they violated the 1965 Voting Rights Act by scaring voters with the weapon, uniforms and racial slurs. In March, Mr. Bull submitted an affidavit at Justice’s request to support its lawsuit.

Holder is refusing to pursue it.

You can be damn sure if it were white people (KKK, Tea Party, take your pick) intimidating black voters, they’d be in prison.

OK, and finally, The Supreme Court is trying a case whereby a sex offender was kept in prison after he’d finished serving his sentence. I think the powers that be intentionally used a kiddie porn guy for this case, because it will elicit a “THINK OF THE CHILDREN! HE MUST BE KEPT IN PRISON, FOR THE GOOD OF THE NATION!” response. The thing is, if this flies, they’ll eventually be able to keep anyone in prison for anything, just based on futurecrime.

Obama would love this.

Meanwhile, he and the Democrats are, behind closed doors (in violation of his campaign promises), selling out America and taking over 1/6 of our economy.

We live in strange times, folks. I’m worried. How about you?

I’ll say this: one of the reasons I have guns is to protect my home and loved ones from looters in a breakdown situation like Haiti’s earthquake or Hurricane Katrina. I would NOT want to have to wait for the government to protect me while roving gangs go door to door using violence to take what they want.

Me and my friend Nunzio did a good double-ender podcast yesterday, on this and a lot of other important subjects. Check it out.

–Michael W. Dean

AN OPEN LETTER TO THE REPUBLICAN PARTY

Wednesday, January 13th, 2010

AN OPEN LETTER TO THE REPUBLICAN PARTY
From: Michael W. Dean
Wyoming contact, Republican Liberty Caucus

Dear Republican Party,

In the next presidential election, and in all state and local elections, you need to support candidates who are true Republicans and genuine lovers of liberty. The party will not succeed if it does not run candidates who truly understand and respect the Constitution, including the Bill of Rights.

America was once a constitutionally limited republic, and it needs to be returned to that. In the past 100 years, and especially in the past 20 years, America has been reduced to a so-called “democracy”, where 51% of the people can rob and over-regulate 49% of the people.

A true constitutional republic could last in perpetuity; whereas democracies historically survive for 200 to 300 years. After that, they devolve into socialism or oligarchies, as the people who do not want to work vote into office people who will let them not work, and can pay them to do so by stealing from those who do work.

We are at a tipping point. America is in her 235th year. The next presidential election can determine if we regain our constitutional republic, or slide into a permanent “progressive” majority helmed by a deluded far-left who do not listen to the people, and are chomping at the bit to bankrupt us into a socialist oligarchy. Those folks see Republicans not as a force to work with in a bipartisan capacity, but as an impediment to robbing from the productive so they can “give” to those who have no desire or ability to produce.

If Washington followed the Constitution, it would barely matter who was president. The checks and balances would work. But ours has been co-opted into a popularity contest wherein people vote for the candidate with the slickest tongue and the shortest slogan….especially slogans like “HOPE” and “CHANGE.” As we’ve seen, these basically mean “Get me in, and you’ll find out my actual core beliefs later, when it’s too late.”

If the President and Congress followed the Constitution, DC would not be permitted to arbitrarily dictate most of what a citizen does in a given state. We need candidates who stand up for the Constitution, including the true meaning the Interstate Commerce Clause, and the original intent of all parts of the Bill of Rights, especially the First, Second and Tenth Amendments.

If the Republican Party establishment supports a spend-o-crat RINO (Republican in Name Only) in the next presidential election, you will guarantee a victory for the Democratic Party.

The Democrat Party used to have some principles, but has lately been taken over by a few dozen extreme leftist “progressives” with radical ideas and ties. They think they know what’s best for everyone, consider the Constitution a detriment, and consider Republicans a speed bump to be routed around behind closed doors.

America has woken up to the waste, “legal” stealing and “legal” bribes that can only lead to the destruction of America. The Democrats are largely responsible, but some Republicans have helped along the way. If you run a RINO for president, you will guarantee AINO (America in Name Only) in the near future, and forever.

The American people have finally woken up. Americans who have never been active in politics have taken to the streets by the millions. This is just the beginning.

The Democrats have been exposed for their gross spending of other people’s money at all levels, but in doing so have also shown that the Democrats aren’t the only ones. Some Republicans have contributed to this as well.

If you run a constitutional candidate like Gary Johnson, Tom Coburn, Jim DeMint, or Paul (Ron or Rand, take your pick) in the next presidential election, you’ll have a chance. I’ll vote Republican, and help out. So will millions of libertarians, tea partiers, swing voters, independents and even some of the smarter disgruntled Democrats. All combined, this will be enough to make the difference in the outcome of that election.

But 2012 is likely the very last year where even this will be possible. The leftists are working 24/7 to stack the deck against the possibility of retaining any America in America.

The Republican Party needs to run constitutional candidates, not only because it’s the right thing to do, but because it will keep the party from being perceived as “irrelevant naysayers” without any of their own ideas on how to make the country better. Running constitutional candidates will keep you from becoming a footnote in history. And even that footnote will likely be erased with time when a permanent socialist majority takes control of all media and education.

This road to serfdom can possibly be avoided, but it’s up to the Republican Party. You must run Barry Goldwater candidates, not George W. Bush, John McCain, or Rudy Giuliani candidates. Otherwise you’re going to end up with an America you don’t recognize, while you cling to your “Don’t blame me, I voted Republican” buttons.

Politics has become far too complicated. Lawmakers don’t think they’re doing their jobs if they don’t enact dozens of new laws and endless pork-barrel projects to “bring home the bacon” every day. This leads to honest folks becoming criminals, and the federal government having a stranglehold over every single aspect of our lives. We need candidates who will simplify, not complicate. We need candidates who will leash the beast, not feed the beast.

The Republican Party must run candidates who follow the Constitution and understand natural law… people who believe in their heart of hearts that government does not grant rights, does not restrict rights, but has only one legitimate role: protecting rights.

Our Founders are likely rolling in their graves at what the Democrats are doing now. But the Founders surely wouldn’t be pleased with what some in the Republican Party have done, either.

Why make us pick from the lesser of two evils? Here’s a novel idea: how about running someone who’s NOT evil!

Try it, you’ll like it. And America will be better for it.

–Michael W. Dean
http://www.libertarianpunk.com

We picked a good time to leave California

Tuesday, January 12th, 2010

Arnold Schwarzenegger to call for deep spending cuts, plead for U.S. aid

“….. he will propose the wholesale elimination of CalWorks, the state’s main welfare program,…”

“”…and a 14% salary cut for more than 200,000 state workers. …”
===
Cut welfare, cut funding to public services, sounds like halfway to a libertarian paradise. They’re also cutting salaries of police and firemen. I don’t wanna be there for the transition as this RINO (Republican in Name Only) mismanages the Golden State into chaos.

Glad me and the wife moved to Wyoming, a state that can actually pull its own weight. I saw this California collapse coming, which is why we got the hell out six months ago.

My prediction of the Los Angeles headlines a week after the budget cuts happen and welfare is stopped:

–Michael W. Dean

When guns are outlawed, outlaws will only have acid…..

Sunday, January 10th, 2010

Ever wonder what a perfect world it would be if guns were completely outlawed in your country? Well, guns are completely outlawed in Hong Kong and the UK….
Tourists Injured In Hong Kong Acid Attack

X-Ray Of Horrifying Knife Attack (UK)

This X-ray shows the savagery of the knife epidemic sweeping Britain’s streets. But this teenage boy is one of the lucky ones – he miraculously escaped death after the kitchen knife was plunged into his skull…..

==-

I could go on and on and on and on and on, but….you get the idea.

Michael W. Dean

Nullification Rally In Texas

Sunday, January 10th, 2010

To expound on my blog about nullification of “health care reform” I wanted to share information about a rally being held in Austin, TX. Several groups led by The Alliance of Texans Against Government Controlled Healthcare are hosting the rally. This event will take place January 16th, 2010 at 2:00 PM on the South side of the Texas Capitol Building. According to their website, it is “A rally to voice our support across Texas. We are serious about nullification and want the governor to call a special session to protect us from the federal government.”

The Texas Legislature meets for 140 days every two years. The latest session was adjourned in February of 2009, so a special session would need to be called in order to nullify any federal legislation. The power to call that special session rests with Governor Rick Perry. Gov. Perry has made bold statements in regards to the federal takeover of health care.

“… I’m certainly willing and ready for the fight if this administration continues to try to force their very expansive government philosophy down our collective throats.” July 23, 2009.

The time for talk is drawing to an end, and it is now time to see if Gov. Perry is willing to take the steps necessary to make the will of the people known. The current administration has promised transparency and honest debate, but has resorted to meetings behind closed doors, political bribery of representatives, and rushing legislation through in the cover of darkness. The time has come for the states to stand up and say “ENOUGH!”

For more information, please see http://www.notintexas.org/.

-Justin West

They’re all the same, stupid.

Saturday, January 9th, 2010

Go ahead and hate me.  You have plenty of reasons why, but I will give you one that will probably fill my e-mail box with letters of frothing hatred and disgust from many of you.

I voted for Barack Obama.

Stunned?   Shocked?  Go ahead, I was too.   I didn’t plan on doing so.  Up until about 6 weeks before the election, I was undecided and probably looking towards not voting because I really couldn’t stomach either major candidate and Bob Barr… well, come on, it’s Bob Barr, and we all know that the LP doesn’t stand a snowball’s chance in hell on the national stage because we don’t even have the patience or gumption to win smaller offices first.  But that’s a topic for another post.  I want to say that I voted for Barack Obama not because I believed in his “hope and change” platform, but because I believed that the Republican Party abandoned their principles, abandoned anything close to libertarianism a long time ago, and it no longer deserves my vote or support.  I am not going to vote for the lesser of two evils, I will vote for the most evil until the alternative runs something GOOD.  Don’t you get it?  Voting for John McCain and Sarah Palin would have been like rearranging the deck lounges on the Titanic.  I didn’t, and still do not believe, that there’s that much of a difference anyway, and that is evidenced by Obama’s constant caving to the center.

I laugh at the people who thought that Barack Obama was going to sweep into office and change the face of this country overnight.  Truth is, he’s not.  As president he is constrained, because his actions and what he chooses to do can affect whether or not Democrats maintain the Congress at the end of this year.  That’s why he isn’t spending any political capital to make many of the changes that he promised during his campaign.  Notice the conflicting messages all over the place- Nancy Pelosi says we’re at war against private health insurers, while the Obama plan creates a giant giveaway to private insurers backed by government gunpoint.  Obama says he’s going to end the war and bring the troops home, and then we see him sending more to Afghanistan using a McCain-endorsed surge strategy.  Michael’s right in his analysis that liberals are becoming disillusioned with Obama.  I wonder when conservatives will be likewise.

When are we going to stop pointing the finger at Barack Obama and start pointing it at the people who betrayed the principles of limited government that they once stood for?  It’s easy to look at Obama as the next Mao, Stalin, Castro, but Barack Obama never denied he was a liberal.  He embraced it and for a while, even reclaimed it, until he became skittish about delivering on his ‘change’ and settled for ‘compromise’ instead.  And yet,  he was recently blamed for everything under the sun just a few posts down from this one.  The truth, however, is a lot more complex and alarming, and that is that statism and tyranny knows no party affiliation.  This country ceased being truly free decades ago, and will become less free as the years go by, as we are constantly on a war footing, and as our decisions are motivated not by principle but by fear.  As long as we believe that something is out to get us and our children, we will flock to politicians and throw our liberty at their feet and demand that they save us from the bogeymen- sorry, bogeypersons.

So, I did vote for Obama, in part because I believe that a country gets the government it deserves, and also because I am not afraid of him or his policies.  If they’re good policies then they will work and people will be happy, if they’re lousy policies then they will fail and someone else will come in and the process repeats.  All of this talk about Obama becoming some kind of mega-dictator and having megalomaniacal aspirations is just paranoia and lunacy.  It’s the same thing many on the far left said about President Bush, that he would find a way to stay in office past his two terms and suspend the Bill of Rights.  Fuck people, they don’t have to suspend the Bill of Rights when most of us would be willing to give it away for the illusion of safety and security.

I also voted for Obama in hopes that maybe, just maybe, Republicans will think long and hard before saddling us with someone like the Alaskan Quitbull.  We don’t need any more imperialist neo-cons drunk on Jesus appealing to the stupidest and most short-sighted among us.  We need principled, liberty-minded conservatives who believe in protecting individual rights, who believe in not handing over the reins of power to unaccountable giant corporations who are selling out the American people to pelase their stockholders.  We need people who believe that IF WE CAN’T AFFORD IT THEN WE JUST HAVE TO DO WITHOUT.  There were no tea parties when Bush was spending hand over fist (I called for them but nobody listened), no protest at the fact that he waited until 2006 to veto his first bill which was a pointless fucking ban on embryonic stem cell research funding.  Yes, his first veto wasn’t a bloated omnibus bill or Ted Kennedy’s medicare expansion, no, it was a piece of red meat to the lunatic Christian Right who thinks that frozen zygotes that will just be discarded are PEOPLE.  The wars we’re fighting now in Iraq and Afghanistan are being funded by borrowed money, our nations’ credit rating is in the crapper, and it’s all because George W. Bush thought we could fight two wars without any kind of sacrifice on the part of the citizens.  Let our soldiers fight and die, and keep the rest of us distracted, fat, and stupid.  How dare anyone suggest I vote for a Republican when this is the best they have to offer.

Barack Obama has done lots of things worthy of criticism, of that there is no doubt.  But I ask, what good is voting for a Republican if he’s simply going to take the gun from Obama, smile, pat him on the shoulder, and point it at us all over again?

~Matt Frost

The Obama-moon is over

Saturday, January 9th, 2010

My friend Andy said: Judging by how my pro-Obama coworkers and in-laws do NOT want to talk about politics any more, I’d say the honeymoon is completely over.

I replied:

….. Kind of like how when a guy starts dating a totally hot chick, brags to everyone all the time about the totally hot chick……then it comes out that she’s cheatin’ on him, treats him like shit, and is only after him for his money?

–Michael W. Dean

Free feisty libertarian punk rock MP3s for our readers

Friday, January 8th, 2010

So….for the time being, our readers may download the RIGHT ARM OF WYOMING CD free!

DOWNLOAD is HERE, right click to save.

You can still buy the CD for only 12 bucks, and once the initial pressing of 1000 is gone (fairly soon), I’m probably not repressing. I’m on to making the second CD now, and I don’t like to “paint the same picture twice.”

WHY ARE YOU GIVING THIS AWAY?

I make enough to get by on my day job, writing tech books and how-to stuff. Even though this music is better than most stuff done by people who “define themselves as being in a band”, that’s not me. At least not anymore. I have no plans to tour or get signed, I’ve been there and done that. Touring the gin mills of the world, playing for beer and gas money, and waking up next to hot crazy women whose name I can’t remember….well, that’s no longer in my plans. I’ve done the hell out of it, and lived to tell the tale, and that’s enough.

This music exists to pass on a message. Giving away downloads isn’t taking any food off the table, and I’ve also found that people who download don’t usually buy things. So I’ll still sell as many CDs. Maybe more, given my past experiences doing things like this.

WHAT’S IN THE DOWNLOAD?

It’s a 101-meg zip file of all the MP3s of the new album. Also included is the lyric sheet and cover art. It takes about 90 seconds to download on DSL. The MP3s are high-quality encodes (192k / 44,100 k, 16-bit joint stereo MP3s, properly tagged). Download, unzip, and you can drag them right into your iPod, iPhone, or whatever chromed-robot-turd folks are carrying this week, and they’ll light up your day.

WHAT SHOULD WE DO?

Tell two friends. Blog. Twitter, Facebook, or whatever you kids are doing these days. Get this shit out there.

Also available on BitTorrent, if you prefer (please seed if you do that.)

Michael W. Dean

From Angry Peasant Records. Angry Peasant Records is a division of the Nestlandia Institute Libertarian Think Tank

SONG LISTING:

1. GET OFF MY PROPERTY!
2. MY GUN KEEPS YOU HONEST
3. REDISTRIBUTION OF THEFT
4. GOVERNMENT IS A COLLECTIVE HALLUCINATION
5. GUN CONTROL GETS WOMEN RAPED
6. LIBERTY IN SHARDS
7. FREAKY LIBERAL MAMMAL SEX
8. FAKIN’ THE RACE CARD
9. SINGLE CRACKLING BLUE FLASH
10. WE ARE THE GOOD GUYS!
11. US Bill of Rights (read by Mrs. Dean)
12. LETTER TO A YOUNG ME (SPOKEN)
13. MY GUN KEEPS YOU HONEST – CLEAN VERSION FOR RADIO

Chicago Police may scrap entrance exam

Friday, January 8th, 2010

Obama’s home town is thinking the unthinkable:

http://www.suntimes.com/news/cityhall/1975918,CST-NWS-policeexam06web.article

http://www.nbcchicago.com/news/local-beat/chicago-police-scrap-entrance-exam-80790827.html

It’s a sad day when you have to foster “diversity” by dumbing things down.

Dropping the exam would bolster minority hiring and avert legal battles, according to one source, while others confirm that the exam could be scrapped to open the process to as many people as possible

However, the lack of an exam would make Chicago the lone major city without one, and experts contend that the exam is integral to eliminating unqualified applicants.

You know something’s a bad idea when even a Union chief says “It’s ‘too stupid to be true.”

My opinion? An unintended consequence is that this could be Chicago’s way around the NRA lawsuits they’ve had post-Heller regarding handgun ownership. “Whatta ya mean we don’t issue handgun permits. We’ll let anyone carry a gun….”

Michael W. Dean

Obama’s transgressions

Thursday, January 7th, 2010

Today all the news networks did a couple hours of teasers, saying “Obama is going to make a shocking announcement today.”

I thought he was going to announce “While in our secret closed-door health care meeting, me and my fellow socialist Dems found a way to change the Constitution and ban guns. And we’ve also made a deal to make France the 51st state. And I’m putting Osama bin Laden in charge of the TSA, because he knows how those terrorist folks think.”

But that’s just me and where my head goes with things. At this point, those are about the only things Obama could say that would shock me.

The “shocking” thing advertised was just Obama pretending to have some accountability for security breakdowns. Just him trying to be as un-George Bush as his focus groups could come up with.

Yawn.

The reason not much Obama could do would shock me is everything he’s done already. Every few days for the first six months or so of Obama’s reign, my jaw dropped at something the man or his cronies have done to America. My jaw stopped dropping around June or July.

Here’s a list I started a while back. I’ve given up updating it:

I was mainly looking for
– Anything unconstitutional
– Broken campaign promises
– Lying
– Bad decisions that are bad for America
– Just bad presidenting (i.e. stuff that would appall you even if you were a Democrat, albeit a smart one)

OK, I’ll start, with all I remember, or have heard that he’s “ALLEGEDLY” done:

1. broke campaign promise of “no new taxes” by taxing cigarettes and electricity, and trying to mandate health care with a fine and jail time for non-compliance.
2. Trying to send all kids to public school 24/7
3. Talked about reinstating “assault weapon ban”, (but changed his mind, for now)
4. Let his attorney general go after the CIA for doing what they had to do.
5. Wanted to release photos of waterboarding
6. Has an idiot VP (who was only there for the white vote) who has only said about four things, all of them stupid and/or threats to national security
7. Has a DHS that believes that most white middle-aged conservatives, libertarians, third-party voters and many vets are potential terrorists
8. Appoints “czars” (for example Van Jones and Cass Sunstein) who literally used to be terrorists, and who still are communist
9. Puts a guy (Geithner) in charge of the Fed and IRS who couldn’t figure out how to use “TurboTax”
10. Appointed a bunch of czars waiting in the wings who:
a. Want to give animals the right to sue
b. Want to outlaw hunting
c. Want to make it illegal NOT to donate your organs when you die
d. Want to use forced sterilization on people
e. Want to be able to shut down parts of the Internet
f. Are pervert ex-druggies in charge of schools
g. etc. etc. ect.
11. Obama CLEARLY said in pre-election interviews that he wants to “redistribute the wealth” (and used that term), but says he’s not socialist!
12. Wants Congress to sign a 1000-page heath care bill without giving them time to read it
13. Wants to close Gitmo with one hand, while opening many much-worse Gitmos with the other
14. Doesn’t understand 8th grade math. Thinks he can spend our way out of debt.
15. Claims he didn’t know much about ACORN, and didn’t know that they got federal money: AFTER ACORN was a large part of getting him elected.
16. Continually apologizes for America
17. Said “America is the largest Muslim nation”
18. “A new era of transparency. 5 days of public review for any major legislation.” Where?
19. More warrantless wiretapping.
20. Claimed “No tax increase on those making less than 250k. Not a dime!”, then increased their taxes, and continues to do so
21. Says the Economic Recovery Act had “no pork in it”
22. Dropping charges against armed, uniformed men, who were intentionally intimidating voters at polling place(s) on election day
23. Says he’s not a socialist while acting like a socialist.
24. Says he’s not increasing the size of the Federal Government while increasing the size of the Federal Government.
25. Broke campaign promise to rescind “don’t ask don’t tell”
26. Broke campaign promise to decriminalize marijuana (and laughed at people who smoke marijuana when asked about it)
27. Cap ‘n’ trade. Immoral, stealing from producers of wealth and jobs, just creates a new false economy (and a new “stock market”) and fortunes for his liberal buddies.
28. Cash for Clunkers. Didn’t work. Who would want to put health care in charge of the folks who bungled Cash for Clunkers?
29. Disrespects the 2nd Amendment (and the 1st Amendment, when it doesn’t favor him)
30. Let the NEA use Fed grant money to produce propaganda with his image on it
31. Posted photos of himself with the daughters of leader of Spain, illegal in Spain (for security of the daughters)
32. Allowed that “show of force” low flyover of Manhattan that scared the hell out of everybody
33. Expanded extraordinary rendition while simultaneously claiming he was ending torture.
34. Campaigned on “more transparency”, has a bitchin’ YouTube channel and MySpace page, but is having technical difficulties getting the health care bill online
35.-3029. Khalid Sheikh Mohammed To Be Tried In Civilian Court

That last one would be #35, but I made it “#35 through #3029.”
I added in the 2,995 people killed on 9/11.

That’s all I can think of for now. I know there’s a lot more.

Michael W. Dean

A short, logical thought against gun control

Wednesday, January 6th, 2010

I’m from the government and I’m here to help. Give me your guns! It’s for your own good!”

Gun control does not prevent crime. Gun control disarms victims, increases crime, and makes criminals out of honest people.

Gun control does not prevent crime, because criminals, by definition, do not obey laws.

Terrorists are a good example of why gun control does not work. Next time there’s a terrorist attack because the powers that be are asleep at the switch, and Rahm “don’t let a crisis go to waste” Emanuel or Eric “let’s try terrorists in criminal court” Holder tries to ban guns, remember this: explosives are much more tightly regulated, much more illegal than guns. Yet terrorists can always can get their hands on explosives. Let me repeat that short thought, because it’s important. Explosives are much more tightly regulated, much more illegal than guns. Yet terrorists can always can get their hands on explosives.

Gun control doesn’t work. Just say no to voting for politicians who claim they “know what’s best for you” (in anything). And remember, the politicians who want to take away guns from common folk are themselves protected by Marines and Secret Service with guns, 24/7.

The attitude of Gun-grabboid politicians is that they’re important and worth protecting, you’re not.

I’m not single-issue about guns, but I will say this: a politician’s stance on citizen gun possession is my most important “acid test” when I look at their record. Because if they don’t trust me, an honest man, with guns, I don’t trust them to “run my life.”

–Michael W. Dean

Gettin’ myself on the no-fly list

Wednesday, January 6th, 2010

The only tiny positive spin I can put on my daughter’s death is that there is no longer anyone on the planet I am afraid of embarrassing by speaking my mind all the time. I previously held back some stuff in public, out of respect for her. But since she died, I’ve made a decision to lay it out from here on out. Fuck it.

(Me and Amelia, a few months before she died)

I’m not worried about embarrassing my family. My mother is dead. My older sisters are inveterate liberals, who lulled me to sleep singing “Where Have All the Flowers Gone?” My brother is a Republican. My dad is a very patriotic Republican who wholeheartedly stands by all I am doing, though he wishes I wouldn’t cuss so much. But like it says on my band’s lyric sheet:

I am incredibly pissed at what’s going on in America right now, and I’m going to complain. Every day since Obama was elected has been an exercise in “What the fuck are they doing now”? If I woke up tomorrow and they said it was illegal to wear a hat, it would not surprise me. If they said they’d outlawed Christianity, it would not surprise me. When Nancy Pelosi lied and promised “The Most Transparent, Ethical Congress” while Obama refuses to let cameras in his backdoor-bribing Democrat-only health care bill group (thus breaking a campaign promise to keep things “transparent”), I was not surprised.

I am going to complain loudly. It may not be good for me in the long run. I predict it will get me put on the no-fly list. I don’t care. I’ve seen America, seen Europe, I’m home in Wyoming and have no need to go anywhere.

The ironic thing if I end up on the no-fly list is this: I AM NOT THE GUY THEY’RE LOOKING FOR. I would never harm anyone on a plane unless someone tried to hijack it or blow it up. In that case, I would be willing to die trying to take the guy down. On top of that, I’m a damn polite, patient flyer, and much more prepared than most idiots in a given airport. I actually have my ticket and I.D. out when I get to the front of the line, unlike the guy in front of me who’s always fumbling for his, despite having had a few hours of repeated warnings. I deal with their cavity searches with the patience of a monk. Like I said, I’m an ideal flyer.

But moreover, I AM NOT THE GUY THEY’RE LOOKING FOR. Sure, Janet Napolitano has something against white, middle-aged people who have read the Constitution and own guns, which is ironic considering this:

And in the light of the undie bomber only getting quashed by someone like me, who was willing to kick ass to protect others, and Napolitano claiming “the system worked“, she and her whole inept ilk are scrambling to “tighten the holes” and part of that is increasing the size of the no-fly list. How much do you wanna bet they add a whole bunch of innocent white, middle-aged people who have read the Constitution and own guns?

Here’s my theory. In a socialist-leaning administration, where the President is friends with people who couldn’t have passed a FBI background check a few years ago, back when America was saner, everything is flip-flopped. Patriotic Americans are suspect. Good is evil, and evil is good.

I think the DHS, CIA, FBI, White House, etc. was so busy watching honest, patriotic Republican and libertarian Americans for “warning signs” that they’re missing all the radical Islamist madmen who are truly out to destroy America.

I think the same thing happened under Bill Clinton. My theory is that under his direction, his administration was so busy watching honest, patriotic Republican and libertarian Americans for “warning signs” that they missed all the radical Islamist madmen who are truly out to destroy America.

So, the powers that be might just no-fly me, tap my phone, and read my e-mail. I’ve got nothing to hide but my privacy.

And I’m not a violent person. I’m a sweet cat who cares about life and people. I’m upset that America is being robbed and raped at gunpoint. I will not be quiet. But while they’re busy watching me, and millions of peaceful Americans like me, people who are simply productively exercising our First- and Second-Amendment rights, the powers that be are likely to miss someone who really is out to harm America.

–Michael “sweet cat” Dean

Still Charging At Windmills

Tuesday, January 5th, 2010

All my life, I’ve had a big fucking mouth.  At times, it’s gotten me into trouble, but for the most part, it’s been a blessing.  I still identify with the innocent child who incessantly asks “why?” after he’s told what to do by his parents or teachers.  “Why” quickly becomes a four-letter word when you’re a kid, followed by the “because I said so” retort, and adults do their best to beat that kind of questioning right out of your little skull. 

Of course, I did grow up eventually, and learned that there were reasons for being told what to do, but I still have this raw nerve in me when it comes to someone trying to assert authority over me, whether it’s my boss, a police officer, anyone.  I don’t like being forced to do anything whether it’s good for me or not.  This is what lays at the core of my political philosophy, that civilized people do not use force or fraud to get one another to do what they want.

Force and fraud are the two ways by which the individual often finds their rights violated, their propety damaged or stolen, and their person possibly harmed.  Government and the entire body of law that supports it is charged with the task of defending individuals from these violations.  However, when the government becomes too big in scope and their powers exceed the boundaries set upon it by the states through the Constitution,  it becomes the chief violator of individual rights instead of the defender. 

Most liberals would defend the free speech of a pornographic magazine or website (some would not but most would).  They would say things like “I don’t like it but it should be allowed to exist, the government shouldn’t tell consenting adults what they can read and view”.  Even more to the point- the ACLU has defended the free speech rights of neo-Nazis to march on public property, because even though their views are odious, it is not for the government to decide which views are allowed to be expressed.  Get where I am going here?  The First Amendment protects the rights of people who express unpopular opinions, as it should.  Popular speech, while also protected, seldom faces the prospect of being silenced at government gunpoint.

So why, then, does the same not hold true when it comes to other people who may be considered unpopular, like, say, the rich?  You’ll find very few liberals who believe that those who make more money should not be taxed at a higher percentage than those who make less.  Defending the rich is definitely an unpopular position these days due to how easy it is to whip up class envy.  Yet, if I am to be consistent in my views, the rich should have the right to their earnings just as much as the pornographer should have the right to publish erotic material.  I believe that the rich have a moral obligation to help the less fortunate, but the minute that becomes a legal requirement through excessive and heavy-handed taxation, it becomes government-sponsored theft.

Why, then, does that liberal principle of defending individual rights not extend, for the most part, to people who own guns?  How come a neo-Nazi marching down the street praising Hitler is in accordance with the First Amendment, but an average citizen wanting to carry a gun for self-defense is not in accordance with the Second Amendment?  I still don’t understand after all these years and hundreds upon hundreds of gun laws, why don’t they get the fact that a criminal gives less than a shit if he’s breaking one or ten more laws by carrying an illegal weapon, and that it’s only people who attempt to comply with the law that are left at the mercy of those criminals?  What happens if there is, say, a massive power grid failure, or another natural disaster like Hurricane Katrina, and the government cannot protect you from people who now think it’s open season on you and your property?  How would you like your FEMA-issued tombstone?

The leftist ideology believes in forcing everyone to comply for their own good and the good of all, because they said so.  Apparently they know what is best for every one of us, and as individuals, we are incapable of making our own decisions and choosing our own paths.  What I have written above is just the tip of the iceberg, when you look at all the nanny-state laws on the books at every level of government, when you look at “mandatory volunteering” in which students have to do some kind of community service in order to graduate from public schools (well, you don’t HAVE to get a diploma, they would say).  They hold their ideals up as noble but use the force of a leviathan government to strongarm taxpayers into compliance.

And if you don’t comply, they either come and arrest you or shoot you in your own home.

I still react to this like I did when I was a sixth grader.  I’m angered and incensed that individual rights are always being put on the chopping block, and not just by leftie do-gooder liberals but also by statist, religious conservatives in the Republican party.  I meant what I said when I suggested the sub-header for this site- Keep your fucking hands off- my property, my person, my religion, my rights, and I will do the same for you.  Why is this so hard for people to grasp?

~Matt Frost

I’m never flying again.

Monday, January 4th, 2010

The current administration, filled with people who will not call a terrorist a terrorist, and issues warnings about the possibility white people going postal but never use the “Muslim extremist” tag on Muslim extremists, have a new plan: SHOCK COLLARS FOR AIRLINE PASSENGERS!

from The Washington Times:

Just when you thought you’ve heard it all…

A senior government official with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has expressed great interest in a so-called safety bracelet that would serve as a stun device, similar to that of a police Taser®. According to a video (below) found at the Lamperd Less Lethal, Inc. website, the bracelet would be worn by all airline passengers (video also shown below).

This bracelet would:

• Take the place of an airline boarding pass

• Contain personal information about the traveler

• Be able to monitor the whereabouts of each passenger and his/her luggage

• Shock the wearer on command, completely immobilizing him/her for several minutes

Here are my thoughts: First they try it on airline passengers. Then they try it on paroled felons. Then they try it on loud complainers (like me). Then they try it on everybody, all the time. (Including you.)

These people get an inch, and take a mile.

Also, couldn’t a hijacker cut off the bracelet? And couldn’t someone hack the system and shock a whole plane full (or a whole airport full) of innocents?

My alternative? Allow honest citizens to be armed on airplanes, using frangible ammo that cannot pierce the skin of the plane. Of course they’ll never do that, because it is free, would work, and they don’t like their “subjects ” to be armed.

Michael W. Dean

What can Congress legally do?

Saturday, January 2nd, 2010

Congress has no powers — none — other than the ones listed at the end of this post. If your representative is doing anything not on this list, e-mail em, ask ‘em why they’re defying the Constitution, and send ‘em this list.

A lot of what Congress claims they can do, when they’re doing something they can’t do, is based on “creative” interpretations of the Interstate Commerce Clause.

Nancy Pelosi, when asked “What in the Constitution gives Congress the right to enact universal health care”, she said “Are you serious“? (As in “Constitution? Are you serious? I’m Nancy fuckin’ Pelosi! I don’t have to read that old crap!”)

She later followed up, after consulting with her legal beagles, that it was the Interstate Commerce Clause that “allowed” Congress to force required healthcare down everyone’s throat.

Yet when states try to assert States’ Rights, particularly through The 10th Amendment…

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

–The 10th Amendment of the Bill of Rights of the Constitution of the United States

…the FedGov usually says “Oh no you don’t!” And the state says “Why not?” and the Feds say “BECAUSE WE SAY SO!”

The FedGov did this to Tennessee when Tennessee tried to assert that guns and ammo made, sold and used only WITHIN the state, did not fall under the purvue of the FedGov.

Wyoming is putting a 10th Amendment demand on the ballot in 2010. It will likely pass. Wish us luck enforcing it!

10th Amendment Resolutions
These non-binding resolutions, often called “state sovereignty resolutions” do no carry the force of law. Instead, they are intended to be a statement of the legislature of the state. They play an important role, however.

If you owned an apartment building and had a tenant not paying rent, you wouldn’t show up with an empty truck to kick them out without first serving notice. That’s how we view these Resolutions – as serving “notice and demand” to the Federal Government to “cease and desist any and all activities outside the scope of their constitutionally-delegated powers.” Follow-up, of course, is a must.

These people in Congress, primarily Democrats, are NOT DOING THEIR JOBS. They’re being tyrannical. So are most of the folks in Obama’s cabinet. They are fucking around with our lives. They’re stealing our God-given and Constitutionally guaranteed liberties….all while smiling and standing in front of American flags (which makes me sick). 2010 midterm elections will give the People a chance to speak by throwing the Democrat bums out of office. Some say it’s too late, we’re doomed. I say it’s not. I’m encouraging everyone I can to vote in those elections. For liberty leaning Republicans. Start educating yourself now. The Republican Liberty Caucaus is a good place to start.

SO, WHAT CAN CONGRESS LEGALLY DO?

(From the Constitution of the United States)

Enumerated powers of Congress:

  • Section 8: The Congress shall have power To lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts and excises, to pay the debts and provide for the common defence and general welfare of the United States; but all duties, imposts and excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;
  • To borrow money on the credit of the United States;
  • To regulate commerce with foreign nations, and among the several states, and with the Indian tribes;
  • To establish a uniform rule of naturalization, and uniform laws on the subject of bankruptcies throughout the United States;
  • To coin money, regulate the value thereof, and of foreign coin, and fix the standard of weights and measures;
  • To provide for the punishment of counterfeiting the securities and current coin of the United States;
  • To establish post offices and post roads;
  • To promote the progress of science and useful arts, by securing for limited times to authors and inventors the exclusive right to their respective writings and discoveries;
  • To constitute tribunals [courts] inferior to the Supreme Court;
  • To define and punish piracies and felonies committed on the high seas, and offenses against the law of nations;
  • To declare war, grant letters of marque and reprisal, and make rules concerning captures on land and water;
  • To raise and support armies, but no appropriation of money to that use shall be for a longer term than two years;
  • To provide and maintain a navy;
  • To make rules for the government and regulation of the land and naval forces;
  • To provide for calling forth the militia to execute the laws of the union, suppress insurrections and repel invasions;
  • To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the militia, and for governing such part of them as may be employed in the service of the United States, reserving to the states respectively, the appointment of the officers, and the authority of training the militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;
  • To exercise exclusive legislation in all cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten miles square) as may, by cession of particular states, and the acceptance of Congress, become the seat of the government of the United States, and to exercise like authority over all places purchased by the consent of the legislature of the state in which the same shall be, for the erection of forts, magazines, arsenals, dockyards, and other needful buildings;-And
  • To make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution the foregoing powers, and all other powers vested by this Constitution in the government of the United States, or in any department or officer thereof.

SO…when you see your representatives breaking the law (and you SHOULD know who your reps are!), you can contact ‘em here:
https://writerep.house.gov/writerep/welcome.shtml

I did.

Or if you’d rather not do it through the Gov’s site, you can do it through the NRA site:
http://capwiz.com/nra/dbq/officials/

–Michael W. Dean

Dancin’ with a gun pointed at you

Friday, January 1st, 2010

So, in Times Square, the Feds, under Eric Holder’s direction, had sharpshooters on the roofs of all the buildings this year.

I don’t know about you, but I always feel more festive when I know someone’s looking at me through a rifle scope.

Again:

“The nine most terrifying words in the English language are ‘I’m from the government and I’m here to help’.”
–Ronald Reagan

MWD

TSA hired goons go after blogger, take his computer from his home

Friday, January 1st, 2010

HAPPY NEW YEAR!

Full article at Yid with a Lid.

excerpt:

(Blogger Steven Frischling said): a sedan pulled in front of my house and two US Transportation Security Administration Special Agents were at my door with some questions and paperwork for me. I sent two of my kids upstairs, and like Chris I was served a subpoena by the Department of Homeland Security to disclose who sent me the contents of SD-1544-09-06 (you can read Chris’ subpoena HERE)

The two Special Agents were at my house for more than two hours speaking with me as I held my youngest son in my arms most of the time. When the agent left they said they’d see me again tomorrow morning, and hopefully we come to a resolution.

The two bloggers published the document in question within minutes of each other Dec. 27. It was originally sent by the TSA to airlines and airports around the world and described temporary new requirements for screening passengers through Dec. 30, including conducting “pat-downs” of legs and torsos. The document, which was not classified, was posted by numerous bloggers. Information from it was also published on some airline websites.

Frischling told Wired

“They’re saying it’s a security document but it was sent to every airport and airline. It was sent to Islamabad, to Riyadh and to Nigeria. So they’re looking for information about a security document sent to 10,000-plus people internationally. You can’t have a right to expect privacy after that.”

Transportation Security Administration spokeswoman Suzanne Trevino said in a statement that security directives “are not for public disclosure.”

It seems more likely that the Department of Homeland Security who oversees the TSA, was looking to shift some of the pressure away from its embattled director Janet Napalitano

“TSA’s Office of Inspections is currently investigating how the recent Security Directives were acquired and published by parties who should not have been privy to this information,” the statement said.

Gee, they sent out 10,000 of the document and allowed the airlines to post parts on their website and the DHS wants to know how it got out?

==============

Thoughts from LibertarianPunk on this? Two quotes:

“No Socialist Government conducting the entire life and industry of the country could afford to allow free, sharp, or violently-worded expressions of public discontent. They would have to fall back on some form of Gestapo, no doubt very humanely directed in the first instance.”

–Winston Churchill

And I said it yesterday, but it bears repeating:

“The nine most terrifying words in the English language are ‘I’m from the government and I’m here to help’.”

–Ronald Reagan

–Michael W. Dean

At least I earn my keep.

Thursday, December 31st, 2009

I deliver pizza.

That’s right, I said it.  It’s the truth.  I deliver pizza.  Not part time, either.  This is my full-time job that pays my bills, and I am proud of it.

I’m not saying it’s the best job, or that there’s loads of opportunity for advancement, but it’s a job that I don’t wake up and dread going to.  It’s a job I don’t hate.  I’m not inside with a boss breathing down my neck all the time, and I can listen to my Sirius radio while I am on the road.  I also make enough money to support my modest lifestyle, and I never have a problem getting a night off to play a gig.  It’s good, honest work for good, honest pay.

But you know, it gets to be tiring when you go back home to family functions, or worse- a school reunion, and people ask you what you are doing.  I don’t feel bad about telling them, I just don’t need the aggravation of having to defend my occupation, and I don’t want to deal with pontificating sermons about how I should be doing something else with my life.  Excuse me, it’s MY life.  Knock off the condescending attitude.

I am proud because I work for a living and I am not asking anyone else- mom, dad, or the government- to float me while I “find myself”.  I think it’s funny that most people consider the job I do beneath them, when I know that most people who attempt to deliver food even part time fail at it.  It’s not an “easy” job.  I’m not going to go through the laundry list because the point of this post is not to vent about my job, but if you want to know what the job is really like and what we endure, hop on over to the TipThePizzaGuy.com site.  Read some of the delivery stories, look at what some of the pitfalls of this job is, and check out the forums.


Tip etiquette for pizza delivery (tipthepizzaguy.com)

The point is, I work for a living.  I don’t see how someone who is of sound mind and able body can just sit back and demand that those like me provide them, through our taxes, such things as food, housing, and subsidized utilities.  It infuriates me beyond reason when I deliver to these houses, and they have expensive appliances and furniture, and they’re trying to pay for their food with a welfare card.  It aggravates me even more when I see giant corporations looting the United States Treasury for bailout money, only to turn and give millions to executives for bonuses they should not have earned.  I mean, how does one get a bonus if the company fails?

Most people would agree that some taxation is necessary, but I don’t see how anyone can look at the tax burden we have now and say that it’s justified.  That’s what you get, though, when you allow the government to write blank checks drawn on all of our bank accounts and those of our children and grandchildren.  That’s what we got when the 16th Amendment to the Constitution was rammed through, giving Congress the power to tax income.  Originally it was only for the very ultra-wealthy, and now it’s a cattle prod that steals from us all, that redistributes our hard-earned money into the pockets of those who did nothing to earn it.  I don’t care if you’re Octo-Mom with 14 kids on welfare or the CEO of AIG, you don’t deserve one red cent of anyone else’s money.

–Matt Frost

“I’m not crazy! You’re the one who’s crazy!” – almost END-OF-THE-DECADE FIRESIDE CHAT FROM MWD

Thursday, December 31st, 2009

By Michael W. Dean

As we smash headlong into yet another decade, the fifth I’ve participated in during my 45 spins around this big blue ball, I reflect on the past and look toward the future. And the main thought that strikes me is ‘WHAT THE FUCK?????”

I really long for the days when I didn’t have to think about politics all the time. When I talked with friends about movies, music, art, dreams, life, love. Now most of what I think about is “THOSE LIBERALS ARE FUCKING CRAZY! THEY’RE KILLING EVERYTHING THAT’S GOOD!”

The ironic thing is, they love to call us (conservatives and libertarians) crazy. And selfish. Crazy for not wanting to regulate everything. Selfish for not wanting to be robbed at gunpoint for leftist “social justice” programs.

And it really is robbery at gunpoint. If you refuse to pay taxes, police will come to your house. If you refuse to come out, they’ll come in, point guns at your head, and take you to jail. All taxation, beyond the bare minimum outlined in the Constitution is theft. The government has no resources, and has to take my money to give you anything. And they do everything far less efficiently than the private sector.

I am a reasonable, peaceful man. And I’m happy to live in America, which really is, to quote patriot Boston T. Party, “the sickest patient in the cancer ward.” And he said that a long time ago, America has gotten a lot more sick recently.

And to quote Dead Kennnedy’s singer and head rabble rouser Jello Biafra,

I’m thankful I live in a place
Where I can say the things I do
Without being taken out and shot
So I’m on guard against the goons
Trying to take my rights away
We’ve got to rise above the need for cops and laws

(I love these lyrics, but I find it ironic that the guy who penned them believed in the “Hope and Change” of Obama, the “BIGGER bigger problem we’ve got now“, and is disappointed that Obama’s not the Second Coming of Christ.)

I don’t want to be taken out and shot. I shouldn’t be, I don’t break any laws, but I think that the folks in “power” now may start changing the laws. And I think Obama, Holder, Pelosi et al. may just be the “kinder, gentler” Lenins that paves way for a Stalin in a few years, if we’re not careful.

Execution of 56 Polish civilians in Bochnia during the German occupation of Poland; December 18, 1939

How do I deal with wanting to scream “THESE LIBERALS ARE CRAZY, AND THEY’RE STEALING FROM ME!”? Well…I live my life. I love sweetly on my wife. I talk to her, and listen to her. She’s the smartest person I know. I hug my cats. I say the Serenity Prayer.

God, grant me the serenity
To accept the things I cannot change;
The courage to change the things that I can;
And the wisdom to know the difference.

I work on political activism, gleefully writing feisty blog posts in the middle of the night, with a gun on my desk and a much bigger gun a few feet away.

I also try to educate younger people, being the “hip old grandpa Simpson of punk rock” and a few of them do listen to me…sometimes. I also work with various groups…some concerned with trying to get people to vote, some who don’t think voting works. But both have agendas similar to mine: liberty.

Then I wonder if maybe being an activist isn’t trying to “change the things I can’t.” But then I realize that when they drag us all off to the camps, or more likely, when America is turned into a horrible politically correct anti-utopia resembling Brave New World (or more likely, Demolition Man), I’ll want to at least be able to say to myself “Well, I tried.”

I thing about the fact that 6% of all people are sociopathic, about 12% will inherently follow sociopaths, and probably 20% are narcissists. That’s not quite a majority, but it’s close enough to make it hell for those of us who are decent in a Constitutional Republic that’s been dulled down to a “democracy” where “51% of the people can tyrannize 49%.” And right now, a room full of people in Congress are ramming shit down our throat that according to a recent non-biased Rasmussen pole, 55% of the country is against.

Yet THEY (liberals, leftists, socialist Americans, statists and the uneducated children who are allowed to vote because “everyone’s voice needs to be heard“) (Thank you, Ted Kennedy, you fat, dead, commie homicidal fuck) call US (conservatives, libertarians, tea party people and Republicans) “CRAZY.” “Crazy” is the most common five-letter four-letter word I’ve heard in the past year.

And it doesn’t even have to be verified. I don’t remember a sanity panel convening on my behalf. It’s one of those non-logic leftist tricks. You turn a person into a “thing” so you can dismiss them easier. “Crazy tea bagger.” It really is like calling someone a “racist” or a “drunken Irishman.” Calling someone “crazy” is just turning a person into a thing. And things are easier to throw away than people.

I think about the idea that “All Democracies fail between 200 and 300 years, because people who don’t want to work vote in people who will let them.” I look at my new calender and see that we’re entering year 234 in that range. Before I give up and say “Oh well, we’ve had a good run….” I want to complain a little more. I have to complain a little more. Besides, I can still say what I want without being taken out and shot, and the way things are going, I may find a time in my life when I can’t say the things I want without being taken out and shot….SO..

WHAT’S SO CRAZY ABOUT US?

Seriously…I want any smart liberal, leftist (Berube, I’m looking at you), socialist American, or statist reading this to please comment and tell me how ANYTHING IS CRAZY on the following list of common agendas and ideals of conservatives, libertarians, tea partiers and Republicans. Tell me in logical and uncertain terms, WHAT’S CRAZY ABOUT THIS? (I don’t really need to hear from the uneducated children who think their voice should count. Because if you can’t find my state on a map, can’t find Iraq on a map, cannot tell me how many US senators there are, and what the Electoral College is, let alone what Austrian Economics is, I really don’t think your voice should count.)

SO…..Tell me…WHAT’S SO CRAZY ABOUT

  • Wanting “representatives” who listen to us, instead of dismissing us as crazy?
  • Wanting to control what we do in our homes?
  • Wanting to choose what we eat and what we listen to, without being nannied into compliance?
  • Not wanting to be taxed to death?
  • Not wanting to pay for crack babies and abortions if you don’t smoke crack and don’t like abortions?
  • Not apologizing for America at every turn?
  • Thinking the people who make our laws should not be above the law?
  • Thinking less laws is better than more laws?
  • Being able to do 8th grade math and knowing 10th grade history to realize that you can’t fix a recession by printing more money?
  • Wanting the private corporation (that pretends to be a government agency) that prints your money to be audited?
  • Wanting a President who calls bankers “fat cats” to quit appointing the fattest, greediest bankers in the world to his cabinet?
  • Wanting our President to call terrorists what they are: terrorists?
  • Not liking a President who wants to take away everyone’s money and rewrite the Constitution?
  • Saying that disliking a tyrant doesn’t make you racist?
  • Being upset about bribes being taken to ram something horrible down our throats?
  • Questioning boldly?
  • Wanting to keep our guns?
  • Complaining that the guy in charge of taxes didn’t pay his taxes?
  • Thinking corporations should be allowed to fail?
  • Thinking that “redistribution of wealth” and “social justice” are criminal?
  • Wanting to educate our own children, instead of letting the government indoctrinate and brainwash them?
  • Not destroy our economy because popular pseudo-science says that “the sky is falling!”?
  • Not being in favor of letting unlimited immigration choke our limited resources?

  • Not being racist just because you’re not in favor of letting unlimited immigration choke our limited resources?
  • Not voting for smiling charismatic evil fools with shadowy agendas and one-word “I’ll fill in the details later” platforms?
  • I’ll think of more later.

The government will NOT fix everything. The government has a long history of fucking up and bankrupting most everything it touches. (All governments do.) I love America, but I fear my government. As we usher in the new decade, remember what Ronald Reagan said, “The nine most terrifying words in the English language are ‘I’m from the government and I’m here to help’.”

We may be reaching a tipping point in a divided America, but many Americans today are pussies.

The Whiskey Rebellion in 1791 was fought over taxes imposed to pay for the Revolutionary War, taxes which were higher than the taxes that war was fought over. And between manipulated inflation and Congress after Congress who consider their position (on both sides of the aisle) an excuse to loot via tax & pork, taxes have gone up over 1000% since then. But we’re just complainin‘, man.

But also, like I said, I’m a fairly peaceful guy….we are fairly peaceful people. But you can only back a sweet cat into a corner far enough before tasting some teeth and claws on your ankle. But that’s a different post for another day…..

Churchill said, “If you’re not a liberal at twenty you have no heart, if you’re not a conservative at forty you have no brain”. This explains why, without action, we may be doomed. Children, hippies, leftists (and many “anarchist” punk rockers who are actually socialists) all have a lot in common…including thinking that “wealth is a crime”, “everything should be free, man”, “the government will fix everything“,”the rich should support the poor” and that some nanny-parent group of old men in suits and ties needs to protect us from ourselves at every turn.

“May you live in interesting times.”

–Chinese curse

As we slam into the new decade, I try to be hopeful. I even look at all this in geological time, to try to put it into perspective. If you represent the time from the creation of the earth to now as a 24-hour clock, humans appeared three minutes ago. I doubt we’ve even got five more minutes left. We, all humans, are but chalk on the sidewalk, waiting for the rain.

My life and my thoughts feel important to me, but my words will likely not be disseminating via radio from an orbiting pod-bot 10,000 years hence. In the last decade I’ve reached more humans than most, but it’s unlikely any of the million-and-a-half dollars retail in paperback books with my name on them that have been sold since 1990 will be around in 100 years. My websites will likely go dark a few years after I’m rounded up and shot. I believe in God, but not with the certainty of some Christians so I don’t have the “What can they do, send me home?” non-fear of death. (I actually kind of envy that in people. Even though I don’t have it.)

I try to be hopeful. I polish my writing skills, polish my rifle skills, I exercise my First and Second Amendment rights daily. I clutch my wonderful wife, hug my cats, and I try to speak out.

I try not to watch too much TV, just enough to stay informed without drowning in worry.

I (begrudgingly) pay all my taxes, and don’t even jaywalk. But they’ll might still try to drag me off and shoot me at some point.

I will not go gently.

But I do feel hopeful, and I am grateful for all I have. My life is damn wonderful…and I should have been dead by age 30. In fact, I planned that. I wanted to be famous and dead by 30.

But somehow by the grace of something bigger than myself, I’ve got something much better: slightly infamous…but more importantly, I am loved and healthy and happy at 45. It certainly beats dead and famous at 30.

So let this decade come, me and my wife; and my cats and my blog and my rifle are ready for whatever it brings.

Michael W. Dean,
Casper, Wyoming,
5:29 A.M., December 31, 2009

The Will of the People Be Damned

Wednesday, December 30th, 2009

If I hear one more person talk about how the United States is a democracy I am going to break their teeth out with a ball-peen hammer.  I doubt these people even know what, exactly, a democracy is.  I can’t remember the last time I’ve heard this nation referred to as a “Constitutional Republic” by anyone in our major media or even by the President of the United States, who is apparently a Constitutional scholar.  Republicans, don’t gloat, George W. Bush was also using the word out of context as well.

We hear this term, this catch phrase, “the will of the people”, bandied about every time someone wants to, oh, I don’t know, take away the right of gay & lesbian couples to marry.  Notice how they never have ballot initiatives to stop state governments from spending themselves into monstrous debt?  California could have used their ballot process in 2008 to do something about the fact that they’re flat broke.  They could have worked to rein in out-of-control spending.  Instead, the process was abused by out of state interests, most notably the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints (the Mormons) and the Knights of Columbus (a Catholic organization), who funneled millions of dollars into a campaign designed to rescind the rights of a small segment of Californians for no good reason.

Excellent job.

Meanwhile your state’s debt is ballooning out of control and your RINO Governor Schwarzenegger is busy doing albums with Tim Lambesis.  Well, not really, but he certainly isn’t putting an end to reckless spending and out of control taxation.  At least Austrian Death Machine is listenable, while watching Aah-nold himself stumble through an excuse-laden speech is not. 

This ballot process was repeated this year in Maine, where the state legislature passed a same-sex marriage law and Governor Baldacci signed it into law, but again, outside interests moved in, set up, and abused the “people’s veto” power that exists in Maine to further their own ends. I grew up in New England.  People in Maine tend to keep to themselves and don’t want to bother anyone, but they do get scared, and when the National Organization for Marriage rolls in and starts telling Mainers that “teh gheys” are coming for their kids, it’s no surprise that enough people fell for it to wipe out the law.  It wasn’t a huge margin, but all it takes is 51%.  Arkansas also outlawed adoption and child fostering by gays & lesbians in 2008 via ballot initiative in a roundabout way- only people with a state-issued marriage license can adopt, isn’t it convenient that same-sex couples cannot obtain them in Arkansas?  As a result, 29 families are entangled in a lawsuit because a majority of voters in that state decided that their religious beliefs were more important than the rights of those of the families in question.

It’s time we began to question just how these initiatives can be used.  Ballot initiatives were never intended to be used against the rights of fellow citizens, and yet this process has been used time and again, especially regarding the issue of same-sex marriage or other issues invlving LGBT rights.

In 1978, the Briggs Initiative was placed on the ballot.  This measure would have mandated that the state fire all gay and lesbian public school teachers and was vague enough to possibly include any teacher who supported LGBT rights.  Beauty queen, singer,  and orange juice pitchwoman Anita Bryant’s campaign of removing civil rights protections for gays & lesbians spurred on this effort.  It’s a good thing Carrie Prejean is such damaged goods, because history could have been repeated.  Fortunately, the Briggs initiative failed by a 58% majority, but the question still remains- why is this process allowed to be used as a weapon against other citizens?  It’s been 30 years and we’re still having to go to a ballot box to try and defend our rights, and our track record isn’t good because the majority, though shrinking, is still a majority.

Don’t these people have anything better to do than go around putting individual rights on the chopping block, and making sure that they demonize and lie in order to scare people into voting the way they want?  I don’t give a damn if you don’t like gay & lesbian couples or homosexuality as a whole, but they’re not depriving anyone else of life, liberty, or property by force or fraud, and their marriages don’t affect anyone else’s.  These initiatives, however, do constitute an act of aggression against same-sex couples and gay & lesbian individuals, who must subsidize the state-sponsored institution of marriage while being disallowed to avail themselves of it.  Some would say that the libertarian answer is to get the government out of marriage licensing, but given how entrenched it is now, that’s an unrealistic goal, and one that could be seen by these “pro-family” types as an attack against them.  This will only serve to galvanize social conservatives and theocrats.  For now, the answer is to challenge this ‘will of the people’ garbage and let it be known that individual rights are not up for a vote.  If it’s the right to choose who you enter into a contract with today, will it be the right of which church you attend tomorrow, or what you may not own in order to defend yourself, like some cities whose mob rule has outlawed handguns?

Tyranny by a majority is just as despicable as tyranny by a single person.  We are a nation founded not on mob rule, but on respect for individual liberty.  When we take the rights of our citizens and hold them up to a vote, we cheapen the principles this country was founded upon.  After all, the government is supposed to protect individual rights, not take them away at the behest of angry mobs without a compelling interest.  If we allow these ballot initiatives to stand, then we have established a precedent that rights are only as permanent as the majority allows them to be, and that thought does not make me comfortable at all.

~Matt Frost

You fought the law, and you won

Wednesday, December 30th, 2009

Three websites we love:

First up is FIJA – Fully Informed Jury Association. They teach the little-known right of juries in America to judge not just a person’s guilt of a law, but the correctness of that law itself. This right is even tacitly written into the Wyoming State Constitution, but can be tried elsewhere. NOTE: IANAL = I AM NOT A LAWYER, AND THIS IS OPINION ONLY. Read the sites, and consult an attorney. Your mileage may vary.

The second kick-ass site of the day is Judicial Watch

A non-partisan site devoted to true transparency, and accountability in our elected “leaders.” Check out their recent list of the ten most corrupt politicians in America. It includes one Republican, the rest are liberals. The list includes Obama, Eric Holder and Senator Christopher Dodd, with extensive descriptions of their transgressions.

And lastly, The JPFO – The JEWS FOR THE PRESERVATION OF FIREARMS OWNERSHIP.

You don’t have to be Jewish to join, I’m a card-carrying member and I’m as goyim as they come.

The JPFO is so uncompromising in all their stances that they almost make other gun-rights groups look like leftist gun grabboids.

The JPFO’s basis premise is “If German Jews in WWII had not voluntarily registered their guns, and had not handed them over when told to, Hitler would be but a footnote in history.”

The JPFO was founded by former firearms dealer Aaron Zelman in 1986. The JPFO interprets the Second Amendment as recognizing a pre-existing natural right of individuals to keep and bear arms. They have documented numerous links between gun control and government sponsored genocide.

Enjoy, and happy surfing!

–Michael W. Dean

Failure is good for self-esteem.

Tuesday, December 29th, 2009

You don't go in the bathroom with me

Greetings and welcome to my first foray into the blogosphere. My name is Matt Frost, and I will be your screaming independent voice for the foreseeable future.

A little bit about me first, though. As of this writing I am 37 years old. I’ve been a musician for 21 years and a lover of music from the time I burst forth from my mother’s birth canal. In recent years I’ve also been a competitive strength athlete as an amateur strongman and more recently, an Olympic-style weightlifter. Mind you, I am nowhere strong enough to compete in the Olympics, I do this for fun, and it’s less harsh on my body than strongman is. I currently sing in a band called Machina Infernus, and also have a project called Frost Giant in which I write all the music and play most all the instruments on the recording. With me so far?

Good.

I must say I am surprised that this blog came together so quickly, but really, when people do instead of dither, stuff gets done. Now I have to put my mouth where my, er, mouth is. Shouldn’t be too hard given that I am an opinionated ass who is rarely at a loss for words.

My first rant will be on the subject of equality, or more specifically, the idea put forth by some that equal outcome for all is the highest possible goal. While it’s true that nobody wants to fail, and that only in some very rare circumstances does anyone want someone else to fail, failure happens and it’s a part of everyday life. Even when the circumstances are as equal as possible, the outcome never is. In NASCAR, all of the cars meet the same specifications, the driver is the only variable. Only one car can cross that finish line first, they don’t all cross it simultaneously. Does this not prove that equal outcome is not possible when you have the human element?

In order to have equal outcome, you have to choke off the human desire to achieve, whether it’s in a sport or the workplace. The only other way is by force- by aiming a gun at someone and telling them that anything above and beyond what everyone else has will be taken by force and given to those who have less. It’s the ultimate example of the teacher who takes away your gum, saying that if you don’t have enough for everyone then you can’t have it either. It’s what we see now in some places where children play sports but no score is kept and everyone gets a trophy. Why, to win, to stand out above others, would be hurtful and unfair to those who didn’t! Again, failure is seen as the end of the world and not as the motivator towards success that it really is.

As a weightlifter, I would be incensed if I spent months training for a meet, won a gold medal, and saw that everyone else got a gold medal as well even though they didn’t win. I would likewise react in horror if someone else beat me, but someone tried to give me a gold medal and pretend that I was equal even though I lost. What’s the point of competing if there’s nothing to compete for?

Is that, then, the end goal of all of this engineering, trying to subjugate the competitive nature of humans so that we do not desire achievement, victory, or the true sense of pride that comes not just from winning but from the effort you spent, regardless of the outcome? I’ve always believed that our public schools have long ago shifted from institutions of learning to institutions for obedience, where conformity and mediocrity are encouraged… Heh, the United States of Obedience. Who would have figured it, that the endgame is not just to make people feel good, that it’s not just about their self-esteem. It’s about destroying the means of achieving it so that you’ll do what you’re told without question.

As long as you get a shiny ribbon, all is well.