Posts Tagged ‘liberty’

…two steps back.

Monday, February 22nd, 2010

Well, we can’t win them all.

For the Record: Uganda’s Proposed Law

This slick piece, created by WorldNet Daily contributor Jason Mitchell (also known as ‘Molotov Mitch’) has created a bit of a stir.  I can’t see why, I mean, he’s only coming out in support of a bill currently pending in Uganda’s parliament that would make homosexuality a capital offense.  He seems irked that many people, including thousands of Christians, have called upon American religious and political leaders to condemn the people pushing this bill.  If gay Ugandans don’t like the new law, should it take effect, they can just leave. 

This bill, commonly referred to as the “Kill the Gays” bill, would make certain gay sex acts punishable by death and others by life imprisonment.  It would also require Ugandans who know a gay person to report them to the police.  Failure to do so will land them in jail.  Perhaps Ugandans can leave, but where will they go?  Africa is the New Christian Experiment, with Catholics on one side promoting starvation, famine, and AIDS by preaching against condoms and borth control, and Evangelicals pushing for draconian laws against homosexuality and agreeing, for once, with the Catholics on doing away with condoms.  Christians have been fucking over Africa for centuries.  Maybe King Mwanga II was right.

Who was King Mwanga?  According to Mitchell, he was a “Sodomite King” who passed a law that required any male he desired to yield to his sexual advances.   There is no evidence that King Mwanga II was a homosexual or that he instituted such a law.  In my readings on the subject, only Mitchell makes the claim.  According to his summary on Wikipedia, he was a polygamist who had sixteen wives with whom he fathered seven sons and four daughters.  While he might have enjoyed the company of men on the side, the claim that he was a “Sodomite” is ridiculous on it’s face.  Mwanga II did, in fact, have 22 Catholic missionaries burned at the stake, but not because they refused his charming propositions.  He had them killed because they had converted to Catholicism and wouldn’t renounce their new faith.  These men became known as the Uganda Martyrs, but they died for their religious beliefs, not because they wouldn’t play with the king’s royal sceptre.  Later in life, after being deposed and exiled to the Seychelles, Mwanga became an Anglican and spent his final days as a Christian man.  

Mitchell also lies about the Founding Fathers, claiming they made homosexuality a capital offense, yet he only cites two examples where anything close to this was enforced.  “Anti-buggery laws” were a default under English Common Law.  This isn’t really a stretch.  To say that they actively persecuted homosexuals, however, is.  Very simply, homosexuality wasn’t defined as an orientation or attraction until 100 years after the Republic was founded.  Of course, homosexuality existed- Washington did have a soldier drummed out.  It didn’t stop him from having Baron Friederich von Steuben, a Prussian General and alleged lover of young boys, come and whip the Continental Army into shape.  Without von Steuben, it’s likely the Revolutionary War would have been lost. 

He ends his slick propaganda piece with a quote from Martin Luther King, Jr, saying that “the moral arm of the universe is long, but it bends towards justice”.  I don’t think Mitchell understands the context of that quote, but then again, he deliberately mischaracterized and outright falsified so much else in is video editorial, I don’t think one more lie will matter.

~Matti Frost

Western States Republicans leading the way to Liberty

Sunday, February 14th, 2010

Pro-Liberty legislation on Guns & Property Rights proposed by GOP legislators

by Michael W. Dean, Wyoming

Some interesting things going on here in the Rocky Mountain West…

There are three gun-rights bills going before the Wyoming legislature this month (as extra bills in a budget-only session), don’t know that they will pass, one will probably get tabled and considered later. two are 10th Amendment bills that would allow guns made and used only in the state to not come under federal purview (circumventing the Interstate Commerce Clause), but unlike the Montana bill, one of these actually allows the state to prosecute federal agents who violate it.

The other bill would allow Wyoming non-felons to carry a gun concealed without a permit, like Alaska and Vermont.

From the Casper Tribune:

CHEYENNE — A proposal that would allow people in Wyoming to carry concealed weapons without permits passed an initial legislative hurdle on Thursday.

If the bill passes, Wyoming would become only the third state in the nation, after Vermont and Alaska, to allow conceal-carry without a permit.

Under House Bill 113, the only people not allowed to carry concealed weapons in the state would be people under the age of 21, convicted felons, those convicted of drug-related charges, alcoholics, those with physical disabilities that impair their ability to handle firearms, and people who have lived in the state less than six months.

Currently, Wyoming residents must apply every five years for concealed weapons permits.

Rep. Lorraine Quarberg, the Thermopolis Republican sponsoring the bill, said the legislation is meant simply to spell out rights that are already guaranteed under the Wyoming Constitution and the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

“I just believe people have the right to protect themselves and defend themselves,” Quarberg said. “And I want to make sure that we put it in statute and people know they can do it.”

There’s also the bill in session now to amend the state constitution to block federal demands that Wyomingites get health insurance if that federal health care debacle somehow passes.
http://legisweb.state.wy.us/2010/Digest/SJ0001.htm

And then there’s this from Utah…

Salt Lake City Tribune:

SALT LAKE CITY — Conservative Utah lawmakers (photo of state capitol in SLC) want to spark a U.S. Supreme Court case that could ultimately allow states to develop resource-rich parcels of land that are now off limits where the federal government is the landlord.

The lawmakers said they will attempt to trigger an avalanche of legislation in the West through the use of eminent domain, which governments use to take private property for public use.

More than 60 percent of Utah is owned by the federal government, and policy makers here have long complained that federal ownership hinders their ability to generate tax revenue and adequately fund public schools.

Legislation was introduced in the Utah House on Thursday allowing the use of eminent domain on federal land. The effort has the full support of Republican Attorney General Mark Shurtleff, who would have to defend the law.

(blog post first published in Libertarian Republican)

Strong words, angry music.

Monday, February 8th, 2010

The most life-changing moments for me have always come by accident, it seems.  When I was 15, I told a lie that ended up committing me to buying a drumset and started me on the path to becoming a musician.  When I was 30, another flap of my big fat mouth put me in the gym and it’s kept me there, more or less, for the last 7 years.  This bout of happenstance, however, was not my doing, at least, not directly, but it came about through my acquaintance with Michael W. Dean.

Michael and I met online at ConservativePunk.com, where our common love for music and passion of political discourse made us friends, at least online friends.  When he was writing the first Right Arm of Wyoming album, I offered to send him some drum loops I had created in a program I have.  Being a drummer for so long, I tend to try and make programmed drums sound as real as possible.  Alas, I had no way of uploading the files to him, as none of the upload sites worked, but all of this was discussed openly on ConPunk.

After the RAW CD Cling to Our Guns was released, Michael would post reviews and comments on ConPunk, both positive and negative.  One such post was a review posted on the Bridge Nine forums.  The post, titled Fox News- The Band, was a scathing criticism of RAW’s music and themes.  One user, however, seemed to have some inside knowledge, which could only have come from them being a lurker on ConPunk.  They claimed that I was the drummer for RAW and that I was a “homosexual right-wing Odinist”.  Sadly, the post has long since scrolled off the boards, but it did make me call out the person who posted such wrong information about me and RAW on the B9 boards.  I also became a poster there as well.

It was shortly thereafter that I saw a post about organizing a compilation CD titled Enough is Enough, to benefit Freedom to Marry, an organization dedicated to promoting marriage equality and fighting anti-gay ballot initiatives.  I contacted the organizer, Paul Blest, and offered a Frost Giant song, but none of the existing songs at the time fit topically except for Relic, which was just too long at 9 minutes to be included.  So, I decided to record fresh.  Initially, the plan was to do a 7 Seconds song called Regress No Way, which was arguably one of the first anti-homophobia songs out there, but the compilation started gaining ground, and soon, a lot of bigger names in punk & hardcore started signing on.  I knew then that as much as I love that band, I couldn’t go out there with a 7 Seconds cover.  I wanted to make my mark, so I decided to write a new song.  It took me a long time to get a song in my head, as I do not do too well when I am forced up against a deadline, but soon enough I had something to work with and I went to my drum program and my trusty Les Paul and wrote it out.  What came out of it was something I never imagined. 

The song Not While I Draw Breath is probably the most angriest, pissed off, intense and in-your-face Frost Giant song to date.  The lyrics deal with standing up to oppression and tyranny, of not caving in and backing down, and with being willing to hurt, suffer, and even die for the sake of your principles.  It speaks of defending yourself and not going out meekly without a fight.  On one hand, it could refer to the fight for marriage equality and is thus in line with the message of the compilation, but it’s written to be far more universal than that.  Complacency, apathy, and willful ignorance abound in music and in pop culture in general.  We are easily distracted by trivial things and made to focus on those as if they were important while we’re taken for a ride on the things that really matter.  I intend this song to be a wake-up call to anyone that will hear it, but I leave it to the listener to apply it to their own lives however they see fit.  I will not tell you what to think or what you should stand for, only that you should think, and that you should stand for something.

Not While I Draw Breath

by Matt Frost, January 2010.  All rights reserved.

Will you stand with me
Fight and die if need be
Hold against the hordes until
The last man falls
Will you sacrifice all
You have gained in life
Reject your comfort
For a greater end
Stand together
And never waver
Brave in the face of
Overwhelming odds
For our future,
And our freedom
We unite in
Liberty or death

The evil stirs from its sleep
And no one will be safe from its reach
For we shall fight to be free
And never will we bend our knee

Forever clawing
Fight like a demon
Taking it to
The very bitter end
Swords are drawing
Battle lines forming
Storm clouds are churning
Soon there will be war
The earth will be fed
With blood
And the skies will weep
Unto the dead
Never give up,
Never back down,
We unite in
Liberty or death

Tonight, we lay down our lives
In the path of those who would oppress
And enslave us to their god
And trod us under until we are no more

Not while I draw breath
Will I submit, will I accept
Not while I draw breath
Will I bow down, nor will I live
With empty regrets

Now feel the sting of a thousand swords
Vanquish the hordes drive them away
To the darkness from whence they came
Obliterate they are no more

Overrun them all
Take what is ours.
Crush the wretched enemy
Bring victory
To our hearth and home

***************************************

Check the song out on the Frost Giant myspace.  Let me know what you think.

~Matti F.

I hate children.

Monday, January 25th, 2010

Look upon this face.  This is the face that will steal your liberty every single time.  Do you know why?  I’ll tell you.

Your freedom is harmful to children, therefore it must be curtailed.  The ideal nanny state would reduce us all to this crying child, helpless to do anything without government help or better yet, permission.

About a year and a half ago, Colorado passed a law barring discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity in such areas as employment, housing, credit, public accommodations, and so on.  While I am opposed to anti-discrimination laws on principle and believe them to be relics, the response from the social conservatives on the right was to try and scare people by saying that their children would be preyed upon by cross-dressers in public bathrooms.  Listen to this ad by Focus on the Family.  Try not to laugh, because although it is comical and absurd, a lot of people fall for shit like this.

Here’s another spot by the lovely kooks at the National Organization for Marriage, the lovely bunch who brought you the hysterical “Gathering Storm” ads.

Notice how they use children to make parents afraid, scared that they will learn that gay people exist, that they’re even your neighbors and relatives, with the underlying, unstated threat being that acceptance of same-sex marriage will make your kids gay.

Lest you think I am a one-trick pony with this gay issue, look to other nanny-state laws that were put into effect initially to protect children, but were soon extended to all of us.  Seat belt laws are a prime example.  Used to be that if someone under 12 was in a car they had to be buckled in, but now we all have to wear them regardless.  It doesn’t matter that seat belts can kill by trapping someone in a burning car, strangling a motorist or passenger in a wreck, or holding them firmly to a seat that careens into a tree whereas an impact without a seat belt may have knocked them aside, the government is going to force you for your alleged own good to wear a seat belt, and it all started with the grand, noble idea of protecting the children.

Video games are a favorite target of censors who claim that they make children violent, or turn them into lethargic slugs who shun fresh air and grow obese.  Yes, it’s the video game, not the lack of parenting, that makes a child stay indoors on beautiful days.  It’s Grand Theft Auto that makes a kid steal a car or shoot someone.  Has to be, because the parents in these cases are all in utter denial that their special little zygote would do something so terrible.  It’s the same kind of denial that allowed Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold to stockpile guns and grenades and pipe bombs and pull off the Columbine Massacre.  Not my kids, not my fault, must be Marilyn Manson’s fault.

The most damaging instance, however, came following the halftime performance at the 2004 Super Bowl, when Justin Timberlake grabbed Janet Jackson’s blouse and tugged, exposing for a mere half a second, one saggy, flappy brown breast that had a gold star over the nipple.  You would have thought that she was masturbating with a crucifix in front of Catholic school kindergartners by the outrage, but in reality it was so fast that few people even saw it.  Cameras cut away and Janet quickly covered up her, ah, “wardrobe malfunction”.  If I remember correctly, this was tame compared to some of the other performances where raunchy bump and grinds were being performed by Nelly and the suggestive lyrics coming from him and Sean Combs (I have no idea what the fuck he calls himself these days).  In the aftermath of this event, the FCC increased their fines for indecency tenfold and began going after broadcasters in television and radio for things that wouldn’t have merited a second listen or look.  Howard Stern was chased off of terrestrial radio, and many morning “shock jocks” either lost their gigs or were forced to water down their shows to the point where they weren’t funny or engaging anymore.  The panic also had a chill factor on what networks and stations were willing to allow, and many programming decisions were now put in the hands of worrywart lawyers and middle management whose job was to insulate the company from fines and possible lawsuits.  The television networks are dying dinosaurs, giant carcasses being strangled by regulation, while cable thrives.  Terrestrial radio is a dead medium for all but political talk on the AM waves, satellite radio is ascendant.  The internet is blowing them all away, it’s truly the last frontier of free speech.

If you think the government and the FCC don’t want to stick their noses into cable, satellite, and internet, think again.  Bet you dollars to donuts the rationale they will use is “protecting the children”, because apparently, being a parent is hard and we need our government to help us out.

Think long and hard before you offer up everyone’s liberty as a sacrifice to protect your children.  Those of us who are over 30 grew up with very little of these restrictions and protections and we’re just fine.  You’re simply being groomed to accept more and more government intrusion into your everyday life, and they’re getting at you by preying on the fear that parents naturally have for their offspring.  Don’t fall for it, whether it comes from a liberal or a conservative, the government does not have your best interests at heart.  The leviathan is only after power and can never have enough.

~Matti Frost